Scroll To Top
World

The Religious
Implications of Marriage

In discussing the argument that the people of California have a problem with extending marriage rights to same-sex couples because of the word's "religious" implications, one of the justices suggested stripping all Californians of the word "marriage" and entering couples into "civil unions" or "domestic partnerships."


Sorry to interrupt...
But we wanted to take a moment to thank you for reading. Your support makes original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Help us hold Trump accountable.

In discussing the argument that the people of California have a problem with extending marriage rights to same-sex couples because of the word's "religious" implications, one of the justices suggested stripping all Californians of the word "marriage" and entering couples into "civil unions" or "domestic partnerships."

Would it solve the problem?

Yes, Ken Starr argues -- it would solve the problem.

But the issue at hand, he says, is whether or not the people of California have the right to pass a proposition like Prop. 8 -- and by his reasoning, they do, simply because Californians have the right to essentially govern themselves.

Recommended Stories for You

The Advocates with Sonia BaghdadyOut / Advocate Magazine - Alan Cumming and Jake Shears

From our Sponsors

Most Popular

Latest Stories