CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
U.S. senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma has whipped up a long, rambling statement on why he defers "in large part to our military leaders" on "don't ask, don't tell."
AmericaBlog posted Coburn's response to a concerned Oklahoman over the weekend. In it, Coburn speaks of the "forced cohabitation of homosexuals with heterosexuals" and says that "the 1993 law does not ban or exclude homosexuals from serving in the armed forces."
The letter ends, "May God bless you and your family!"
Read Coburn's letter in its entirety here.
Thank you for writing me regarding homosexuals serving in the United States military. I appreciate hearing from you again and I apologize for my delayed response.
I am truly grateful for our military men and women who have courageously been defending the country and preserving freedom. I know that active military service, especially when it separates spouses and children is a great sacrifice for everyone involved.
I understand your opinion and perspective on this issue. As you probably know, the current "don't ask, don't tell" policy was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1993. I was not a member of Congress at that time.
On June 8th of this year, the Supreme Court announced it would not review a 2008 decision by the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston that rejected a challenge of "don't ask, don't tell" by service members discharged under the current policy. In rejecting a challenge of the policy last June on a first amendment basis, the First Circuit Court said the current law "is justified on a content-neutral, non-speech basis; specifically, maintaining the military's effectiveness as a fighting force." I support the decision of the Supreme Court in upholding the law.
In its brief, the Obama Administration supported the court's decision to uphold the "don't ask, don't tell" policy. "Applying the strong deference traditionally afforded to the Legislative and Executive Branches in the area of military affairs, the court of appeals properly upheld the statute," argued Elena Kagan, who as Solicitor General represents the Administration before the Supreme Court. The brief argued that the "don't ask, don't tell" policy "rationally related to the government's legitimate interest in military discipline and cohesion."
Recently, though, according to a New York Times article from October 10, President Obama spoke at a fund raiser dinner for the Human Rights Campaign stating, "I will end 'don't ask, don't tell.' " He did not give a timeline for this decision; however I will continue to monitor the situation.
The primary responsibilities of our military, defending our nation and winning wars, should not be compromised by politics. As I noted, this military policy was created by Congress and the President but is supported by many in our armed forces. While I believe it is imperative that the elected leaders of the people hold all government Departments accountable for their actions and policies, I defer in large part to our military leaders on matters of military readiness and code of conduct. This includes the impact changing the "don't ask, don't tell" policy would have, especially since military leaders note that this issue is fundamentally about military readiness.
The overriding issue that would affect the readiness of the armed forces would be the forced cohabitation of homosexuals with heterosexuals at forward operating bases and deployed ships. This would be similar to forcing female soldiers to cohabit with male soldiers in housing situations that offer little to no privacy. The 1993 law does not ban or exclude homosexuals from serving in the armed forces and some estimate there are currently 65,000 homosexual men and women in the military. Please know that I have the utmost respect for every man and woman who chooses to wear our nation's uniform and accepts the responsibility and sacrifices that come with it.
While we may not agree on every issue, I thank you for writing. I hope to hear from you in the future. May God bless you and your family!
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
November 14 2025 4:08 PM
True
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
November 16 2025 9:15 AM
True
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
HIV-positive men stage 'Kiss-In' protest at U.S.-Mexico border (in photos)
December 01 2025 12:56 PM
Maryland community outraged after ‘bigoted’ early morning rainbow crosswalk removal
December 01 2025 11:07 AM
19 LGBTQ+ movies & TV shows coming in December 2025 & where to watch them
December 01 2025 9:00 AM
Gay NYC councilman running for Congress says America is at a crossroads
December 01 2025 6:52 AM
What the AIDS crisis stole from Black gay men
December 01 2025 6:00 AM
Japan's ban on marriage equality is constitutional, according to a Tokyo court
November 28 2025 4:59 PM
How a queer fashion show took on New York Fashion Week
November 28 2025 4:58 PM
8 LGBTQ+ films coming in 2026 that we can't wait to see
November 28 2025 12:00 PM
A guide to the 'Heated Rivalry' actors, characters, and gay storylines
November 28 2025 4:11 AM




































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes