CONTACTStaffCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2024 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
As news of the presidential memorandum conferring hospital visitation rights on same-sex couples settled in Friday morning, a gnawing ambivalence enveloped me.
Once this directive works its way through the rules process at Health and Human Services, it will no doubt provide real people with profound and irreplaceable moments that might otherwise have been denied them in their darkest and most vulnerable hours. For that I say, Thank you, Mr. President.
But as I look at the list of advancements President Obama has made for LGBT Americans, I can't escape noticing that nearly all of them fall under the heading "Too politically palatable to have a downside."
It's an ever-growing list of small, incremental steps toward equality that are most certainly positive but still fall far short of the campaign promises that Sen. Barack Obama ran on.
Here's a sampling:
* The presidential memo that provided "certain benefits" to same-sex partners of federal employees: A directive that did help some same-sex couples, especially foreign service officers at the State Department, whose partners, among other things, weren't even eligible for emergency evacuations in life-threatening circumstances. But viewing it through a political lens, this change never ran the risk of becoming a right-wing talking point. Most mainstream Americans couldn't even grasp what benefits had been granted since they didn't include health and pension.
*
Passing hate-crimes legislation: While very symbolically important because it was truly the first piece of major federal legislation ever passed to protect LGBT citizens, it was not an unpopular piece of legislation nationwide. Christian conservatives didn't even consider it deleterious enough to have framed the measure as the beginning of the end for mankind as we know it. Was it a legislative battle? Yes -- in the Senate, where legislative inaction rules and anything else seems freakishly eccentric. But no lawmaker, least of all the president, is going to be seriously targeted for passing hate-crimes law.
*
Allowing the Census Bureau to release numbers on same-sex couples in 2011: These numbers were actually available in 2000, but the Bush administration said the Defense of Marriage Act prohibited the bureau from releasing them. The Obama administration found that their publication posed no conflict with DOMA.
*
Various and sundry appointments of openly gay people: With the notable exception of Chai Feldblum, none of these appointments have been so high-profile or consequential that they required or invited a serious confirmation battle. While it's definitely beneficial for the LGBT community to have people like John Berry and Fred Hochberg serving important roles in the administration, the Office of Personnel Management and the Export-Import Bank just don't attract the attention of a Cabinet member or a Supreme Court nominee. However, nominating Feldblum to a seat on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission did draw fire from social conservatives, and Obama stood his ground on her appointment.
*
Ending the HIV travel ban: Under Obama, Health and Human Services finally launched the process of changing the rule last year, but the political battle -- or what there was of one -- took place before Obama was even elected. The Senate voted to overturn the ban as part of a PEPFAR funding bill in 2008, and President Bush signed it into law.
The Presidential memorandum for hospital visitation rights of same-sex couples fits comfortably among these accomplishments. Not only do a plurality of Americans now favor some form of legal recognition for same-sex couples -- be it domestic partnerships, civil unions, or marriage -- but if you break out the rights associated with marriage, they poll even higher.
A Newsweek poll from December 2008 found that
67% of voters thought "gay and lesbian domestic partners" should get Social Security benefits; 73% said they should have access to health
insurance and other employee benefits; 74% favored giving them
inheritance rights; and fully 86% said they should have hospital
visitation rights.
No one can deny this was a savvy move.
Richard Socarides, former LGBT adviser to President Bill Clinton, said
he wished the directive had come sooner but acknowledged that it was a
strategic win.
"Politically, I think it's very smart," he said.
"It's a horrible problem with an easy and inexpensive solution. No one isn't for hospital visitation rights. Obama
needed to show that he was taking action, and now he can point to this --
a small step but certainly better than nothing. And it shows that he
is thinking about gay rights."
The problem with these
advances is that almost every one of them could essentially be swept
away by the next administration. Just look at what kind of havoc
Virginia governor Bob McDonnell has wreaked in Virginia in terms of rolling
back discrimination protections for LGBT people.
Die-hard Obama
supporters often complain that the president never gets enough praise
for his pro-LGBT achievements. And while the president certainly
deserves credit for pushing the hate-crimes bill and giving life to
"don't ask, don't tell" repeal with his State of the Union address, LGBT advocates cannot afford to wallow in those victories.
At a recent
policy discussion, one mainstream journalist framed Obama as "a reluctant
warrior" who needs to be pushed into a corner before he comes out
swinging. Nothing demonstrates this better than health reform, where the
administration let the bill slide toward the brink of destruction for
an entire year before swooping in to rehabilitate the effort.
For
those who declare hospital visitation a major victory, I do not
disagree. This week's memorandum will surely bring invaluable comfort to
average couples across the country in a critical time of need.
But I
would add a note of caution: This president has never responded to
carrots, and a presidential memorandum is only as good as the next
administration.
President Obama has two glaring opportunities to create
lasting change this year: the Employment Non-Discrimination Act and "don't ask, don't tell" repeal. Passing either one of them would mark the single biggest advancement for
LGBT equality in this nation's history, but that
window of opportunity narrows with every passing day.
I unequivocally applaud the president's action, but I also never witnessed a campaign rally where Obama told a roaring crowd of supporters, "And as president, I will confer certain benefits on same-sex couples!"
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Meet all 37 of the queer women in this season's WNBA
April 17 2024 11:24 AM
17 of the most batsh*t things N.C. Republican governor candidate Mark Robinson has said
September 19 2024 4:34 PM
True
After 20 years, and after tonight, Obama will no longer be the Democrats' top star
August 20 2024 12:28 PM
More Than 50 of Our Favorite LGBTQ+ Moms
May 12 2024 11:44 AM
Trump ally Laura Loomer goes after Lindsey Graham: ‘We all know you’re gay’
September 13 2024 2:28 PM
Conjoined twins Lori Schappell and trans man George Schappell dead at 62
April 27 2024 6:13 PM
Latest Stories
20 spicy pics from Folsom Street Fair 2024
October 02 2024 7:18 PM
New book tracks 50 years of landmark LGBTQ+ legal battles
October 02 2024 5:58 PM
Denver's only lesbian bar is closing: 'The world has shifted and so have we'
October 02 2024 3:34 PM
Who won the VP debate? Here's what news outlets are saying
October 02 2024 2:35 PM
Just childless cat ladies? Meet 11 childless MEN who've made history
October 02 2024 1:00 PM
Everything you need to know about homonormativity – including a definition
October 02 2024 1:00 PM
N.J. Democrat Sue Altman perfectly defends trans athletes: 'We have to respect people'
October 02 2024 12:37 PM