Inside the military’s LGBTQ+ witch hunts
Trump’s return to the White House is resurfacing questions over who is fit to serve. Two veterans — from opposite sides — reveal the lasting harm of our discriminatory past.
December 8, 2024
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Trump’s return to the White House is resurfacing questions over who is fit to serve. Two veterans — from opposite sides — reveal the lasting harm of our discriminatory past.
A federal judge in D.C. ruled that military members challenging the ban were likely to succeed.
In hearing arguments Tuesday in a case that has largely focused on free speech rights, the U.S. Supreme Court appeared ready to uphold a law that says colleges receiving federal funds cannot bar recruiters
A federal appeals court in Boston on Monday threw out the lawsuit Cook v. Gates, which challenged the constitutionality of "don't ask, don't tell," the military policy that prohibits lesbian, gay, and bisexual Americans from serving openly in the military. The federal court of appeals for the first circuit of Boston dismissed the case, ruling that "special deference" must be given to Congress in situations where federal statutes regulate military affairs, Agence France-Presse reported.
In the past, the law has been used to arrest dozens of people in what critics have called a “gay witch-hunt.”
A federal appeals court has lifted the last barrier to implementation.
The Ninth Circuit upheld an injunction against the ban, but will the Trump administration ask the Supreme Court to weigh in?
The Department of Justice is asking the court to set aside a lower court’s block on the anti-trans policy.
A federal judge on Monday dismissed a lawsuit challenging the military's antigay "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
The ruling, which only lifts a preliminary injunction, is counter to what all lower courts have said about the issue.
An appeals court strikes down an injunction blocking the ban, but it still can't go into effect because of other courts' injunctions.
The administration wants the ban to go into effect even though cases against it haven't made their way through federal courts.
The judges may reconsider if the military takes action against trans service members.
An attorney for the troops called it “part of the administration’s absurd attempt to purge highly skilled and dedicated service members simply because they are transgender.”
Attorneys argue the ban “fails under any level of review,” citing a “shocking proposition that transgender people do not exist.”
The 3-judge panel appeared skeptical of the reasoning behind the government’s arguments.
Two federal appeals courts are considering whether to allow the ban to proceed until the case is resolved.
"The executive order is irrelevant," Deputy Associate Attorney General Abhishek Kambli said when asked about President Donald Trump's disparaging language toward transgender people.
Attorneys say the Talbott case hinges on a district court judge's opinion that the Trump administration policy is "soaked with animus."