
While James Dobson’s Focus on the Family continues to cherry-pick and distort research on LGBT families, Soulforce and Truth Wins Out are raising the stakes to expose what they call a harmful and alarming disinformation campaign discriminating against American families. A week after Robynne Sapp and Dotti Berry were arrested as part of Soulforce’s new "Focus on the Facts" campaign, Truth Wins Out has launched a new Web site, RespectMyResearch.org. “Dobson’s latest op-ed in Time was the last straw,” declared Wayne Besen, executive director of Truth Wins Out. “I called five different mainstream researchers, all of whom were floored that their research was being used to denounce LGBT families.”
Judith Stacey was one of them. “I’ve had to spend a lot of time correcting the record,” Stacey confirmed. “When Dobson says thousand of studies demonstrate that children do better with a mom and a dad, he is not talking about research that studied gay and lesbian parents. He is talking about children who were raised by two heterosexual parents versus children who were raised by a single heterosexual parent.”
Rather, all of the major medical and professional associations, including the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Counseling Association, the National Association of Social Workers, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychoanalytic Association, and the American Academy of Family Physicians, have unequivocally discredited Dobson’s claims.
“The endorsement of these organizations does not represent a small minority,” stated Brian Dew of the American Counseling Association. Citing numerous studies from over the last three decades, professional researchers have consistently demonstrated that optimal development of a child is not based on orientation of parents, but on stable attachment to adults.
“Every time I am asked to debate, I am [pitted against] commentators like syndicated conservative columnist Maggie Gallagher,” remarked Stacey. “I am almost never debating a researcher, because there are no legitimate, credible researchers that have found the kind of evidence that Dobson and others use to discredit LGBT parents.”
RespectMyResearch.org will be used as a platform to educate the public and the media. “There is a difference between balancing opinion and balancing research in a story,” stated Clinton Anderson, director of the Office of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Concerns, American Psychological Association. “No research has come up with a negative conclusion about gay and lesbian parents, and asking someone to give their opinion is not balance. The media needs to be more sophisticated.”
As anti-LGBT family policies proliferate on the state level, Jeff Lutes, executive director of Soulforce, sees this media and public education campaign as vital to slashing regressive forces. “For the past four legislative sessions, advocates in Texas have been fighting back against attempts to ban adoption or foster parenting by lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender couples or individuals,” said Lutes. “While child protection services are praising LGBT foster parents, legislators are trying to take our rights away.” (Cole Krawitz, The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.