

Libertarian Party nominee for president Bob Barr announced that he would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act if he were elected to the White House, according to a speech he delivered at the party's convention on May 25.
"The Defense of Marriage Act insofar has provided the federal government a club to club down rights of law-abiding American citizens, has been abused, misused, and should be repealed, and I will work to repeal it," he said on Sunday.
Barr, 59, authored DOMA in 1996 as a Republican congressman for Georgia's seventh district. In a statement about his support for the California supreme court's recent ruling to allow same-sex marriage, Barr said his original intent in authoring DOMA was to ensure that each state determine whether to legalize same-sex marriage.
"Regardless of whether one supports or opposes same sex-marriage, the decision to recognize such unions or not ought to be a power each state exercises on its own, rather than imposition of a one-size-fits-all mandate by the federal government -- as would be required by a Federal Marriage Amendment, which has been previously proposed and considered by the Congress," he said in the May 25 statement. "The decision today by the supreme court of California properly reflects this fundamental principle of federalism on which our nation was founded."
Barr was first elected to Congress in 1994, serving four terms in a district north of Atlanta. He also played a key role in President Bill Clinton's impeachment hearings. He was defeated in 2002 after district lines were redrawn, forcing him to run against John Linder, a popular fellow Republican, according to The Washington Post.
The Libertarian National Committee's convention took place in Denver, the site of the upcoming Democratic convention this August. More than 650 delegates gathered to choose the candidate in a six-round voting procedure on Sunday afternoon. Barr beat out Mary Ruwart, a research scientist, in the final round. The vote was 324–276, according to the Post. Barr also won over former Democratic presidential nominee Mike Gravel, who left the Democratic Party over dissatisfaction about his lack of coverage by the media as compared to that of other Democratic candidates. Gravel, along with former hopeful and Ohio representative Dennis Kucinich, were the only two vying for the Democratic ticket who fully endorsed federal rights for married same-sex couples.
"I just ended my political career," Gravel said to the Post. "From 15 years old to now, my political career is over, and it's no big deal. I'm a writer, I'm a lecturer, I'm going to push the issues of freedom and liberty. I'm going to push those issues until the day I die." (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.