Woman Who Brought Anti-LGBTQ+ SCOTUS Case Did Make a Wedding Website: Report

There’s more controversy surrounding Colorado web designer Lorie Smith, whose objection to making a hypothetical website for a same-sex couple won over conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices in June. They ruled in favor of her last month in 303 Creative LLC vs. Elenis, opening the door to discrimination against LGBTQ+ people nationwide.

While her case has been criticized for being based on a situation that had not presented itself and for featuring claims on behalf of people who later denied involvement, the high court seems to have cared little about such details when it rendered its decision.

Now comes news that Smith, who claimed that Colorado’s legal landscape made it impossible for her to operate a wedding website design business, had created at least one wedding website in the past. She deleted all references to it from her company’s website before starting her legal campaign against serving the LGBTQ+ community, The New Republic reports.

It was reported previously by the magazine that the site creation request at the center of 303 Creative was fake based on its reporting.

Smith, represented by the right-wing Alliance Defending Freedom, argued that Colorado’s antidiscrimination law curbed her free speech regarding her opposition to same-sex marriage.

Trending stories

Reneé Rapp claps back at critics of her coming-out journey

Out and About with Christian Cooper

Rachel Levine fought HIV & STIs at HHS. Now she’s speaking out because that progress is being undone

How climate disasters hurt mental health in young people

Patti LuPone apologizes to Audra McDonald and Kecia Lewis amid controversy

Paris Hilton is bringing her pop stardom to WeHo Pride and WorldPride

Grindr is reminding us why jockstraps are so sexy and iconic

Two right-wing Supreme Court justices signal they may uphold access to PrEP and more

France becomes world’s first country to enshrine abortion rights in constitution

HRC holds 'die-in' to protest Trump health care cuts

Audra McDonald disputes Patti LuPone 'rift,' hasn't seen her 'in about 11 years'

What is 'limerence' and why are lesbians and sapphics talking about it?

Joe Biden has tied the record for most LGBTQ+ judges confirmed in federal courts

All 6 rogue Mississippi cops got long prison sentences in 'Goon Squad' torture of 2 Black men

Rising star LAVERN says LGBTQ+ ravers 'bring the fire' ahead of EDC performance

More than a stay: Airbnb’s latest release is built for the way we travel today

Breaking down Patti LuPone's latest Broadway controversy—and responses

Mistress Isabelle Brooks on snatching points & wigs: 'I'm your favorite villain'

Wilderness, woods, and Wigstock: Drag icons light up the Catskills

Elon Musk uses burner accounts on X, doesn’t fact-check: report

500,000 Children at Risk: PEPFAR Funding Crisis

26 LGBTQ+ movies & TV shows coming in June 2025 — and where to watch them

Gays went feral at an iconic Pride celebration in Pensacola, Florida

Your guide to all things Pride 2025, from survival tips to the hottest events & more!

'King of Drag's Tenderoni teases game-changing show: 'We exist and we're not going anywhere'

• 0
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8

Smith’s attorneys claimed she was prevented from designing any wedding websites due to state laws, telling the justices, “For six years, she has been unable to speak in the marketplace.”

Ultimately, the court’s conservative wing ruled in favor of Smith, delighting right-wingers and certain religious groups while horrifying LGBTQ+ advocates.

According to a report from The New Republic on Tuesday, a researcher obtained an image of a wedding website designed by Smith around 2015 using the Wayback Machine service from the Internet Archive.

In a bizarre string of 17 back-to-back posts, ADF claimed there was nothing to see there and that Smith was being made to look back by the progressive magazine.

“@NewRepublic is at work manufacturing its FIFTH desperate attack on graphic artist Lorie Smith. Why? To impugn Lorie and delegitimize the landmark #SCOTUS ruling in #303Creative that protects every American’s free speech rights. Lorie has nothing to hide, so here’s the truth,” the group protested before attacking the publication and claiming that she created the websites for her sister as a gift and that because she didn’t charge for it, the site was irrelevant.

“While @NewRepublic’s targeted campaign against Lorie shows no signs of letting up, @ADFLegal and Lorie won’t be deterred. @ADFLegal will continue our important work of defending everyone’s freedom of speech, including those we disagree with,” the group deflected on Twitter.