
CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
The best laid plans.... When Bill Clinton campaigned for president in 1992, he promised to end the military's ban on gay and lesbian soldiers. As everyone knows, that didn't happen and instead for nearly 20 years we've lived with "don't ask, don't tell" -- a shabby compromise that managed to actually accelerate discharges instead of reduce them.
Unlike when President Obama worked to unravel DADT, President Clinton encountered a military and Congress much more resistant to the idea of openly gay men and women serving. When Clinton initiated congressional hearings to end the ban in 1993, former Georgia senator Sam Nunn headed the Senate Committee on Armed Services. Nunn was dead-set against letting gays serve openly, but was more open to gays pretending to not be gay. (Carl Levin, the Michigan senator who now heads up the committee, was much more amenable to letting gays serve openly when Obama applied pressure.)
Realizing he couldn't get Congress or military leaders to get on board with reversing the ban, Clinton worked with military and congressional leaders to craft DADT, which was initially known as "don't ask, don't tell, don't pursue." As a testament to how endemic homophobia was at the time, Clinton said this to reporters in May 1993: "We are trying to work this out so that our country does not... appear to be endorsing a gay lifestyle."
Clinton signed DADT into law in November 1993. "The compromise [permitted] homosexuals to serve in the military so long as they remained silent about their sexual orientation, except in the most private of settings, and did not engage in homosexual acts," according to a New York Times article from November 17, 1993.
Legal challenges greeted the policy almost as soon as it was announced and by 2003, former President Clinton was calling for DADT's death. (Nunn did the same in 2008.) While Obama faced resistance in keeping his promise to kill DADT, he did have one big advantage that Clinton lacked: public sentiment. Only 27% of Americans opposed gays serving openly in the military, according to a 2010 Pew survey--an 18-percentage point drop in opposition since the same survey was conducted 16 years earlier.
Click on the following pages to see how The Advocate handled the DADT issue in 12 covers over the years.
Nbroverman
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
BREAKING: Supreme Court to decide whether states can ban transgender women & girls from sports
July 03 2025 10:02 AM
True
Who was Jimmy Swaggart, the late, anti-LGBTQ+, disgraced televangelist?
July 02 2025 5:40 PM
The deadly 'big beautiful' budget bill will turn America into a morgue
July 02 2025 11:28 AM
Appeals court rules transgender Florida teacher cannot use female pronouns in school
July 04 2025 7:00 AM
How dark will our skies be on July 4, 2026?
July 04 2025 6:00 AM
Queer subtext in Disney's 'Elio' was reportedly cut by Pixar
July 03 2025 12:30 PM
Trending stories
Recommended Stories for You
Neal Broverman
Neal Broverman is the Editorial Director, Print of Pride Media, publishers of The Advocate, Out, Out Traveler, and Plus, spending more than 20 years in journalism. He indulges his interest in transportation and urban planning with regular contributions to Los Angeles magazine, and his work has also appeared in the Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He lives in the City of Angels with his husband, children, and their chiweenie.
Neal Broverman is the Editorial Director, Print of Pride Media, publishers of The Advocate, Out, Out Traveler, and Plus, spending more than 20 years in journalism. He indulges his interest in transportation and urban planning with regular contributions to Los Angeles magazine, and his work has also appeared in the Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He lives in the City of Angels with his husband, children, and their chiweenie.