CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
A bill that would change the way Utah punishes hate crimes is undergoing major revisions as the bill's sponsor works to hammer out a compromise with another lawmaker. Sponsored by Democratic representative David Litvack, House Bill 90 was set for a debate by the state's full house of representatives in Salt Lake City late Wednesday. Instead, it got hung up as Republican representative LaVar Christensen rushed to finish drafting a substitute. Christensen, a longtime opponent of Litvack's hate-crimes bill proposals--this is Litvack's sixth--thinks the state's existing law, which prosecutors have said is unenforceable, needs only a minor tweak. Litvack's current bill would direct judges and the Utah Board of Pardons and Parole to consider evidence of bias or hatred in the selection of a victim when they are sentencing convicted offenders or considering parole for an offender. Neither representative would offer any details of the compromise bill they are now drafting together, although Christensen said the new bill will seek to balance his concerns with Litvack's intentions. Utah law does not technically have a hate-crimes statute, even though it is titled "penalties for hate crimes." The current law is instead a civil rights statute that requires prosecutors to prove that a victim's civil rights, such as voting or attending school, were interrupted by the commission of the crime. Statistics kept by Utah law enforcement dating back to 1998 show the state averages 66 hate crimes a year. In the past, Litvack and others have sought to enhance the penalties for hate crimes by raising the punishment for crimes by one step if bias or prejudice in victim selection could be proved. That approach consistently failed because it included a list of characteristics for which people are typically targeted in bias crimes. Among them was "sexual orientation," which house members would not support because they claimed it would create special rights for gay people. (AP)
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
31 Period Films of Lesbians and Bi Women in Love That Will Take You Back
December 09 2024 1:00 PM
18 of the most batsh*t things N.C. Republican governor candidate Mark Robinson has said
October 30 2024 11:06 AM
True
These 15 major companies caved to the far right and stopped DEI programs
January 24 2025 1:11 PM
True
Latest Stories
Transgender teen can't legally change name until age 21, Mississippi Supreme Court rules
April 18 2025 4:51 PM
Military families sue Trump administration to keep their school system diverse
April 18 2025 2:40 PM
After backlash, Planned Parenthood Arizona resumes gender-affirming care
April 18 2025 2:28 PM
What does WorldPride's travel warning mean for transgender & nonbinary people?
April 18 2025 10:14 AM
Wilton Women’s Week 2025 ushers in a new era of LGBTQ+ empowerment in South Florida
April 18 2025 9:49 AM
Activists stack coffins in front of State Department to protest PEPFAR cuts (in photos)
April 17 2025 3:22 PM
JD Vance wants the UK to repeal its LGBTQ+ hate speech laws to secure a trade deal
April 17 2025 12:37 PM
Chicago Teachers Union ratifies groundbreaking contract cementing LGBTQ+ protections
April 17 2025 7:00 AM
Mahmoud v. Taylor: Everything to know about the Supreme Court case to ban LGBTQ+ books
April 17 2025 6:30 AM
Top 15 safest U.S. cities for LGBTQ+ travel
April 17 2025 6:02 AM