A federal judge
on Friday placed on hold an Oregon domestic-partnership
law that was set to take effect January 1, pending a
February hearing.
The law would
give some spousal rights to same-sex couples.
Opponents asked
U.S. district judge Michael W. Mosman to intercede after
the Oregon secretary of state's office ruled in October that
they had failed to collect enough valid signatures on
petitions to force a referendum on the law.
The Oregon
measure covers benefits related to inheritance rights,
child-rearing and custody, joint state tax filings, joint
health, auto and homeowners' insurance policies,
visitation rights at hospitals, and others. It does
not affect federal benefits for married couples,
including Social Security and joint filing of federal tax
returns.
After the
legislature approved the domestic-partnership law this year,
gay rights opponents launched an effort to collect enough
signatures to suspend the law and place it on the
November 2008 ballot for a statewide vote.
But state
elections officials said this fall that the effort fell 116
valid signatures short of the 55,179 needed to suspend the
law.
In court Friday,
Austin Nimocks, a lawyer for Alliance Defense Fund,
which opposes the measure, said the state's review process
was flawed, disenfranchising citizens who had signed
petitions.
The state's
largest gay rights group, Basic Rights Oregon, criticized
the judge's decision.
''It's unfair our
families once again are bearing the brunt of this
ongoing struggle,'' said Jeana Frazzini, a spokeswoman for
the group.
Eight other
states have approved spousal rights in some form for
same-sex couples -- Connecticut, Vermont, New
Hampshire, New Jersey, Maine, California, Washington,
and Hawaii. Massachusetts is the only state that
allows gay couples to marry. (Sarah Skidmore, AP)