Mich. Gov. Wants to Keep Denying Benefits to Same-Sex Couples

Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder has asked a federal court to allow the state to continue denying domestic-partner benefits to gays and lesbians who work for state and local governments, reports MLive.com.

In a brief filed Friday, Snyder, a Republican, asked U.S. District Judge David Lawson to uphold the state's ban on benefits for same-sex partners of state and municipal employees, hoping to place a stay on Lawson's 2013 ruling that put the law on hold after five same-sex couples sued, claiming it violated their constitutional rights.

Lawson's June ruling determined that Michigan's Public Act 297, which prevents public employers from providing spousal benefits to same-sex partners, likely violated the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution, and issued a temporary injunction ordering the state to stop enforcing the law, according to MLive.

Snyder's motion for summary judgment, filed by Attorney General Bill Schuette, contends that Public Act 297 is a cost-saving measure for the state.

"Public Act 297 is a logical and cohesive part of the effort to reduce costs and to address the fiscal insecurity of local governments that has increased exponentially over the past five years," the state's attorneys wrote in the motion, according to MLive. "It is not singular and does not target same-sex couples."

Trending stories

Gays went feral at an iconic Pride celebration in Pensacola, Florida

Electric Forest is a once-in-a-lifetime experience for everyone in the LGBTQ+ community

Need an escape from American anxiety? Consider Colombia.

Wilderness, woods, and Wigstock: Drag icons light up the Catskills

This HIV Long-Term Survivor Day, listen to this leader from God's Love, We Deliver

Behind ‘King of Drag’s Charles Galin King’s royal assent were two powerful Mexican women (exclusive)

Elon Musk uses burner accounts on X, doesn’t fact-check: report

Joe Biden has tied the record for most LGBTQ+ judges confirmed in federal courts

Why the internet is crashing out over this viral video of a 'couple' cozying up at Coldplay concert

How climate disasters hurt mental health in young people

Checking out: nhow London, the city’s coolest hotel

BREAKING: Supreme Court rules to save free access to preventive care, including PrEP

Long live the kings: The drag revolution you haven't seen on TV — yet

Jennifer Love Hewitt thanks LGBTQ+ fans for 'keeping Julie James alive'

What is ‘compersion’ and why are LGBTQ+ folks more likely to experience it? Sex experts explain

1985: the year the AIDS crisis finally broke through the silence

Fletcher is proud bi and queer women feel 'seen' in 'Boy'

Paige Bueckers finally made it official by revealing that Azzi Fudd is her 'girlfriend'

All 6 rogue Mississippi cops got long prison sentences in 'Goon Squad' torture of 2 Black men

Trump admin guts $258 million in funding for HIV vaccine research

France becomes world’s first country to enshrine abortion rights in constitution

Ranking the highest-earning queens in 'RuPaul's Drag Race' herstory

And the winner of 'RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars 10' is...

VIDEO: A man living with HIV discusses his journey to fatherhood

'Big Easy Queens' is the campy horror film that every drag fan will love

• 0
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8

But Lawson's June injunctive ruling seemed to reject this argument outright, determining that "a desire to save money cannot possibly be sufficiently important to require the court to abstain from deciding the constitutional issues raised by the plaintiffs. If it were, states could effectively insulate themselves from constitutional review by the federal courts of virtually any law by citing budgetary concerns."