Dear Advocate.com readers,
I want to draw your attention to an experimental new feature
on some of our story pages: commenting with Facebook Connect. It's a way to
employ a new Facebook plugin to change the way you can comment on story pages,
and it's one of the many exciting changes that our web editor Lucas Grindley
has implemented to improve your online experience. (And he has many more
exciting changes in store for you, too.)
We're in the experimental phase of implementing this
feature, so we're looking to you to try it out and let us know how it
enhances or diminishes your experience on Advocate.com.
Let's discuss how it works, then we'll get to why we feel
it's a good move for Advocate.com and for you.
If you're logged into Facebook, you'll be able to comment on
stories on Advocate.com without jumping through any additional authentication
hoops. No need to type out a captcha code, no need to log in, no need to
provide an email address. It's faster and easier, and we delight in finding ways
to improve the site's ease of use.
You'll also notice a checkbox asking if you'd like to post
your comment to Facebook. Leave it checked and the comment will post on your
wall. Uncheck it, and it will only show up on Advocate.com. In a function unique
to Facebook Comments, if a friend replies to the comment posted to your
Facebook wall, that reply will also appear on the Advocate.com story page
comment thread -- so the discussion continues in both places. It's a very cool
function that we anticipate will promote dialogue.
Now, the why. Discourse is vital to our freedom and to our
rights. As LGBTs we're not of one mind, and a rich and lively discussion is
integral to understanding the news, politics, and cultural stories of
importance to us. I cannot imagine how much further back our fight for rights
would be if we didn't exercise the freedom to gather and discuss the issues of
the day. And now this vital discourse often happens online, with participants
sometimes a world away from one another.
But not all comments are worthwhile. Some are uselessly
off-topic, but more worryingly, many are hateful. If you've read Advocate.com
for any length of time, you've seen the trolls and have read their cruel and
vindictive comments. This has presented a problem for me as I am reluctant to
censor reader comments, generally feeling that a whole lot of good (freedom of
expression) comes with some of the bad (malicious comments). We've long
maintained a light touch, only pulling down threatening comments or those that would violate someone's privacy.
Web anonymity can foster brutality, and this brand of
negative commenting can be a disheartening and off-putting experience for
well-meaning users, even those who disagree with one another and are poised for
a lively debate. Facebook Comments offers a solution there, as your name and
profile image will appear next to your comment. The general consensus is this
is a troll killer.
Doubtlessly this will raise questions about the anonymity
that many of our readers felt was necessary in the past. We've had a robust
discussion internally about potential losses in interactivity if readers can no
longer post comments anonymously. Were those readers closeted? Were they
fearful of the online equivalent of getting our magazine in the mail without
the opaque wrapper -- of having the postal carrier see your gay magazine? Will
readers go to other web publications if they cannot comment without being
identified?
But I invariably come down on the side of openness. I firmly
believe that being out -- as an LGBT person, or as an equal rights supporter -- is
a fundamentally positive thing. Being out is the most important thing we can do
for ourselves and for future generations of LGBT people. So we're doing our
part to dispense with the Internet closet. Additionally, I have no desire to
make this site a venue for hate speech.
What do you think of this development? Please take the
opportunity to let us know how you feel by commenting here -- and be on the
lookout for this function rolling out on story pages, gradually at first.If you would like to comment on this article without using the Facebook commenting function, please send us an email at feedback@advocate.com.
Matthew Breen
Editor In Chief, The Advocate
Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes