|| News ||
Page 1 of 1

White House Talks DADT With Lieberman


JOE LIEBERMAN X390 (GETTY) | ADVOCATE.COM

Shortly after President Barack Obama pledged Saturday to end “don’t ask, don’t tell” during a speech to the Human Rights Campaign, the Administration’s highest-ranking LGBT official said the White House is speaking with certain senators about strategies for repealing the policy -- specifically Sen. Joseph Lieberman, an independent from Connecticut, who sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“On ‘don’t ask, don’t tell,’ this administration is talking directly to the Hill -- we are in direct discussions with Senator Lieberman,” John Berry, the director of the Office of Personnel Management, told The Advocate following the president's remarks.

A spokesman for Senator Lieberman confirmed that the senator had been speaking to the White House about the bill. “Senator Lieberman has had discussions with representatives of the Administration and others on the best way to reverse this policy, which he has opposed since it was first proposed in 1993,” said Marshall Wittmann, Lieberman’s press secretary. Wittmann gave no further information on the senator’s plans regarding the legislation.

A House repeal bill that was introduced in March is being carried by Rep. Patrick Murphy, a Democrat from Pennsylvania, and currently has 177 cosponsors.

Berry said on Saturday that the goal was to introduce Senate legislation with bipartisan support -- the same goal the late Sen. Edward Kennedy had always hoped to achieve.

People familiar with the strategy around Senate introduction say the discussions generally involve two different tracks: the bipartisan track, with at least one of the cosponsors sitting on the SASC; and a second track, which would be a Democratic introduction by someone who sits on the SASC.

Some reports have mentioned Sen. Jack Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat, as a candidate to sponsor the bill, but a source familiar with discussions who spoke on the condition of anonymity said Reed was not a prime target.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, a New York Democrat, has taken a strong interest in the issue, but the fact that she does not sit on the Armed Services Committee makes her a less likely candidate to carry the bill.

Colorado Democrat Mark Udall is generally considered to be in the running given his position on the committee. During Senate hearings on the Defense Department authorization bill, Udall asked Adm. Mike Mullen to draft recommendations for changing the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy before Senate hearings on the matter this fall.

Lieberman is generally seen as a strong candidate for carrying the bill given his position on the Armed Services Committee and his strong engagement with the military. Insiders also say the senator could use the legislation to burnish his progressive credentials, which might be a consideration for him based on his support for Sen. John McCain during the 2008 election and the fact that he lost his 2006 Democratic primary race to Ned Lamont.

Lieberman also has strong ties to Republican Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, one of whom might consider being his GOP counterpart on a repeal bill. Collins cosponsored Lieberman’s introduction this year of the Domestic Partner Benefits and Obligations Act, which would extend spousal benefits to the same-sex partners of federal government employees.

Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the repeal lobby group Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, said during a symposium two weeks ago that he believed a bill was only weeks from introduction.

Though Sarvis said he preferred a bipartisan track, he added, “A number of other Democrats are ready for bill introduction and I suspect we may soon have a Senate bill introduced.”

Contacted for comment Monday, Sarvis said, “SLDN is working with key senators on Senate Armed Services Committee and believes the White House is actively engaged to help facilitate a timely, bipartisan bill introduction and is also having critically needed repeal discussions within the Pentagon. SLDN is counting on getting repeal done in 2010.”


Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. Page 1 of 1
Reader Comments
  • Name: garychapelhill
    Date posted: 10/13/2009 7:23:56 PM
    Hometown: chapel hill, nc

    Comment:

    Didn't Lieberman endorse that evil Sarah Palin? Now you think you can trust him? They want us to believe that Obama is working on DADT AND they want to rehabilitate Joe Lieberman at the same time. The first is just more hot air, and the second is just plain offensive. A lot of you need to paying much, much closer attention. you're getting bamboozled left and right here.

  • Name: Amanda
    Date posted: 10/13/2009 3:12:09 PM
    Hometown: Santa Barbara

    Comment:

    Curious that we're labeling people who suggest different approaches "Obama-bashers." Seems like everyone, whether they call for an executive order (which would stop losses immediately) or legislative process (which will stop it permanently but is a laborious process that may never see completion) just wants to get rid of a policy that has been proven, thanks to the efforts of research institutions like The Palm Center, to be outdated and detrimental to our armed forces.

  • Name: SteveMD2
    Date posted: 10/13/2009 2:52:41 PM
    Hometown: Baltimore

    Comment:

    When you read mad rants like that of "Name: HERCULE TRIATHLON SAVINIEN"l you understand why we are really fighting 3 wars. One with religious maniacs in Iraq who hate each other due to minor differences in their Muslim Faith - people whom I'm sure the Prophet Mohammed would send to perdition if he returned. The second is the war in Afghanistan. And the third is the war here at home. For it doesn't matter if someone is Muslim, Christian, CAtholic, Jewish etc on this issue The real recognition is that the bible thumpers of all religions are cut from the same mad piece of Cloth. Control freakouts, totally totally selfish, who believe only in what they have been told, and read in ancient texts, There ought to be an uninhabited continent called WARLAND - where we could ship all these people on a one way ticket. And let their sick hate filled mnds drive the murder of each other in their mad religious zeal. It would be a blessing to the world, and God will then Judge them.

  • Name: Ann Glasser
    Date posted: 10/13/2009 2:51:03 PM
    Hometown: Hamden, CT

    Comment:

    I wouldn't trust him for a minute. As a resident of Connecticut, I can assure you that he has the integrity of a weasel (forgive me, weasels).

  • Name: HERCULE TRIATHLON SAVINIEN
    Date posted: 10/13/2009 2:43:05 PM
    Hometown: EL CAJON, SAN DIEGO, CT., CA.

    Comment:

    [DADT] VS [IFF] RECRUITMENT TOOL The plan to do away with don't ask don't tell is the most bone headed idea the Imperial Media Messiah President has ever come up with. The policy should remain as it is for the present, or the [IFF] Islamic Freedom Fighters will simply be given a recruitment tool, Gay Marines are not going to shove an American-Isreali Empire's ideas of equal opportunity down their throats at the end of a bayonet. This is not the time for social engineering in wars on the Islamic Crescent, this can and should wait. Or, the Empire will be at war in [AF-PAK] for a thousand years. Surge, Draft, Bomb, but giving the [IFF] a recruitment tool, after the wars are either won or lost, but not now, this is not about the Empires view of gays in the military this is about the [IFF] and their view. THIS IS A RECRUITMENT TOOL AND GIVING AIDE TO THE [IFF].

  • Name: Bradley Gould
    Date posted: 10/13/2009 2:40:57 PM
    Hometown: Washingtin DC

    Comment:

    Well Well Well, Barney Frank said things like Marches had no effect, and that he wasn't co-sponsoring the House legislation (Even though 177 other congresspeople are) because it wasn't the right time, and besides it wouldn't make it into the Senate. Guess Barney Frank needs to worry less about getting invited to White House lunches and more about how out of touch he is. His anger when talking about the March wasn't the cool logic of somebody that thinks sometihng is a waste of time, it was the fury of somebody in shock that they aren't calling the shots anymore. Finally we have movement, and all it took was a few hundred thousand people gathering at the Capital, rather than waiting for our "Allies" like Frank to spend another 15 years telling us to shut up, be quiet and move to the back of the bus.

  • Name: bob
    Date posted: 10/13/2009 12:01:24 PM
    Hometown: Bloomington

    Comment:

    I cannot wait to hear what the opposition has to say about this one! What will be cast as this time, molestors?...oh no, wait, tried that, not true...how about deviates...no wait, not guilty there either...how about 'homosexuals are not compatible with military service...'...duh, dis proven in our own military not to mention several countries around the world...could it be we really are just like everyone else and ARE good Americans...'me tinkz zoe!'...:)

  • Name: Paul
    Date posted: 10/13/2009 9:40:42 AM
    Hometown: kansas City

    Comment:

    I have a feeling that if Obama did issue a stop loss order, then congress would have a great excuse NOT to take up the issue, because they could say that Obama had taken care of it, and if it comes up again, they'll deal with it. This seems to be the only way to have permanent solution.

  • Name: deb
    Date posted: 10/13/2009 8:15:49 AM
    Hometown: fort wayne

    Comment:

    my comment is just to say i am with you all on this. i am a straight 60+ grandma in full support of gay equal rights for years. i stand firmly and proudly for and with all of you! i am watching obama on this. i have great admiration for obama and am a supporter but this is a potential dealbreaker for me. i agree with Del, we have to allow this to be legislated, an exec order is not going to do it right and i dont see it as a good political move. i know the time is now.

  • Name: Franz
    Date posted: 10/13/2009 3:19:44 AM
    Hometown: Seattle

    Comment:

    He can use executive order until the legislative process is over. I find this "I need pressure to do what's right" absurd. The "legislative process" is what government officials say when they are too coward to call people out and put pressure on it's Congress members to go back home and tell their constituents that discriminating against people is WRONG. PERIOD. That the Republicans wouldn't do much better is a moot issue...who is expecting anything from Republicans? The Democrats are in the majority and they need to get off of their self-righteous ass and do something. The war they said they would end, the healthcare bill they said they would pass, and all the other shit that is more important than DADT and EDNA isn't even getting done. If they think that they are safe in 2010 just look at Reid's numbers in Nevada. People are sick and tired and will toss these dinosaurs out and get some progressive socialist, communist or green members to reign in these neo-liberals.



Don't Miss
  • Best of Broadway How Broadway Does a Flea Market

    Find out why actress Kathleen Chalfant calls the annual Flea Market and Grand Auction in Times Square "the most glamorous flea market you've ever seen." It raised half a million dollars to fight HIV/AIDS.

  • News Is CPAC Illegally Discriminating Against Gays?

    Fred Karger once again isn't being allowed a table at one of the GOP's biggest annual gatherings, and this time he's threatening legal action because he believes he's being discriminated against because he's gay.

  • News Obama Makes the Case for Fairness
     

    He made the case for “a return to the American values of fair play and shared responsibility” — a theme pertinent for an LGBT community facing disproportionate poverty rates and legal barriers to equal rights.

  • Film Mosquita y Mari’s Path to Sundance

    Director Aurora Guerrero talks to The Advocate about the making of her new film and how she believes mainstream media simplifies the lives of LGBT and Latino characters.

  • Film Young & Wild: A Director’s Perspective

    The director and cowriter of Young & Wild, a film about a teen struggling to reconcile her raging sexual drive with an evangelical upbringing, writes about making the film and her own life growing up lesbian in Chile.

  • Arts and Entertainment Hot Sheet

    The top 10 entertainment highlights on our gaydar this week: Ross Mathews takes over, Mrs. Danvers fondles again, while Halston and Carol Channing get documented.

  • Travel Slideshow Flag Gayest Cities in America, 2012

    It's no secret that megalopolises New York City, Chicago, and Los Angeles have robust LGBT life — and we've even heard tell of little queer hoods like the Castro and P-Town. This isn't that list.

 
 
Advocate Subscribe Promo Banner 300x50
 
Follow Us Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterSubscribe to our RSS feedsDownload our app
Facebook Activity
 
COVER 1055 X135 | ADVOCATE.COM
Today's Headlines