|| News ||
1 2 NEXT  Page 1 of 2

DADT in Reid’s Hands


Harry Reid X390 (GETTY) | ADVOCATE.COM

Fearful that delaying action on “don’t ask, don’t tell” until after the midterms could potentially kill the measure for the year, repeal advocates are pushing Senate majority leader Harry Reid to schedule a Senate floor vote on the defense funding bill in September.

“I’m a little anxious,” said Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network. “The reality is the number of legislative days in this Congress are rapidly dwindling, and we need to see that the defense authorization bill up on the Senate floor in September.”

When Congress returns to Washington next week, the Senate will have until October 8 when they leave for the midterms to take the crucial vote on the 2011 National Defense Authorization Act, which contains the provision to repeal “don’t ask, don’t tell.”

But one political operative and repeal advocate noted the bill will be competing for attention with new legislation Democrats are pushing that would provide tax breaks for businesses.

“The Democrats are trying to figure out what they can effectively do in those four weeks to distinguish themselves from Republicans before the midterm elections,” said the source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “The tax cut issue may provide that contrast.”

The source wagered that if the Senate floor vote does not take place before the midterms, the defense funding bill would have a “50-50” shot of passing before the end of this Congress. If it is not finalized by year’s end, the repeal effort will die.

Reid’s spokesman, reiterating statements he made last month, told The Advocate the defense authorization bill stood a chance of being addressed upon lawmakers’ return next week.

“It’s on the list of things we would like to do in the next few weeks,” said Jim Manley.

But it remains to be seen whether Republicans will continue to obstruct the bill and, if they do, whether Democrats have the grit to force the vote through, in which case they will have to produce 60 votes to end debate (reach “cloture”) in order to get the bill to the Senate floor, where it will require 51 votes to pass.

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. 1 2 NEXT  Page 1 of 2
Reader Comments
  • Name: Bill
    Date posted: 9/10/2010 8:31:54 AM
    Hometown: Arlington

    Comment:

    @ pepa - I have more than adequately responded to your hyper-personal rants. You have clearly demonstrated to me and others just what type of person you are.

  • Name: pepa
    Date posted: 9/10/2010 1:51:34 AM
    Hometown: gayrea51.blogspot.com

    Comment:

    @ Bill, I've already debunked everything you said. YOU are the one that calls me a whole swarm of names, fantasizing about my sexuality, making out of this world (yet amusing) claims about me. Bill, I have asked you SERIOUS questions in the comments below. I have offered you SERIOUS insights to your pathetic logic. And it appears that you are too weak to understand these simple logical observations. I use words like drones, and hypocrites based on what YOU write on these boards. I have caught you making very hypocritical comments, and I point them out to you. Of course you are not going to like it. Of course you are going to call me names etc. Because that is what weak minded individuals will do. It seems as though you have giving up and are zeroing in on me personally, that is fine by me. It further proves how desperate you are to even ignore the VERY SAME THINGS YOU SAY TO ME. But go ahead. Your not hurting me, just making yourself look even stupider.

  • Name: Bill
    Date posted: 9/9/2010 11:56:13 PM
    Hometown: Arlington

    Comment:

    @ pepa - "Methinks thou doth protest too much." Your posts are a string on non-sequiturs combined with your usual name-calling and personal attacks -- the very things you accuse others of doing. And then you hide behind a ridiculous blog -- with a readership of one -- that you developed to attack those that you don't like. I don't see a lot of brainpower. Also, you continue to repeat the same words: girl, drone, and hypocrite. If you want to be taken seriously, then present serious commentary, not mindless dribble. You are like so many lawyers that I known, overly sensitive of their own rights, but grievously insensitive of others.

  • Name: pepa
    Date posted: 9/9/2010 4:12:02 PM
    Hometown: gayrea51.blogspot.com

    Comment:

    @ Bill, BTW you say: "You must certainly believe that motivations and life are just more complex then you give credit." -- Then under that logic one must not be surprised if DADT repeal falls through the cracks and your lib friends in the Senate do nothing about it, then heck it must be because "motivations and life are just more complex than I give credit..." Right? So Bill, if it does fail I do expect you NOT to be angry, surprised, or even upset that DADT was not repeal. Basically this article is preparing all of us for such a possible upset and so is your commentary. In essence, Bill DOESN'T care whether DADT is repealed or not and he DOESN'T care about gay soldiers being discharged because of their sexual orientation because we must understand "that motivations and life are just more complex then we give credit." So there. LOL.

  • Name: pepa
    Date posted: 9/9/2010 4:00:32 PM
    Hometown: gayrea51.blogspot.com

    Comment:

    @Bill, "I'm just not interested in it." -- LOL You accuse me of being "unclear" yet here you go writing a totally unclear comment as your not interested in engaging with me while at the same time responding to my comment. All you are doing is complaining and whining like a little girl about my comment. Are they too much for you? Does reality hurt your little feelings? Why don't you ever address my points? 95% of your commentary is either personal childish insults, whining and bitching that I even bring up such points, complaining that I comment etc blah blah. Lets make it easy on you Billy, why did YOU support a party that DOES NOT care either way about gay rights? Answer that one. OR maybe you did not. If you did not, which party did you end supporting then? The GOP? The Greens? LOL. Or quite impossible, my party (The LP)? OR did you sit on your ass the whole entire time during the election? If so, not sure why you even complain in the first place.

  • Name: Greg
    Date posted: 9/9/2010 9:25:47 AM
    Hometown: Providence RI

    Comment:

    Getting rid of DADT won't lose ANY votes they haven't already lost. (About 50% of Republican voters favor DADT repeal too!) But I suppose Reid and the rest of the cowardly Democrats won't see it that way. Reid has to vote-scrounge in Nevada against Crazy Lady so he probably won't go for this.

  • Name: aaron hunt
    Date posted: 9/9/2010 8:57:03 AM
    Hometown: washington

    Comment:

    that ship sailed along time ago! Obama, Reid and the rest of the Dems don't give a rats a.. about gays. And all you politicos, members of the gay political "elite" and wannabes... how many times do you need to be sold down the river before you learn.

  • Name: Keith
    Date posted: 9/9/2010 1:33:57 AM
    Hometown: Tallahassee

    Comment:

    If any gay issue is "in Harry Reid's hands" then we are in deep voo-doo. And that is exactly where we are. The Dems are going to lose big in November and deserve it! I have voted Dem since 1984 only because the gay issue. And where has it gotten me? Still being dragged along under the bus. I will be hard pressed to vote for a Dem again. I am FED UP. Gay people in this country are not going to get equal treatment until the Republicans change their minds. Bash Cheney all you want but on gay issues he is superior to Obama who thinks we deserve second class treatment and then will not even do anything to get us the 2nd class treatment. Remember he is for "civil unions"? Well what has he done to get us even civil unions? Civil unions presumably on the state and local level ---where they give none of the 1100+ benefits of marriage.

  • Name: Nyssa
    Date posted: 9/9/2010 1:21:35 AM
    Hometown: McAllen

    Comment:

    Hey I voted for Gore and Clinton. For sure we would not have had this mess and we would not be in wars, and by this time we would have had our rights. Only if we had a time machine. But I will vote based on my principles. I will vote on those that support us and our community. So I cannot be in that equation. But I will vote for my rights to be heard and be counted for. Seriously people voting for the shiny toy is not a good idea. Voting for the person that will fight for your rights and be by our side for years and perhaps decades is the right way to go. Voting on a popularity contest will not get you no where ten years down the road. Its a matter of principles and not that of verbage that will get things done. Beautiful words but the lack of action has me reflecting that this election is on a thin wire so either they step up for us or consider 2012 gone and really Hillary someone with that caliber please run this country to what is our rights and our civil liberties!

  • Name: Brian
    Date posted: 9/9/2010 12:13:51 AM
    Hometown: Los Angeles

    Comment:

    While I think it is too bad for the country that it appears the republicans are back in a big way, I won't be feeling sorry for any of the losing democrats on election night. They governed as cowards and we will need to rebuild this party. Hopefully they will learn that throwing your base under the bus is not the best strategy for governing. The democratic party needs a shakeup from top to bottom. It will be interesting to see if any party leaders step up to give Obama the truth - he is a liability that cannot win in 2012. This guy will go down in history as too small for the times, we needed someone big like a TR, FDR, LBJ, JFK but ended up with Herbert Hoover. Unbelievable!!



Don't Miss
  • Best of Broadway Smash: Why You Will Love It

    Craig Zadan and Neil Meron, two of the producers of NBC’s new critically acclaimed musical series, explain why the backstage drama of creating a musical about Marilyn Monroe has mass appeal and why big stars like Anjelica Huston, Uma Thurman, Bernadette Peters, and Nick Jonas were eager to appear in it.

  • Best of Broadway How Broadway Does a Flea Market

    Find out why actress Kathleen Chalfant calls the annual Flea Market and Grand Auction in Times Square "the most glamorous flea market you've ever seen." It raised half a million dollars to fight HIV/AIDS.

  • Travel Slideshow Flag Gayest Cities in America, 2012

    It's no secret that megalopolises New York City, Chicago, and Los Angeles have robust LGBT life — and we've even heard tell of little queer hoods like the Castro and P-Town. This isn't that list.

 
 
Advocate Subscribe Promo Banner 300x50
 
Follow Us Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterSubscribe to our RSS feedsDownload our app
Facebook Activity
 
COVER 1055 X135 | ADVOCATE.COM
Today's Headlines