Oregon lawmakers
couldn't agree on one of the biggest issues during the
2005 session--civil unions for same-sex couples. The
legislature is adjourned now, but that issue isn't
going away any time soon. Gay rights activists say
they are already looking at their next steps, which could
include taking the civil unions issue directly to voters and
targeting house speaker Karen Minnis and other civil
union opponents in the 2006 legislative races.
Hundreds of
people attended emotional public hearings that preceded the
Oregon senate's passage of a bill sought by Gov. Ted
Kulongoski to let gay couples form civil unions, which
would have allowed them to gain most of the benefits
of marriage. The measure was stopped cold in the house,
where house speaker Karen Minnis and other Republicans
argued that the bill would violate the spirit of a
constitutional ban on gay marriage, which was enacted
by Oregon voters last fall.
Members of Basic
Rights Oregon, the state's leading gay rights group,
will spend the next month or so formulating plans for a
continuation of the battle. "We are not giving up, and
we are not going away," said Roey Thorpe, the group's
executive director.
One possible
option being considered is to take the civil unions issue to
voters as an initiative measure next year, Thorpe said. The
downside of that strategy is that a ballot measure
campaign dealing with gay rights could be "costly and
divisive," she said. On the other hand, public opinion
polls have shown growing public support for allowing civil
unions, she added. "A ballot measure might not have been a
reasonable option a few years ago, but it might become
one now," Thorpe said.
Any such
initiative campaign likely would encounter tough resistance
from the group that led the effort to ban same-sex
marriage in last November's election. The Defense of
Marriage Coalition, which was formed by the Oregon
Family Council, showed its political horsepower last year
when it gathered 244,000 petition signatures in just
five weeks to place the same-sex marriage ban before
voters in November.
Tim Nashif,
political director for the Family Council, indicated the
group would put the same amount of effort into a campaign to
defeat anything similar to the senate bill, which he
said was worded so broadly and amended so many
existing statutes that the civil unions would have
been "marriage by another name."
"If they put
something like Senate Bill 1000 on the ballot, we are
going to make sure Oregonians are educated about what it
does," Nashif said.
Thorpe,
meanwhile, said Basic Rights Oregon is also looking at
getting more involved in legislative races next year,
both in helping lawmakers who were sympathetic to the
civil unions bill and working to defeat those who
opposed it--especially Minnis, the house speaker. "It
should come as no great surprise if we decide to
target the one person who stood between right and
wrong," Thorpe said of Minnis. (AP)