The attorney for
a University of North Dakota choir director who
claims he is being fired because he's gay wants a judge to
stop an ongoing appeal hearing and start the process over.
Henry Howe's petition in district court argues
that the hearing for assistant music professor Anthony
Reeves is unfair and in violation of North
Dakota Board of Higher Education policies. Howe said a
committee of tenured faculty members who will make a
recommendation to UND president Charles Kupchella are
not trained in law and need a hearing officer to
advise them. "I think we have to start over," Howe
said. "The process has been so tainted at this point and so
damaged, that we would literally have to recall every witness."
Howe said the committee relies too much on
university lawyer Julie Evans for advice, creating a
conflict of interest.
Committee chairman Doug Munski said the group
has been "operating in good faith all along.... We are
an advisory body. We favor neither the institution nor
Dr. Reeves."
The hearing started last week and is continuing
this week. It was scheduled to resume Friday night.
More than 30 witnesses have yet to testify.
UND officials say Reeves demonstrated a pattern
of unacceptable behavior, including failing to
maintain boundaries with students. They also say
Reeves violated the faculty harassment policy by making
sexually based and demeaning comments to students and
that he was inconsistent as a conductor and teacher.
Reeves denies the allegations and says he is
being fired because he is gay and because of his
attempt to adopt a 19-year-old gay student who was
having problems.
Reeves is on administrative leave with pay while
he appeals his possible termination. "I'm very
saddened by a lot of the testimony I am hearing," he
said after Tuesday's proceedings. "There is another
side coming from eyewitnesses...who will refute all of these
charges that have been leveled against us." (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.