Religious
conservatives attacked what they called the "gay
agenda" in Washington, D.C., this week at a conference
dedicated to injecting Christian values into the 2006
election campaign. The two-day conference, titled "The
War on Christians and the Values Voters of 2006,"
hoped to restore Judeo-Christian values to government
and the country.
Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council said
that while his organization does not hate gay people,
it believes families should be based only on
traditional married unions that can bear children. But
Sprigg and other activists condemned what they called the
"gay agenda." They said liberal groups promote not
just acceptance but affirmation and celebration of gay
life as normal and even desirable.
The right-wing Cybercast News Service reports
that the leaders debated whether gays should be
referred to as homosexuals or sodomites and whether
they should express opposition to just homosexual behavior
or to hate the sinner as well. They produced a "Values
Voters Contract With Congress," similar to the 1994
"Contract With America," outlining conservative values
they want lawmakers to implement in the new Congress.
And they called on President Bush to talk more about a
federal marriage amendment banning same-sex marriage.
The Reverend Lou Sheldon of the Traditional
Values Coalition said Christians have fared poorly in
recent years because they are nice guys and nice guys
finish last. (Sirius OutQ News)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.