A Manhattan gay man's conviction on lewd behavior was overturned by a New Jersey appeals court Monday, prompting a gay rights advocate to call for an investigation of police procedure.
After exposing himself to a plainclothes officer, Joseph Mamone was arrested on June 9, 2004, at New Jersey's Palisades Interstate Park. Mamone claimed he went to the park—which is known as a heavy cruising area—simply to have lunch but that park officer Thomas Rossi made his interest in Mamone clear and suggested they walk to a shaded area. Mamone testified that Rossi asked him, "What are you into?" and told him "to take it out" before Rossi exposed himself and was subsequently arrested.
The gay rights organization Garden State Equality has complained that the park unfairly targets "men they perceive to be gay" in their sting operations.
"The issue is not lewd behavior, which we positively do not condone," Garden State Equality's Steven Goldstein told The [Newark] Star-Ledger. "The issue here is disparate treatment. The problem is that the Palisades Park police have gone out of their way to bait gay people in a way they have not baited straight people. Without doubt, my organization is going to call for a public inquiry and possible charges with regard to the police officer."
Rossi was not allowed to speak to the press, but Det. Nelson Pagan, a spokesman for the Palisades Interstate Park Police, told the Star-Ledger, "We do not pick on gays. We go up there and enforce the law on deviant acts."
Mamone's conviction was upheld by two courts before the appeals court ruled in his favor. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.