
.jpg)
After a performance in Thursday night's HRC/Logo presidential forum in Los Angeles that was universally panned by media outlets including NPR and The New York Times, New Mexico governor Bill Richardson requested an interview with The Advocate to explain what he was thinking when he said that being gay was a "choice" versus a biological predisposition.
Richardson clearly wanted to make amends with the gays and lesbians, but he seemed beleaguered after a long day of trying to heal the wounds left by last night's forum. Perhaps the most illuminating part of our 20-minute interview at The Advocate's offices came at the end, during informal banter as the governor prepared to leave. Referring back to a question I'd asked earlier in the interview about his possible lack of empathy for a fundamental LGBT concern, he asked, "But you think I didn't come across with much empathy [last night]?" It was a rare, humanizing comment from a presidential candidate who was clearly grappling with the chasm between how he sees himself versus how others view him—in this case, gay and lesbian voters.
The Advocate:
What happened last night when you were asked whether
being gay was a matter of choice or biology and you said
that it was the former?
Richardson: I misunderstood the question, and I
made a mistake in the way I answered it. I thought it was a
trick question. I made a mistake and I apologize.
I've always understood that [being gay is biological], I just haven't thought about that in a very long time. Again, I'm very action-oriented. I deal with getting things done for gay and lesbian people, as I have as a governor. And I fully understand that it's something you're born with and it's not a lifestyle choice. I've always understood that, but when you're flying all night from New Hampshire as I had—we're human too. We flew all night to get here. That shouldn't be an excuse. I am here in a symbolic visit to The Advocate to say I misunderstood the question, I handled it in a bad way, and I caused a lot of confusion. But my main message is that I should be judged by my actions, on what I've done, not words that don't accomplish anything, that had been misunderstood.
You also said that if the New Mexico state
legislature passed a bill to legalize same-sex marriage,
you wouldn't sign it. Why?
What I would sign is a civil unions bill with
full marriage rights. That's what I would sign. But
that's not the issue. The issue is, what can I get
done in my legislature. I was unable in a special session to
get done a domestic-partnership bill, and we lost by one
vote in the regular session. But then I called special
session a few days later to deal with the full
domestic-partnership bill. No other governor has ever
done that. It failed, so I'm going to bring it up in January
again in the new legislative session.
As a purely hypothetical question, if the
legislature handed you a marriage bill, would you sign it?
I'm going to answer it hypothetically: It's not
going to happen. What I want to emphasize is that I
would be a president who recognizes that the country
is on a path to full inclusion, and I think what we need to
concentrate on is what is doable now. What is doable now is
the following: First, repealing [the Defense of
Marriage Act], which I said I would do. Secondly,
repealing "don't ask, don't tell." I voted to do that
in the Congress [Richardson is a former U.S. representative
from New Mexico] when I was the chief deputy whip. I
felt that was a vote of conscience. Third, repeal No
Child Left Behind, which has some diversity provisions
that basically discriminate against gay kids.
What I would also do is a full civil unions bill with full marriage rights. I think that is achievable with a combination of Republicans and Democrats. A hate crimes law. I think the country today needs to be brought along on a whole range of these issues.
My message is that I should be judged by my action and not by a word that I misunderstood.
If you were elected president and you could change
something immediately for gays and lesbians by executive
order, what would you do?
Immediately, in the federal workforce,
nondiscrimination, as I did in New Mexico, on the
basis of employment, insurance, full partnerships for gays
and lesbians in the federal workforce.
So, basically, employment nondiscrimination and
partnership benefits for federal employees?
I think that could be done by executive order.
Now, unlike [what] Edwards [has said], you can't
repeal "don't ask, don't tell" by executive order.
You've got to go through the Congress because it was made
into a congressional act.
I understand what you're saying about your record
on LGBT issues, but I respectfully think you came off
last night as lacking a little bit of empathy for
gays and lesbians. Even with your record, can you
expect the community to get behind you if they perceive
you that way?
I became very engaged in gay and lesbian issues
when a good friend of mine, who was one of my workers
in my congressional campaign [in the early 1980s], by
the name of Billy Griego, got involved in helping me,
and he then died of AIDS. That's when I felt a real
recognition and empathy for gay issues, because of my
friendship with him. Years later, with the [state]
legislature, I named an initiative that I pursued, which
was more funding and a new structure to deal with AIDS at
the state level, the Billy Griego HIV Act.
Regarding the maricón comment you made
on the Don Imus show, the native Spanish speakers I've
asked all say it's a derogatory term for gays. But
you've indicated that maricón is just
a term for homosexuality and doesn't have a
negative connotation. Do you want to clarify?
I also said I shouldn't have used that word. It
was at the end of an interview and I was goaded into
doing that, and I shouldn't have said it. But in my
day, and I'm older than most, there was no such word as
faggot. It was more in the sense of being
demeaning to someone, more of a pejorative term that was not
given the connotation that it has now. But if you look
at the transcript of that show, I was goaded into
saying it because Imus was trying to stipulate that
I'm Hispanic. It was wrong and I apologize.
Any final thoughts, Governor?
I hope the gay and lesbian community supports my
candidacy and doesn't judge me on the basis of one
silly misunderstanding that I take full responsibility
for. They should look at the record and what I've done and
what I can potentially bring the country in pursuing equal
rights for everybody. I came here today to send this message.
Kerry Eleveld is the news editor of The
Advocate.
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.