Continental promo
||  News  ||
 
June 25, 2008

GLAAD: FX Keeps Antigay Comments on 30 Days

GLAAD: FX Keeps Antigay Comments on 30 Days

The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation issued a press release Tuesday urging community members to contact FX Networks to express concern about a defamatory claim by an antigay activist that was featured uncensored, and unchallenged, on the June 24 episode of 30 Days. The show "examines social issues in America by immersing individuals in a life that requires them to see the world through another’s eyes,’" according to the show’s website.

In an episode titled "Same-Sex Parenting," Kati, a woman who is opposed to gays having families, lives for 30 days with gay parents Dennis and Thomas and their four adopted sons.

The episode includes a defamatory statement by Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council, who, according to GLAAD's press release, is quoted as saying: "Homosexuality is associated with higher rates of sexual promiscuity, sexually transmitted diseases, mental illness, substance abuse, domestic violence, and child sexual abuse, and those are all reasons for us to be concerned about placing children into that kind of setting."

After reviewing a screener supplied by FX Networks, GLAAD and the Family Equality Council, a national nonprofit working to ensure equality for LGBT families, contacted FX, requesting that the inaccurate claim be removed from the episode or that a credible social science expert be brought in to provide an on-air correction.

FX Networks refused to remove the statement or address it during the course of the episode.

GLAAD, the Family Equality Council, and Children of Lesbians and Gays Everywhere are urging their members and the community to contact FX Networks and 20th Century Fox to express their concerns over the network's providing a platform for such an inaccurate, misleading claim by the Family Research Council:

Jeffrey Glaser, senior vice president, current programming, 20th Century Fox Television, Inc., (310) 369-0211, jeffrey.glaser@fox.com.

Nick Grad, executive vice president of original programming, FX Networks, (310) 369-0949, ngrad@fxnetworks.com.

Chuck Saftler, executive vice president of programming, FX Networks, (310) 369-0949, csaftler@fxnetworks.com.

Scott Seomin, vice president of public relations, FX Networks, (310) 369-0938, sseomin@fxnetworks.com.

Read our Advocate.com exclusive interview with Dennis and Thomas here. (The Advocate)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: Jack Henry
    Date posted: 2008-06-27 11:48 AM
    Hometown: LA

    Comment:

    FX anti-gay? Pleez. Nip/Tuck is one of the gayest shows on TV. On 30 Days it seemed that the truth of the gay couple's lives more than countered the lunacy of the woman who stayed with them. I think Spurlock was letting actions speak louder than the words.


  • Name: Don
    Date posted: 2008-06-26 5:03 PM
    Hometown: puerto vallarta, mexico

    Comment:

    I can't believe so many of you (us) are watching anything on ANY Fox-owned channel! The News Corp/The New York Post/Fox Corp/20th Century Fox/Rupert Murdoch HATE US!!! Why put more money in Rupert's pocket to be used as ammunition aimed at the glbt community. BOYCOTT THE NEWS CORP, et.al.!!!!!


  • Name: Victor
    Date posted: 2008-06-26 3:44 PM
    Hometown: Virginia

    Comment:

    I watched the episode last night, and being a documentary filmmaker myself, I do believe there should have been a counter-opinion to Peter Sprigg's statement, as well as another grown-up that could say GOOD things about having been raised by gay parents. Instead they showed a woman whose parents clearly went over the line of parents by talking about sex at the table; it doesn't matter if they were gay men or not. We all know there are tons of poorly raised kids by heterosexual marriages. Still, I think that Spurlock, who I am a fan of, did the best he could. He may have very well wanted Kati to "open her eyes" a little more, that usually is the point of the show. It happened in the other season when a homophobic guy from Michigan spent 30 days with a gay guy in the Castro. Of course, I had concerns about that one as well. Why Castro? How about have him spend 30 days with someone in his own town 3 or 4 doors down? He probably has best friends who are gay and he doesn't even know it.


  • Name: Victor
    Date posted: 2008-06-26 3:44 PM
    Hometown: Virginia

    Comment:

    I watched the episode last night, and being a documentary filmmaker myself, I do believe there should have been a counter-opinion to Peter Sprigg's statement, as well as another grown-up that could say GOOD things about having been raised by gay parents. Instead they showed a woman whose parents clearly went over the line of parents by talking about sex at the table; it doesn't matter if they were gay men or not. We all know there are tons of poorly raised kids by heterosexual marriages. Still, I think that Spurlock, who I am a fan of, did the best he could. He may have very well wanted Kati to "open her eyes" a little more, that usually is the point of the show. It happened in the other season when a homophobic guy from Michigan spent 30 days with a gay guy in the Castro. Of course, I had concerns about that one as well. Why Castro? How about have him spend 30 days with someone in his own town 3 or 4 doors down? He probably has best friends who are gay and he doesn't even know it.


  • Name: Jay
    Date posted: 2008-06-26 12:30 PM
    Hometown: Burbank

    Comment:

    Sean - my reference was not to suggest that presenting both sides on the program would be so, but that forcing the network to alter content to suit our viewpoint would be. Hope that clarifies. I honestly though the show did a good job at showing the various viewpoints. This was about experience as opposed to scientifically controlled research, and thus anecdotal evidence was perfectly appropriate for both sides, in my opinion.


  • Name: Mario
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 9:08 PM
    Hometown: Chapel Hill, NC

    Comment:

    Also I found it interesting - and touching in a twisted way - that the most hostile pro-gay people Kati met were the straight (and formerly somewhat homophobic) family of one of the adopted children. And she couldn't understand why her working, essentially, to put those children back into foster care, might anger these parents. Why can't we be friends, even tho I'm working to break up your families?! Typical Christian entitlement - we need to respect *their* beliefs while they not only don't respect ours, but they want to actively oppress us and interfere in our personal lives.


  • Name: Mario
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 9:06 PM
    Hometown: Chapel Hill, NC

    Comment:

    While I thought it would have been better to counter that claim directly, I thought the show did a good job of showing that claim to be without a very strong foundation by showing numerous happy gay families (parents and children), and straight advocates who argued that gay parents can be great parents and that loving families are definitely better than foster care. I also thought that the episode could have used someone mentioning the fact that homophobic people wanting to deny gay couples children because of the negative impact of homophobia is just circular. She teared up because their children had to decide whether to tell their friends about their two dads – but she didn’t realize that it was people like her who created that situation. Without homophobia there would be no need to “come out”. And the claims about negative things associated with homosexuality? The element of truth is that some of those things *are* associated with being gay - in a homophobic society.


  • Name: Bobby
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 8:42 PM
    Hometown: Jacksonville, FL

    Comment:

    Come on people, lighten up. I bet there are Christians out there who are all up in arms about how 30 Days made Kati look like a victim for her "suffering" and "mental torture" at the hands of her gay hosts. I felt that FX showed a pretty balanced view of gay adoption and a person who is opposed to it. There is probably nothing that the network could have said or shown that would please everyone. Has any other major network done this type of story and "got it all fair and balanced"? I understand we are a persecuted group, but doesn't it make your shoulders sore if you NEVER let that chip rest on the ground, even for a few minutes of relief?


  • Name: Sean S.
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 6:44 PM
    Hometown: Columbia, SC

    Comment:

    There is nothing "gestapo" like about countering inaccurate and factually untrue medical information. I would lose my clinical social work license if I were to suggest or make a statement to a patient that was not supported by medical or scientific evidence. Theres no reason why other people, whom have NO medical background or training at all, should not have similar restrictions and regulations. Why is it that someone who puts Rev. in front of their names allowed to make medical diagnoses and recommendations that someone else would lost their board certification for?


  • Name: Jay
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 3:33 PM
    Hometown: Burbank

    Comment:

    Mr. Sullivan - you're more than welcome to your opinion as am I. I'll keep it civil and polite. I saw the show and the quote in question was hardly indicative of the tone of the week's experiment. Somebody from the Family Research Council said something insulting and ill-researched about gay people. Are we surprised? Of course it's crap and it's untrue. Still, it is not the responsibility of FX to give an opposing, GLAAD-approved counterpoint soundbite. We can't gestapo our way to equality and acceptance.


  • Name: Chris Sullivan
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 2:26 PM
    Hometown: Chicago, IL

    Comment:

    You don't see the smoke here? Honey, take off your rose-colored Elton John glasses!


  • Name: Jay
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 1:01 PM
    Hometown: Burbank

    Comment:

    Maybe Morgan Spurlock (who is definitely NOT anti-gay and curiously not mentioned in GLAAD's press release) felt that the premise of the show: that is, people walking another's shoes for 30 days was a strong enough statement that at least there's two sides to every story. I'm not seeing the smoke here.


  • Name: Chris Sullivan
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 12:19 PM
    Hometown: Chicago, IL

    Comment:

    It's time to boycott! MOney speaks volumes in showbiz!


  • Name: Chris Sullivan
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 12:17 PM
    Hometown: Chicago, IL

    Comment:

    If the FX channel knew of the comments being made and didn't at least provide a platform for a counter-balancing point of view - tehy deserve every bit of criticism that comes there way. I've stopped watching FX until the GLBT community receives an apology.


  • Name: Ang
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 10:29 AM
    Hometown: Atlanta

    Comment:

    Mike, "gay-friendly, democratic president" ? Who would that be? Obama, who barnstormed SC with Donnie McClurkin? The man who is on record as saying marriage is between a man and a woman? Not even a hint of equivocation in that statement. He may be better for us than McCain, but lets not kid ourselves into thinking we have a "friend".


  • Name: Dave J
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 10:25 AM
    Hometown: New York City

    Comment:

    Isn't Scott Seomin a former GLAAD Director?


  • Name: christy
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 9:15 AM
    Hometown: gainesville, fl

    Comment:

    I didn't get a "friendly" vibe from Nip/Tuck.


  • Name: ALR
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 8:26 AM
    Hometown: Midwest

    Comment:

    I watched the episode and was stunned to here that what seemed to me to be homosexuals placed in the same box as child abusers! But I think the only mistake was FX didn't supply another point of view. I don't believe FX to be anti-gay, as there have been other gay affirming shows, scenes, and the like appearing on their air (i.e. Nip/Tuck). I actually thought that, thought they had difference of opinions, it was done respectfully. I wish more gay people were as calm as what Thomas and Dennis were (at least the portions that we saw). As well as, I wish that presumably Christian community would be a little more open to investigate and learn (or try in this case) such as Kati. It wasn't the perfect show...but I thought it got its point across.


  • Name: Mike Scott
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 1:33 AM
    Hometown: Richardson, TX

    Comment:

    Yes, FX is very anti-gay. I'm sure the veeps jumped on this opportunity to give their "religous nut" cohorts a platform by which to spew their hate and lies. I'm sure it was politically motivated with the very real threat of a gay-friendly, democratic president preventing them from controlling how people live and forcing people to share their misery. It won't work though. People know they are a bunch of nuts, and won't even listen to what they have to say, so they are just "pissing in the wind"!


  • Name: Rich Sutton
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 12:53 AM
    Hometown: Saint Louis

    Comment:

    My partner and I are parents. We have spent the last 8 years telling our son that God created our family, because he did. And it is a beautiful family, loving, compasionate, involved in our community, educated, tax paying, etc. We are extremely offended by these comments but not supprised considering the source. We think the lack of action by FX is as offensive as the comments made by Sprigg. Homophobia is real, and is only perpetuated by this type of language. We pray to the same God as the Family Research Council. He teaches our family to love each other and that it is not our place to judge. How do they sleep at night? Please pray for them, we are.


  • Name: Danyelle
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 12:51 AM
    Hometown: Allendale, MI

    Comment:

    I couldn't believe when I watched that episode tonight and they quoted The Family Research Council without any backup or anything from the other side. Great- anyone who watched that show thinks all gay parents abuse their kids, make them sexually promiscuous, and some how give them a mental illnesses. Thanks 30 Days, for making it even harder to be gay in America!


  • Name: Rick
    Date posted: 2008-06-24 10:37 PM
    Hometown: Charlotte, NC

    Comment:

    It is important that LGBT people respond to this act by the FX Network. Comments such as these cannot go unchallenged. FX needs to hear from all of us.


  • Name: pete
    Date posted: 2008-06-24 10:23 PM
    Hometown: palm springs

    Comment:

    fx is anti-gay anyway, isn't it?


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • View From the Hill: The End of DADT?
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed that lawyers are exploring ways to ease enforcement of the military's gay ban, but cautioned that the law doesn't leave much wiggle room. He need look no further than DOD history for a lesson in altering the policy.
  • Hot Sheet: Week of July 5
    When you get back from that big 4th of July barbecue, unwind with Sacha Baron Cohen's Bruno and your favorite B-movie-mocking, basic cable robots.
  • Hungry Like the Wolf
    A master of viola, ukulele, piano, and harp, Patrick Wolf is a music prodigy -- one who, the night before this interview, spit on a cop and got himself arrested.
  • Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
    Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.
  • The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
    With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.
  • Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
    After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.
  • The Pride of Antwerp
    Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.
  • Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
    In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.
  • Top Political Blogs
    From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.
  • The Diva of French Television
    A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.