GLAAD: FX Keeps Antigay Comments on 30 Days  | News | Advocate.com

Advocate.com health Channel
||  News  ||
 
June 25, 2008
GLAAD: FX Keeps Antigay Comments on 30 Days
GLAAD: FX Keeps Antigay Comments on 30 Days

The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation issued a press release Tuesday urging community members to contact FX Networks to express concern about a defamatory claim by an antigay activist that was featured uncensored, and unchallenged, on the June 24 episode of 30 Days. The show "examines social issues in America by immersing individuals in a life that requires them to see the world through another’s eyes,’" according to the show’s website.

In an episode titled "Same-Sex Parenting," Kati, a woman who is opposed to gays having families, lives for 30 days with gay parents Dennis and Thomas and their four adopted sons.

The episode includes a defamatory statement by Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council, who, according to GLAAD's press release, is quoted as saying: "Homosexuality is associated with higher rates of sexual promiscuity, sexually transmitted diseases, mental illness, substance abuse, domestic violence, and child sexual abuse, and those are all reasons for us to be concerned about placing children into that kind of setting."

After reviewing a screener supplied by FX Networks, GLAAD and the Family Equality Council, a national nonprofit working to ensure equality for LGBT families, contacted FX, requesting that the inaccurate claim be removed from the episode or that a credible social science expert be brought in to provide an on-air correction.

FX Networks refused to remove the statement or address it during the course of the episode.

GLAAD, the Family Equality Council, and Children of Lesbians and Gays Everywhere are urging their members and the community to contact FX Networks and 20th Century Fox to express their concerns over the network's providing a platform for such an inaccurate, misleading claim by the Family Research Council:

Jeffrey Glaser, senior vice president, current programming, 20th Century Fox Television, Inc., (310) 369-0211, jeffrey.glaser@fox.com.

Nick Grad, executive vice president of original programming, FX Networks, (310) 369-0949, ngrad@fxnetworks.com.

Chuck Saftler, executive vice president of programming, FX Networks, (310) 369-0949, csaftler@fxnetworks.com.

Scott Seomin, vice president of public relations, FX Networks, (310) 369-0938, sseomin@fxnetworks.com.

Read our Advocate.com exclusive interview with Dennis and Thomas here. (The Advocate)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: Jack Henry
    Date posted: 2008-06-27 11:48 AM
    Hometown: LA

    Comment:

    FX anti-gay? Pleez. Nip/Tuck is one of the gayest shows on TV. On 30 Days it seemed that the truth of the gay couple's lives more than countered the lunacy of the woman who stayed with them. I think Spurlock was letting actions speak louder than the words.


  • Name: Don
    Date posted: 2008-06-26 5:03 PM
    Hometown: puerto vallarta, mexico

    Comment:

    I can't believe so many of you (us) are watching anything on ANY Fox-owned channel! The News Corp/The New York Post/Fox Corp/20th Century Fox/Rupert Murdoch HATE US!!! Why put more money in Rupert's pocket to be used as ammunition aimed at the glbt community. BOYCOTT THE NEWS CORP, et.al.!!!!!


  • Name: Victor
    Date posted: 2008-06-26 3:44 PM
    Hometown: Virginia

    Comment:

    I watched the episode last night, and being a documentary filmmaker myself, I do believe there should have been a counter-opinion to Peter Sprigg's statement, as well as another grown-up that could say GOOD things about having been raised by gay parents. Instead they showed a woman whose parents clearly went over the line of parents by talking about sex at the table; it doesn't matter if they were gay men or not. We all know there are tons of poorly raised kids by heterosexual marriages. Still, I think that Spurlock, who I am a fan of, did the best he could. He may have very well wanted Kati to "open her eyes" a little more, that usually is the point of the show. It happened in the other season when a homophobic guy from Michigan spent 30 days with a gay guy in the Castro. Of course, I had concerns about that one as well. Why Castro? How about have him spend 30 days with someone in his own town 3 or 4 doors down? He probably has best friends who are gay and he doesn't even know it.


  • Name: Victor
    Date posted: 2008-06-26 3:44 PM
    Hometown: Virginia

    Comment:

    I watched the episode last night, and being a documentary filmmaker myself, I do believe there should have been a counter-opinion to Peter Sprigg's statement, as well as another grown-up that could say GOOD things about having been raised by gay parents. Instead they showed a woman whose parents clearly went over the line of parents by talking about sex at the table; it doesn't matter if they were gay men or not. We all know there are tons of poorly raised kids by heterosexual marriages. Still, I think that Spurlock, who I am a fan of, did the best he could. He may have very well wanted Kati to "open her eyes" a little more, that usually is the point of the show. It happened in the other season when a homophobic guy from Michigan spent 30 days with a gay guy in the Castro. Of course, I had concerns about that one as well. Why Castro? How about have him spend 30 days with someone in his own town 3 or 4 doors down? He probably has best friends who are gay and he doesn't even know it.


  • Name: Jay
    Date posted: 2008-06-26 12:30 PM
    Hometown: Burbank

    Comment:

    Sean - my reference was not to suggest that presenting both sides on the program would be so, but that forcing the network to alter content to suit our viewpoint would be. Hope that clarifies. I honestly though the show did a good job at showing the various viewpoints. This was about experience as opposed to scientifically controlled research, and thus anecdotal evidence was perfectly appropriate for both sides, in my opinion.


  • Name: Mario
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 9:08 PM
    Hometown: Chapel Hill, NC

    Comment:

    Also I found it interesting - and touching in a twisted way - that the most hostile pro-gay people Kati met were the straight (and formerly somewhat homophobic) family of one of the adopted children. And she couldn't understand why her working, essentially, to put those children back into foster care, might anger these parents. Why can't we be friends, even tho I'm working to break up your families?! Typical Christian entitlement - we need to respect *their* beliefs while they not only don't respect ours, but they want to actively oppress us and interfere in our personal lives.


  • Name: Mario
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 9:06 PM
    Hometown: Chapel Hill, NC

    Comment:

    While I thought it would have been better to counter that claim directly, I thought the show did a good job of showing that claim to be without a very strong foundation by showing numerous happy gay families (parents and children), and straight advocates who argued that gay parents can be great parents and that loving families are definitely better than foster care. I also thought that the episode could have used someone mentioning the fact that homophobic people wanting to deny gay couples children because of the negative impact of homophobia is just circular. She teared up because their children had to decide whether to tell their friends about their two dads – but she didn’t realize that it was people like her who created that situation. Without homophobia there would be no need to “come out”. And the claims about negative things associated with homosexuality? The element of truth is that some of those things *are* associated with being gay - in a homophobic society.


  • Name: Bobby
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 8:42 PM
    Hometown: Jacksonville, FL

    Comment:

    Come on people, lighten up. I bet there are Christians out there who are all up in arms about how 30 Days made Kati look like a victim for her "suffering" and "mental torture" at the hands of her gay hosts. I felt that FX showed a pretty balanced view of gay adoption and a person who is opposed to it. There is probably nothing that the network could have said or shown that would please everyone. Has any other major network done this type of story and "got it all fair and balanced"? I understand we are a persecuted group, but doesn't it make your shoulders sore if you NEVER let that chip rest on the ground, even for a few minutes of relief?


  • Name: Sean S.
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 6:44 PM
    Hometown: Columbia, SC

    Comment:

    There is nothing "gestapo" like about countering inaccurate and factually untrue medical information. I would lose my clinical social work license if I were to suggest or make a statement to a patient that was not supported by medical or scientific evidence. Theres no reason why other people, whom have NO medical background or training at all, should not have similar restrictions and regulations. Why is it that someone who puts Rev. in front of their names allowed to make medical diagnoses and recommendations that someone else would lost their board certification for?


  • Name: Jay
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 3:33 PM
    Hometown: Burbank

    Comment:

    Mr. Sullivan - you're more than welcome to your opinion as am I. I'll keep it civil and polite. I saw the show and the quote in question was hardly indicative of the tone of the week's experiment. Somebody from the Family Research Council said something insulting and ill-researched about gay people. Are we surprised? Of course it's crap and it's untrue. Still, it is not the responsibility of FX to give an opposing, GLAAD-approved counterpoint soundbite. We can't gestapo our way to equality and acceptance.


  • Name: Chris Sullivan
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 2:26 PM
    Hometown: Chicago, IL

    Comment:

    You don't see the smoke here? Honey, take off your rose-colored Elton John glasses!


  • Name: Jay
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 1:01 PM
    Hometown: Burbank

    Comment:

    Maybe Morgan Spurlock (who is definitely NOT anti-gay and curiously not mentioned in GLAAD's press release) felt that the premise of the show: that is, people walking another's shoes for 30 days was a strong enough statement that at least there's two sides to every story. I'm not seeing the smoke here.


  • Name: Chris Sullivan
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 12:19 PM
    Hometown: Chicago, IL

    Comment:

    It's time to boycott! MOney speaks volumes in showbiz!


  • Name: Chris Sullivan
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 12:17 PM
    Hometown: Chicago, IL

    Comment:

    If the FX channel knew of the comments being made and didn't at least provide a platform for a counter-balancing point of view - tehy deserve every bit of criticism that comes there way. I've stopped watching FX until the GLBT community receives an apology.


  • Name: Ang
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 10:29 AM
    Hometown: Atlanta

    Comment:

    Mike, "gay-friendly, democratic president" ? Who would that be? Obama, who barnstormed SC with Donnie McClurkin? The man who is on record as saying marriage is between a man and a woman? Not even a hint of equivocation in that statement. He may be better for us than McCain, but lets not kid ourselves into thinking we have a "friend".


  • Name: Dave J
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 10:25 AM
    Hometown: New York City

    Comment:

    Isn't Scott Seomin a former GLAAD Director?


  • Name: christy
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 9:15 AM
    Hometown: gainesville, fl

    Comment:

    I didn't get a "friendly" vibe from Nip/Tuck.


  • Name: ALR
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 8:26 AM
    Hometown: Midwest

    Comment:

    I watched the episode and was stunned to here that what seemed to me to be homosexuals placed in the same box as child abusers! But I think the only mistake was FX didn't supply another point of view. I don't believe FX to be anti-gay, as there have been other gay affirming shows, scenes, and the like appearing on their air (i.e. Nip/Tuck). I actually thought that, thought they had difference of opinions, it was done respectfully. I wish more gay people were as calm as what Thomas and Dennis were (at least the portions that we saw). As well as, I wish that presumably Christian community would be a little more open to investigate and learn (or try in this case) such as Kati. It wasn't the perfect show...but I thought it got its point across.


  • Name: Mike Scott
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 1:33 AM
    Hometown: Richardson, TX

    Comment:

    Yes, FX is very anti-gay. I'm sure the veeps jumped on this opportunity to give their "religous nut" cohorts a platform by which to spew their hate and lies. I'm sure it was politically motivated with the very real threat of a gay-friendly, democratic president preventing them from controlling how people live and forcing people to share their misery. It won't work though. People know they are a bunch of nuts, and won't even listen to what they have to say, so they are just "pissing in the wind"!


  • Name: Rich Sutton
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 12:53 AM
    Hometown: Saint Louis

    Comment:

    My partner and I are parents. We have spent the last 8 years telling our son that God created our family, because he did. And it is a beautiful family, loving, compasionate, involved in our community, educated, tax paying, etc. We are extremely offended by these comments but not supprised considering the source. We think the lack of action by FX is as offensive as the comments made by Sprigg. Homophobia is real, and is only perpetuated by this type of language. We pray to the same God as the Family Research Council. He teaches our family to love each other and that it is not our place to judge. How do they sleep at night? Please pray for them, we are.


  • Name: Danyelle
    Date posted: 2008-06-25 12:51 AM
    Hometown: Allendale, MI

    Comment:

    I couldn't believe when I watched that episode tonight and they quoted The Family Research Council without any backup or anything from the other side. Great- anyone who watched that show thinks all gay parents abuse their kids, make them sexually promiscuous, and some how give them a mental illnesses. Thanks 30 Days, for making it even harder to be gay in America!


  • Name: Rick
    Date posted: 2008-06-24 10:37 PM
    Hometown: Charlotte, NC

    Comment:

    It is important that LGBT people respond to this act by the FX Network. Comments such as these cannot go unchallenged. FX needs to hear from all of us.


  • Name: pete
    Date posted: 2008-06-24 10:23 PM
    Hometown: palm springs

    Comment:

    fx is anti-gay anyway, isn't it?


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • U.S. Politics From a Distance
    As America continues to rejoice in election of Barack Obama -- while gay Californians lament the passing of Prop. 8 -- overseas, political activists look on from a distance. Zachery Scott has watched the drama following Election Day unfold as he serves in the Peace Corps in Mozambique.
  • Shoshana Bean Is Lookin' for a Superhero
    Not many girls can wow a Broadway crowd in shows like Wicked and Hairspray, then turn around and bring the audience to its feet at the Soul Train Lady of Soul Awards. But Shoshana Bean goes far beyond what most people might expect, as evidenced by her soulful debut album, Superhero.
  • 30 Years Later, We Can Still Learn from Milk
    COMMENTARY: Thirty years after the death of Harvey Milk, Americans can still learn from his inspiring and profound work as an activist, politician and friend. With the story of his life opening in theatres this week, Lane Hudson takes a look back at how Milk's legacy lives on -- and what we can to do pay tribute to the legend.
  • Urban Cowboy
    How does a brand that is over a century old make itself cool again? With a little help from the gays. Levi Strauss & Co. sponsored the world premiere of Milk at the Castro Theatre in San Francisco in October, and The Advocate sat down with the out president of the denim company, Robert Hanson, that afternoon to find out what Levi's and Harvey Milk have in common.
  • L.A. Gay Center Responds to Prop. 8 Criticism
    In the December 16 edition of The Advocate, writer Ben Ehrenreich analyzed the differing opinions of why Prop. 8 passed at the polls in his article, "Anatomy of a Failed Campaign." Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center chief public affairs officer Jim Key responds to the criticisms raised by that article.
  • Billy Baldwin Pleads for Return of Dirty Sexy Money
    Actor William Baldwin is half of one of TV’s most groundbreaking couples -- his Dirty Sexy Money character is in love with a transsexual, played by Candis Cayne -- but it’s one plot that may not get to play itself out, as the show is in danger of cancellation. Baldwin sat down with Advocate.com to talk about rumors that ABC is "de-gaying" its lineup, what the future holds for Money, and whether network heads ever interfered with his controversial story line.
  • The Kid Stays in the Picture
    Lana Turner's lesbian daughter, Cheryl Crane, has penned her second memoir about her late, great movie star mother -- Lana: The Memories, the Myths, the Movies. Crane sits down with The Advocate to relive that fateful night she killed her mother's mobster lover, share some untold stories, and give us a sneak peek at the new photographs of their life together.
  • The Soul of Seal
    Armed with a new album of soul classics and his trademark blunt outlook on the state of the world, Seal sat down with Advocate.com to discuss the rumors that he and wife Heidi Klum would have left the country had John McCain been elected, the gay rights movement, and what makes Seal's sound so damn sexy.
  • Finding the Silver Lining in Defeat
    Three weeks ago, like many LGBT Americans, I woke up with, to say the least, mixed feelings. The euphoria of Barack Obama’s election and the expansion of the pro-LGBT majority in Congress was tempered by sadness and anger at our devastating losses in Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, and, of course, California. The silver lining of these defeats has been a renewed focus nationwide on the issue of marriage equality.
  • Separation of Sundance and State
    In 2009, Sundance will celebrate 25 years of bringing together international cinema and a variety of cultures in Park City, Utah. But with California's gay community reeling from the passage of Prop. 8, activists and filmmakers are suggesting a boycott of the festival and theater chain Cinemark, whose CEO donated a substantial sum to the marriage ban's campaign. But just how realistic is a boycott of an entire state?
  • Democratic Supermajority No Guarantee for Gay Progress
    The 2008 election may already be one for the record books, but triumphant Democrats are still vying for an elusive political prize -- the 60-seat supermajority required to overcome Republican filibuster attempts and advance their legislative agenda swiftly beginning in January. But what are the odds of actually getting 60 seats -- and will it really push gay rights to the front of the line?
  • From the Great White Way to the White House
    While there won’t be a woman in the White House anytime in the near future, 24 took the reins and elected to cast two-time Tony Award winner Cherry Jones as its first female president, Allison Taylor, who is likely to have everything including terrorists, WMDs, and the kitchen sink thrown at her. Jones sat down with The Advocateto talk marriage, the White House, and her "fluid" relationship with partner Sarah Paulson.
  • Handicapping the LGBT Priorities of President-elect Obama
    As the Obama-Biden transition ensues, insights are surfacing into the new administration's agenda for gay Americans. While many of the policy pronouncements read like a list of old favorites, some lesser-known initiatives will likely gain momentum early on.
  • A Fortune 500 Take on Prop. 8
    The old saying goes that every cloud has a silver lining. And on November 5, the day after California voters stripped same-sex couples of the right to marry, so many around the country were searching for one. Although thousands of individuals, organizations, and businesses donated to the Yes on 8 campaign, not one Fortune 500 company is among those names. But on the opposite side, the side of fairness and basic rights, you’ll find some of the nation’s most successful and powerful corporate players.
  • Chevy Volt: The Jolt GM Needs?
    Launching a new vehicle while the American auto industry is asking Congress for a $25 billion bailout might seem like illogical timing, but for General Motors and the people behind Chevy Volt, it’s essential. With their backs against the wall, GM is rolling out their much-anticipated first plug-in electric vehicle -- and focusing their marketing efforts on the gay community.
  • Dr. Phil Weighs in on Prop. 8
    Advocate.com gets an early peek at a very heated episode of Dr. Phil. Gavin Newsom, HRC's Joe Solmonese, and L.A. attorney Gloria Allred face off against Prop. 8 supporters to talk same-sex marriage. In what may well be a first, Dr. Phil told the audience he would be keeping his opinions to himself.
  • An Unpopular Opinion: Blacks, Gays, and Prop. 8
    The injection of race into the analysis of Proposition 8's passage is extremely disappointing. A battle for equal rights has now turned into an issue of whites versus blacks. But while some black gays think marriage shouldn't be a priority and that outreach to African-Americans should have been stronger, journalist Clay Cane says he has a vested interest in inequalities related to both race and sexual orientation ... and he doesn't need someone to hold his hand to believe that marriage equality is important.
  • Politics and Progress With Patti LaBelle
    The last time girl-group Labelle dropped an album, the thought of a black president or same-sex marriage seemed as “far-out” as the band’s disco-spacewoman suits and fusion of disco, rock, and soul. But the button-pushing, soul-singing trio has reunited, and on the heels of Prop. 8 passing and Barack Obama being elected president, Patti LaBelle talks to The Advocate about the mix of emotions she's dealt with over the past few weeks.
  • Seth Meyers's Big Gay Saturday Night
    SNL funnyman Seth Meyers talks to Advocate.com about last week's episode of Saturday Night Live -- the gayest episode in the history of the show, by some accounts. With touches including Justin Timberlake as Beyoncé's backup dancer and Snagglepuss crashing Weekend Update, it caused some bloggers to take offense ... but Meyers says it's just the sort of stuff that stemmed from many discussions about Prop. 8.
  • All Hands, Black and White, On Deck
    The high number of African-Americans who voted to pass Proposition 8 may have surprised some people, but not the folks at the National Black Justice Coalition, a civil rights organization dedicated to empowering black LGBT Americans. NBJC's CEO offers some insights about the black-white divide and how to mend it going forward.