Continental promo
||  News  ||
 
October 23, 2008

Ron Burkle Wrangles Hollywood to Raise $3.9 Million for No on 8

Ron Burkle Wrangles Hollywood to Raise $3.9 Million for No on 8

Big names and deep pockets were out Tuesday night at Ron Burkle’s Green Acres Estate in Beverly Hills. The straight billionaire and former owner of the Ralphs supermarket chain opened his home to a gala fund-raiser for No on Proposition 8, the ballot measure that would amend California's constitution to rescind same-sex marriage rights. With Melissa Etheridge and Mary J. Blige headlining and a host committee including producer Bruce Cohen (Milk), San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom, and Kate Capshaw and Steven Spielberg, the event, with tickets starting at $500, was sold out.

The big donors had a private dinner for 75 people at 6:30 with Barbra Streisand in attendance. Guests then streamed into the back of Burkle’s estate, where ticket holders sipped Kendall Jackson wine and beer and sampled a buffet of sweets.

In attendance were a who’s who of the entertainment industry. Celebrity publicist to Ellen DeGeneres Kelly Bush attended with her wife, Linda, along with director Adam Shankman (Hairspray); Alan Poul (creator of Swingtown); Dan Jinks and his partner, Matt Whitney; Regent CEO Paul Colichman and his partner, David; and celebrity manager Jason Weinberg even brought Jared Leto as his guest.

Midway through the evening, Gavin Newsom took the stage to speak. Looking and speaking like the presidential candidate he could one day become, he rallied the crowd before introducing Melissa Etheridge.

MELISSA ETHERIDGE X390 (BECKY SAPP--RESTRICTED) | ADVOCATE.COM
Melissa Etheridge: “Am I ever gonna see my wedding day?”

She spoke like Dylan, if he had a down-home drawl, about a time in the future when her grandchildren would hear stories of when she was not allowed to marry. She opened with “Wedding Bell Blues” by the Fifth Dimension but changed “Bill” to “Jill” in the lyric "Marry me, Bill." The audience screamed when she sang out, “Am I ever gonna see my wedding day?”

She spoke at length between songs, saying marriage is inevitable, because before her performance she had put her kids to bed, after going to the doctor that afternoon to have one of them treated for an ear infection. She told the crowd, “Marriage is in our hearts.”

She talked about how absurd it was that the Mormon Church, from another state, had given millions of dollars to support Prop. 8. She said that was a desperate act that must “really mean that their walls are crumbling.” But she said that doesn’t mean LGBT people and their allies do not need to raise money to fight this initiative. She announced that for $50,000 she would sing any song anyone wanted, even coming to someone’s home. But she got no takers.

Just as she left the stage, Bruce Cohen rushed up to say that he had spoken to one couple who would give $50,000 if she would agree to sing at their wedding in December, to which she graciously agreed.

Next up, Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center CEO and No on Prop. 8 strategist Lorri Jean took the stage to talk about the fight's progress. She said opponents of the measure had felt good about everything until two weeks ago when polls put their side several points and at least $15 million behind Yes on 8. In the two weeks since, however, No on 8 has raised $10 million, she said, and the night represented the big push to try to bridge the gap and catch up financially.

At the start of the evening, she said, No on 8 had already raised $3.7 million, and since Burkle had agreed to finance every dollar of the event's cost, all the  money raised would be going to the cause.

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa x390 (Becky Sapp--restricted) | Advocate.com
Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa

Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa took to the stage and announced the next and last performer of the evening, Mary J. Blige. He said the event was almost sold out the previous Tuesday, but when organizers announced that day that Blige would be joining the bill, the last of the tickets went right away.

A full band and three backup singers began to play until she appeared, sleek in a tailored dress, big dangling diamond earrings, and six-inch stiletto heels and carrying a bejeweled microphone. She started her set with “Real Love,” saying, "Isn’t that what everyone is really looking for?" Next she played “No More Drama,” and when she screamed out the lyrics “I choose to win” the crowd was on its feet and dancing. She was practically in tears as she belted over and over again, “No more, no more, no more drama.”

Next up: a rendition of U2's “One.” Audience members waved their hands back and forth, and couples embraced as she sang lines like, “You act like you never had love, and you want me to go without." Blige closed with her recent hit single “Be Without You,” which, though about a relationship, was a fitting end and felt like a rallying cry to not let this proposition split couples apart.

The emotion stirred by Blige, Etheridge, Newsom, and others was palpable, and as Jean took to the stage one last time to beg for more money, several $25,000 donors raised their hands, including actor David Hyde Pierce.

After a wave of additional contributions, attendees were bid good night and sent back to the chauffeured vans that had brought them up to the estate.

All in all, the event raised $3.9 million to fight the proposition. (Corey Scholibo, The Advocate)

Related stories from Advocate.com

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: Granny
    Date posted: 2008-10-27 5:23 PM
    Hometown: Menifee, CA

    Comment:

    If the religious right wins on Proposition 8 how about if all of us gays gather enough support to change the tax exempt status for all churches and religious institutions. That means the Mormons and the Roman Catholic Church and all other churches who really did a job pushing YES on Prop 8. They posted signs, preached how to vote from the pulpits, had phone banks and contributed millions and millions to defeat this proposition. Church wants to be part of State so let's tax them and then they can pay for being part of politics.


  • Name: Sam
    Date posted: 2008-10-23 3:52 PM
    Hometown: Santa Ana

    Comment:

    Daniel, those hateful ads on THE WAVE that you speak of are for YES ON 8! We're certainly not going to win the battle if we cannot clearly state which side is ours and which is theirs! Take note all Californian's who will vote on November 4th....Prop 8 will amend the constitution to deny the LBGT community the right to marry. Please, you want to vote No - NOT YES!


  • Name: Daniel David
    Date posted: 2008-10-23 10:55 AM
    Hometown: Los Angeles

    Comment:

    THE WAVE (94.7 FM), in Los Angeles, is now running ads opposing Proposition 8. They are running those hateful ads this morning. I'm shocked. Can it get any worse?!?! And here...Dave Koz...is working at 94.7.


  • Name: James
    Date posted: 2008-10-23 1:14 AM
    Hometown: Los Angeles

    Comment:

    N. Gozzano is right - all the No on 8 ads have been low-key, quiet affairs. The average household/car environment is noisy, with lots of competition. The volume of any message has to cut over all that to be heard. In addition, there are all the other props. competing for attention. We need loud voiceovers that are confrontational, that will grab attention. And the wicked lies of the "good" Christians need to be confronted head-on. The most recent radio ad is good, but the voiceover is tired & low volume. When the undecided vote was around 9% or so, it made sense to gear commercials for that group. Now it's down to about 6%, and we need to also go after those 'yes' votes that are not firm, and could be persuaded to change. If TV time is too expensive, concentrate on radio & saturate like crazy.


  • Name: n gozzano
    Date posted: 2008-10-23 12:43 AM
    Hometown: los angeles

    Comment:

    I've seen the No On 8 spin to supporters that their research shows their ads work; They're talking about focus groups in a closed environment hearing only their message. That tells you nothing about how they compete in the open market. Yes on 8 turned the numbers around dramatically based on simple distortions and smears played over and over again mostly on radio. And if No On 8 doesn't use that same tried and true strategy of simple smears and attacks, to sour middle of the road voters on prop 8 and it's supporters we will lose. Get your heads out of the clouds folks, forget about signs and gotv and websites; simple ugly attack ads mostly on radio is the only way to turn those voters against 8 in the same way they were pushed towards it. The rest is playing around the edges.


  • Name: John
    Date posted: 2008-10-22 10:09 PM
    Hometown: Miami

    Comment:

    I think the ads target undecided voters. It's a strategic move. They're the ones who decide the outcome of this, because the majority of voters made up their minds long before the airwaves battle started. The campaign says that research proves these ads work with undecided voters.


  • Name: Dan Poirier
    Date posted: 2008-10-22 9:52 PM
    Hometown: Altadena, CA

    Comment:

    I think that "lethargy" is too strong - if you volunteer, you will find that the campaign is working hard to defeat Prop 8. They are methodical about crafting messages that work. I won't vouch for the ads effectiveness, but I believe it's not for lack of trying. A campaign is won just by its leadership. It seems every talented right-wing web designer has designed beautiful misinformation sites for the other side. People are digging deep to contribute, and they are getting their churches mobilized. We do the same, but in CA and nationwide, I think LGBTs were a bit complacent. Two weeks ago, recruiting volunteers, it was hard to involve some LGBTs. I was hearing, "We're winning anyway, right?". Now, there's panic. It's not too late, if we do everything we can to win. Advise and encourage our leadership, volunteer, donate, and get out the vote.


  • Name: n gozzano
    Date posted: 2008-10-22 9:17 PM
    Hometown: los angels

    Comment:

    John Smith, I think the problem with what you propose is that nobody has the kind of resources that EcQA has and there's no time to start from scratch. I wasn't familiar with Californians Against Hate. They're great! Their dishonor roll is a gold mine of potential for going on the attack. e.g. Concerned Women for America (Beverly Lahey) alone has a long whaked out history on video that could so be used to taint prop 8. I can't for the life of me understand why No On 8 is on defense when there's such rich potential for tying 8 to everything extreme and ugly that most Californians hate. It's so maddeningly easy but for some bizarre reason they think they need to take the high road. I guess we can feel superior when we lose.


  • Name: John Smith
    Date posted: 2008-10-22 8:41 PM
    Hometown: California -- EqCA can become irrelevant on its own

    Comment:

    I don't think it's necessary for us to change EqCA... there are other organizations... we should just move our support to them or perhaps build new ones around those who run the best websites that are doing what n gozzano suggests... the most prominent one is Californians Against Hate.


  • Name: James
    Date posted: 2008-10-22 7:22 PM
    Hometown: San Francisco

    Comment:

    n gozzano... I agree, absolutely, 1000%. I am sickened by the pathetic no on 8 campaign. Our ads are weak and ininspired. The campaign could have easilly gotten pro bono advertising and public relations. Where are these stars giving money? Why can't they be featured in on-air ads? Why can't gay families be featured on the ads? That we may lose this right is apalling.


  • Name: LeoOnTheEdge
    Date posted: 2008-10-22 6:58 PM
    Hometown: Edgewater, New Jersey

    Comment:

    Bravo to all of those who took part in the "No On 8" fundraiser. We all stand with you in defeating this monstrous effort on the part of the Mormons and the Republican Party. My question is that (heaven forbid) if this passes, will it nullify all the marriages that have taken place up to this point or will they be allowed to legally survive?


  • Name: Jack Dimos
    Date posted: 2008-10-22 6:16 PM
    Hometown: Los Angeles

    Comment:

    PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE! NO ON PROP 8 FOLKS: it's time now to spend money to defeat Prop 8-take the gloves off! We need some hard-hitting ads that will saturate the airwaves-and make the liars on the other side ashamed of themselves. LA Times, and other newspapers are doing their best to get the word out, but where are our ads?


  • Name: Bill
    Date posted: 2008-10-22 5:44 PM
    Hometown: Malibu

    Comment:

    I'm in agreement with N. Gozzano- I think our ads need to take on the lies the other side is promoting. It's not like we don't have ammunition- yesterday's gathering of education officials debunking the nonsense about teaching the gay lifestyle in the classroom, would make a nice ad. But more than that, I'm just not seeing many ads on tv or hearing any on radio. It's time -NOW- to put that money to work !


  • Name: Mark
    Date posted: 2008-10-22 5:13 PM
    Hometown: Seattle

    Comment:

    One big "Thank You" to everyone involved and all those that contributed to the event above. Together with your big contributions and all us who have given amounts like $50.00, we are doing more of what we can do. I will probably send more. We have a 'death with diginity' initiative in Washington that's being opposed by out-of-state church leaders (like Prop 8). The supporters of death with diginity mention in their ads that the opposition is mainly being financed by out-of-state church leaders. Would it be worth mentioning that about Prop 8 in the No on 8's ads since 77% is coming from the non-mainstream Mormon church? The Mormon church's values are very different from mainstream voters (which is largely where this election will be decided).


  • Name: Hank
    Date posted: 2008-10-22 5:05 PM
    Hometown: Greenville, Mississippi

    Comment:

    What I'm really surprised at is the lethargy that seems to be in the No on 8 camp. Gay people in California are literally about to be reduced to second class citizen ship and the commercials combating the measures are bloody soft balling the approach. FIGHT DAMMIT! If they don't fight and they lose then they damn well deserve it! Complacent cowardice should not be rewarded.


  • Name: n gozzano
    Date posted: 2008-10-22 3:46 PM
    Hometown: los angels

    Comment:

    Has the entire gay community become unconscious sheep being led to the slaughter by Kors, Smith, and company?! I can't believe there's no outrage that we're losing the historic right to marry due to utter incompetence from ECQA "leaders". Money's not the real problem here folks. We have no persuasive message! We're being throttled on TV and radio by the most standard attack ads and the best they can do is respond with milk toast "no fair" complaints? Prop 8 has got to be glued to it's scary far right backers, who, by the way, can also be used to alienate the black community from the measure. If we don't get down and dirty we lose. period. Is there any easier messenger to attack-The Mormon Church and other out of state extremists pouring in tens of millions to rewrite Ca's constitution to reflect their extreme views. It's politics 101! If you want 8 to lose demand a shake up at ECQA.


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • View From the Hill: The End of DADT?
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed that lawyers are exploring ways to ease enforcement of the military's gay ban, but cautioned that the law doesn't leave much wiggle room. He need look no further than DOD history for a lesson in altering the policy.
  • Hot Sheet: Week of July 5
    When you get back from that big 4th of July barbecue, unwind with Sacha Baron Cohen's Bruno and your favorite B-movie-mocking, basic cable robots.
  • Hungry Like the Wolf
    A master of viola, ukulele, piano, and harp, Patrick Wolf is a music prodigy -- one who, the night before this interview, spit on a cop and got himself arrested.
  • Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
    Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.
  • The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
    With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.
  • Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
    After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.
  • The Pride of Antwerp
    Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.
  • Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
    In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.
  • Top Political Blogs
    From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.
  • The Diva of French Television
    A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.