CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
Democratic senators said Thursday that they oppose a constitutional amendment to preserve the definition of marriage as a man-woman union, saying that the Defense of Marriage Act, the federal law defining marriage as such, is not at risk. They were responding to witnesses at a Judiciary Subcommittee hearing who are pushing for an amendment because they believe that DOMA may soon be challenged in court. "No courts have questioned that law.... I don't think anyone has seriously suggested that law is in danger," said Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.). DOMA was passed in 1996. It denies federal recognition of same-sex marriages and allows states to ignore same-sex marriages allowed elsewhere. Some politicians, including President Bush, have been concerned that U.S. courts might overturn the federal law. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) said he organized the hearing to determine whether more laws would be needed to strengthen DOMA. He insisted that the hearing was not set up to consider a constitutional amendment. But Democrats said that such an amendment is the ultimate goal of some Republicans. Though no amendment has been proposed in the Senate, such a measure has been introduced in the House. Amendment supporters said at the hearing that a constitutional change is needed to protect children and to help stem the disintegration of the family. Maggie Gallagher, president of the Institute for Marriage and Public Policy, testified that marriage is a key social institution for the protection of children. Other witnesses said it is only a matter of time before the traditional marriage definition is challenged, particularly as states pass laws recognizing gay marriages. The Supreme Court recently struck down a Texas law that made gay sex a crime, overturning an earlier ruling that said states could punish gay men and lesbians for having sex. Among the opponents of an amendment was Keith Bradkowski, the partner of Jeff Collman, an American Airlines pilot who was on the first of the four planes hijacked by terrorists in the September 11 attack. Bradkowski said he had a committed relationship with Collman though they were never legally able to marry. He described the difficulties he encountered in proving his relationship with Collman after his death, such as when he tried to obtain a death certificate. He said the definition of marriage should be left to the states. "Jeff and I only sought to love and take care of each other," he told the committee. "I do not understand why that is a threat to some people."
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
31 Period Films of Lesbians and Bi Women in Love That Will Take You Back
December 09 2024 1:00 PM
18 of the most batsh*t things N.C. Republican governor candidate Mark Robinson has said
October 30 2024 11:06 AM
True
After 20 years, and after tonight, Obama will no longer be the Democrats' top star
August 20 2024 12:28 PM
Trump ally Laura Loomer goes after Lindsey Graham: ‘We all know you’re gay’
September 13 2024 2:28 PM
Melania Trump cashed six-figure check to speak to gay Republicans at Mar-a-Lago
August 16 2024 5:57 PM
These 13 major companies caved to the far right and stopped DEI programs
January 24 2025 1:11 PM
True
Latest Stories
West Point military academy eliminates cadet clubs amid Trump’s diversity crackdown
February 05 2025 2:42 PM
15 Democratic state AGs stand by gender-affirming care
February 05 2025 2:39 PM
American satisfaction with state of LGBTQ+ rights reaches lowest point in over a decade
February 05 2025 2:05 PM
LGBTQ+ non-U.S. citizens at risk under Trump’s immigration crackdown: study
February 05 2025 12:56 PM
Lesbian cop wins $750k in sexual harassment lawsuit against former chief
February 05 2025 11:53 AM
If Trump can rename the Gulf, why can't we rename ourselves?
February 05 2025 7:00 AM
What can trans people do about Trump’s executive orders? Be plaintiffs, says Lambda Legal
February 05 2025 6:00 AM
Lawsuit challenges Trump's executive order targeting gender-affirming care
February 04 2025 7:58 PM
Fearless + Fighting Back: Lambda Legal’s plan to protect LGBTQ+ and HIV rights
February 04 2025 6:04 PM
e.l.f. Beauty CEO defends DEI: 'Our diversity is a key competitive advantage'
February 04 2025 5:19 PM
Trump moves to abolish Education Department amid push against 'wokeness'
February 04 2025 2:50 PM