By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
While the justices upheld the coverage requirement for insurance companies to pay for preventive care at no cost to the patient, they also gave the HHS secretary more power.
The justices are expected to issue rulings on the most controversial cases of the term imminently.
LGBTQ+ and public health advocates warn that a ruling in favor of the plaintiffs would allow insurers to begin denying or charging for services currently guaranteed to be free—like STI testing, diabetes screening, contraception, and maternal care.
Here's what’s at stake in the latest Obamacare challenge that the original plaintiffs claimed encouraged people to be gay.
Just how far does religious freedom go? Many human rights experts believe it's already gone too far.
