
Just when you thought every facet of John Lennon’s life had been mined in the 25 years since his murder, a new gay twist has come to light. A report in the Liverpool Daily Post & Echo details how Beatles manager Brian Epstein was outed to Lennon by a friend and how Epstein threatened to take the friend to court over the “highly malicious and defamatory” remark.
It was 1962, the Beatles did not yet have a record contract, and gay sex was still illegal in the United Kingdom. So when John Lennon’s art-school acquaintance, Ian Sharp, outed the Beatles’ new manager, Brian Epstein, to Lennon and fellow Beatle Paul McCartney, Epstein’s lawyers sent Sharp a letter demanding a retraction. The acquaintance said he had heard of Epstein’s sexual orientation from a club owner he knew.
According to the Daily Post, Sharp asked Lennon and McCartney, “Which one of you does [Epstein] fancy?”
Sharp, who later changed his name to Richard Tate in order to pursue an acting career, told the newspaper, “I was just joking. There was nothing malicious, nor homophobic, about it. John and I were just 21, and that was the way we spoke.”
Tate added, “Thankfully, they didn’t use my other line. John had said, ‘He’s not like that, is he?’ and I replied, ‘Don’t bend down to pick up the contract.’”
Epstein was gay, but like Oscar Wilde before him, he could not allow a public disclosure of his sexuality to stand without putting his career and reputation at risk. So his attorneys drafted a letter to Sharp demanding a retraction. The letter, dated February 28, 1962, called Sharp’s remark “unwarranted innuendo” and said Epstein “takes the gravest possible exception” to it.
Tate told the Liverpool newspaper, “There was no debate about what I was to do—I had visions of courtrooms and paying out a huge amount of money, so we quickly put together a mealy-mouthed letter of apology.”
Speculation that Epstein fancied Lennon has been kicked about for decades. It inspired the acclaimed 1992 film The Hours and Times, in which gay writer-director Christopher Munch imagined what might have happened between the two late cultural icons during a 1962 vacation they shared in Barcelona. Ian Hart, who went on to play a Hogwarts teacher in the first Harry Potter movie, played John Lennon in the film.
Tate said he believes Epstein was being blackmailed over his sexuality at the time the letter was written by Epstein’s solicitors. Tate is discussing the incident now both because of the upcoming 25th anniversary of Lennon’s assassination, on December 8, and because he is performing in an upcoming BBC Radio 4 radio play about Lennon called Unimaginable, playing a reporter and an old friend of Lennon’s. (Advocate.com)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.