Connecticut law on sexual assault struck down for allowing gay sex

A state appellate court in Hartford, Conn., ruled Wednesday that a statute on sexual assault involving stepchildren is unconstitutional because it seems to endorse gay relationships. The court's decision, overturning the third-degree sexual assault conviction of a New Haven man, said the statute violated the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, dealing with equal protection.

The court ruled that the state law barring a stepparent from having sex with a stepchild of the opposite sex who is over 16 years old violates equal protection rights because the state statute language does not prohibit the same relationship with a stepchild of the same sex. "Under [the statute], sexual intercourse between a stepfather and stepdaughter is prohibited, but sexual intercourse between a stepfather and stepson is not," appellate court judge William J. Lavery wrote. "We can conceive of no rational basis for that distinction."

The appeals court had overturned the conviction of the man, referred to only as John M., ruling there was not enough evidence that his wife was the girl's biological mother, making him a stepfather. However, it went a step further in ruling that the sexual assault standard does not mention same-sex relationships and therefore is unequal.

Judge Barry R. Schaller agreed with the decision to overturn the conviction, but wrote in a separate opinion that his colleagues on the appellate court went too far in ruling the statute unconstitutional. "As a reviewing court, our obligation is clearly to avoid unnecessary constitutional adjudication." Schaller wrote, adding, "Our supreme court expressly has instructed that appellate courts should avoid deciding constitutional issues where possible." (AP)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

Error:Server capacity reached.

Error:Server capacity reached.