
Four Democratic presidential candidates are now confirmed to participate in the first-ever televised primary debate about LGBT issues, sponsored by the Human Rights Campaign and Logo. Senators Hillary Clinton, Christopher Dodd, and Barack Obama and former senator John Edwards will attend the event, to be held August 9 in Los Angeles. But one candidate, former senator Mike Gravel, was not invited to the debate because he didn't meet the fund-raising threshold for participants.
HRC spokesman Brad Luna said HRC and Logo initially set out to sponsor two different forums, one for Republican candidates and one for Democratic candidates.
“The precondition we set before those forums could be confirmed was that two out of the three leading candidates would have to confirm their attendance,” Luna said. On the Republican side, Mitt Romney declined the invitation, and Rudy Giuliani and Sen. John McCain never responded, so the GOP forum never got off the ground.
On the Democratic side, once the precondition was met with the top candidates, Luna said they set a standard for additional candidates requiring them to have raised a minimum of $100,000 in the first quarter of this year.
Of the eight
Democratic presidential candidates, only Gravel had not
reached that fund-raising bar. For the period ended March
31, Gravel had raised just under $35,000 from outside
sources and thus was not considered—although
his aides say he has now raised over $100,000 to date.
“For us, it was a matter of
viability—how much fund-raising support are you
receiving for your campaign,” said Luna.
But Gravel campaign officials were outraged by the omission. “We don’t recognize the legitimacy of this money criteria,” said David Eisenbach, a senior adviser to Gravel. “Mike has repeatedly said that money is the main source of corruption in American politics. For the HRC to kick Mike out of the debate based on money is a disservice to the gay and lesbian community.”
Eisenbach noted that Gravel has some of the most pro-gay stances of any presidential candidate: He’s in favor of same-sex marriage, supports repeal of the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy and wants to issue an apology to all gay service members who have been discharged under it, and he is the only candidate to have marched in a gay pride parade this year.
“This is censorship of the worst kind,” said Gravel, adding that he was originally to be omitted from the New Hampshire debates in June but ended up participating after CNN and other debate sponsors reversed course.
Rep. Dennis Kucinich, the other pro–marriage equality candidate, has not confirmed his attendance yet, and neither has New Mexico governor Bill Richardson. Sen. Joe Biden has declined the invitation based on scheduling conflicts. (Kerry Eleveld, The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.