A group that opposes the new sex education curriculum in Montgomery County, Md., has decided not to oppose a ruling in favor of the school system, The Washington Post reported Friday.
After a six-year debate, the school system adopted an updated sex education program last summer that described homosexuality as innate. Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum, a local nonprofit organization, objected to the teachings, arguing they violated a state law requiring that lessons be factual. The group also attacked mentions of anal intercourse, claiming they went against a law prohibiting teaching of “erotic techniques.”
Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum will now seek other ways to change the curriculum, group spokeswoman Michelle Turner told The Washington Post. The group, she said, is distributing literature to challenge the claim that homosexuality is inherent, and it will encourage the state legislature or state Board of Education to better define “erotic technique.”
“We think there are other avenues that would be more timely and have a greater impact,” Turner said. “We realize that we’re not going to get the outcome we’re looking for in a Montgomery County court, but we’re far from done.” (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.