CONTACTStaffCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2023 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
Don’t miss our latest news! Sign up today for our free newsletter.
Scroll To Top
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
Under pressure from activists, acting Massachusetts governor Jane Swift is seeking advice from the state's highest court about whether she is obligated to recall the legislature to vote on a constitutional amendment that would ban marriages between same-sex couples. Swift, who has one month left in office, announced her own position on Monday, more than four months after the legislature voted to adjourn the constitutional convention--a joint meeting of the house and senate--without taking action on the voter-initiated measure. "I am opposed to the amendment," Swift said. "But the bigger question is whether or not a governor has the obligation to recall the legislature under these circumstances." The Massachusetts Citizens for Marriage, which sponsored the proposed amendment, has applauded Swift's actions. A spokesman said the organization, which has fiercely campaigned for legislative action, had been actively lobbying Swift to step in. "In our humble opinion, the constitution is very clear," said coalition spokesman Brian Diver. "She is required to call them in until they did what their oath and constitutional responsibility is." In July the house and senate voted 137-53 to adjourn the constitutional convention without taking action on the amendment. Initiated by 130,000 citizens, the amendment would make same-sex marriages unconstitutional in Massachusetts and accord marriage benefits only to unions between one man and one woman. To appear on the ballot in November 2004, the voter-initiated question had to be approved by 25% of the 200 elected representatives and senators before this two-year legislative session ends and again during the 2003-2004 session. If the amendment had come to a vote, defeat would have required 151 votes in opposition. To kill the amendment by immediate adjournment, only 101 votes were needed--a simple majority. Sen. Harriette L. Chandler (D-Worcester), an opponent of the amendment, argues that the legislature did take action on the amendment by voting to adjourn. "I think that the legislature voted, and it's pretty clear what the vote was," Chandler said. "It wasn't even close." The state constitution states that if the house and senate "fail to agree upon a time for holding any joint session hereby required, or fail to continue the same from time to time until final action has been taken upon all amendments pending, the governor shall call such joint session or continuance thereof." Swift said there is some uncertainty in case law, however, about whether the governor is obliged to act if the action is likely to be futile.
Want more breaking equality news & trending entertainment stories?
Check out our NEW 24/7 streaming service: the Advocate Channel!
Download the Advocate Channel App for your mobile phone and your favorite streaming device!
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Lauren Boebert Caught Fondling Date’s Genitals During Family-Friendly Musical: Video
September 15 2023 11:20 PM
Don’t miss our latest news! Sign up today for our free newsletter.
Watch Now: Advocate Channel
Trending Stories & News
For more news and videos on advocatechannel.com, click here.
Trending Stories & News
For more news and videos on advocatechannel.com, click here.
Latest Stories
Transgender Youth Face Hurdles Getting Gender-Affirming Care Even When It's Legal
September 22 2023 2:30 PM
Victory for Students: LGBTQ+ Resource Center Reopens at Missouri University
September 22 2023 12:00 PM
Country Star Adam Mac Bows Out of Kentucky Festival After Homophobic Treatment
September 22 2023 10:38 AM
Pro-Equality Lawmakers Demand Removal of Anti-LGBTQ+ Sections From Defense Bill
September 21 2023 6:20 PM
Transgender American Suspended by Ukrainian Military After Controversial Video
September 21 2023 4:30 PM
‘Paw Patrol’ Spinoff Gets Nonbinary Character and the Right Freaks Out
September 21 2023 2:00 PM
Virginia Beach Students Push Back Against Glenn Youngkin's Anti-Trans Policies
September 21 2023 11:40 AM
Pete Buttigieg Explains the Difference Between Climate Change and Seasons to Republican Lawmaker
September 21 2023 11:30 AM
He Needs Gender-Affirming Surgery, but His State Is Fighting to Deny Coverage
September 21 2023 10:53 AM