CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
After deeming it a mistaken ruling, the government of Puerto Rico has filed a motion for a reconsideration of a Puerto Rico supreme court ruling to exclude same-sex couples from benefiting from Law 54, which pertains to domestic violence. In a 20-page document, the General Advocate's Office objected to the analysis made by the court regarding the law text and the application of the legal principle to cases as well as the constitutional implications of the judicial ruling. "The court use of legislative intention as a tool to interpret this case is mistaken," reads the legal motion, arguing that if the legislative intention was to exclude people from the law, it would have said so. In addition, it says that regardless of the social value ascribed to the law, there is an undisputable social reality of thousands of Puerto Ricans who form same-sex couples and as such form a consensual relationship under any reasonable definition. According to the government's interpretation of Law 54, it should include any victim of domestic violence regardless of the person's sex. "Law 54 is neutral," the motion reads. "In reality, the law has nothing to do with homosexuals, lesbians, or heterosexuals but with the physical and emotional pain suffered when they are subjected to abuse by people with whom they are having an intimate consensual relation." The government is warning the supreme court that should its ruling be sustained, it should make sure its opinion can survive challenges of a constitutional nature. "It could be argued that the ruling is based on a sex classification," reads the document.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
November 14 2025 4:08 PM
True
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
November 16 2025 9:15 AM
True
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Trans pastor says she’s ‘surrounded by loving kindness’ after coming out to New York congregation
December 04 2025 11:13 AM
Lesbian educator wins $700K after she was allegedly called a ‘witch’ in an ‘LGBTQ coven’
December 04 2025 10:59 AM
Years before Stonewall, a cafeteria riot became a breakthrough for trans rights
December 04 2025 10:50 AM
Charlie Kirk’s widow set to join out CBS News chief Bari Weiss for televised town hall
December 04 2025 10:20 AM
Women's Institute to ban transgender women after U.K. Supreme Court ruling
December 03 2025 4:10 PM
Grindr supports age verification bill introduced by two Republicans
December 03 2025 3:30 PM
Sarah Paulson & Holland Taylor's cutest moments on the Walk of Fame
December 03 2025 3:25 PM
Here's what Zohran Mamdani has promised to do for LGBTQ+ New Yorkers as mayor
December 03 2025 2:20 PM
Upstate New York Methodist minister comes out as transgender to congregation during Sunday service
December 03 2025 9:24 AM
Transgender Army vet running for state delegate in red Maryland district is all about showing up
December 03 2025 7:00 AM



































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes