CONTACTStaffCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2023 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
Scroll To Top
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
South Dakota legislators decided Wednesday that voters should get to decide if a ban on gay marriage should be added to the state constitution. A measure that would put the issue on the ballot easily cleared the house state affairs committee on a 10-2 vote, sending it to the house floor. Republican representative Elizabeth Kraus of Rapid City said that although state law already defines marriage as a union of one man and one woman, courts in other states have ruled differently. She said placing a gay marriage ban in the state constitution would protect traditional marriages in South Dakota. Kraus noted that South Dakota was the first state to pass a law that defined marriage, doing so in 1996. "South Dakota has led the nation in protecting marriage," Kraus said. "We need to amend our constitution to guard against activist judges." Opponents, however, said such an amendment would discriminate against gays and lesbians. They also worried that wording of the measure could interfere with contracts between gays that deal with such things as ownership of property and inheritance rights. "Discrimination does not belong in our state constitution," said Michael Oatman, a gay Mobridge businessman who has been partnered for 13 years.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Watch Now: Advocate Channel
Trending Stories & News
For more news and videos on advocatechannel.com, click here.
Trending Stories & News
For more news and videos on advocatechannel.com, click here.
Latest Stories
Elm Street Star Mark Patton Hospitalized With HIV Complications, Seeks Help
January 28 2023 11:43 AM
Jillian Michaels Shares Which Fitness Trends Are Bogus & Reflections on Biggest Loser
January 27 2023 4:54 PM