Joyce L. Kennard, an associate justice with the California supreme court, seems to be stuck on one point: wanting to know why the court should "willy-nilly overturn the will of the people."
March 06 2009 12:00 AM EST
November 17 2015 5:28 AM EST
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
Joyce L. Kennard, an associate justice with the California supreme court, seems to be stuck on one point: wanting to know why the court should "willy-nilly overturn the will of the people."
Joyce L. Kennard, an associate justice with the California supreme court, seems to be stuck on one point: wanting to know why the court should "willy-nilly overturn the will of the people."
Lawyers are countering that while democracy is set up so that American citizens can govern themselves, that doesn't give voters the right to strip equal rights away from a minority. And, as the judges have been reminded several times throughout the morning, they are the very judges who last year determined that denying same-sex couples the right to marry in California was unconstitutional.
The supreme court justice are grilling the anti-Prop. 8 lawyers on the issue of "unalienable rights" -- trying to pinpoint a definition of what "unalienable" means.
Watch oral arguments live at CalChannel.com .
Be sure to follow
Advocate on your favorite social platforms!
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
TikTok
Want more news, top stories, and videos? Check out the all NEW Advocate Channel!
Your 24/7 streaming source for equality news and lifestyle trends.
Click this link right now: https://advocatechannel.com