In the wake
of revelations that gay rights groups were spied on by
the federal government, Servicemembers Legal Defense Network
filed a lawsuit on Monday requesting details of the surveillance.
SLDN is suing the U.S. Department of Defense,
the Department of Justice, and their related agencies
to obtain the records. On January 5, SLDN requested
surveillance information in 20 days, citing the Freedom of
Information Act, and received no substantial information in
that time, said SLDN spokesman Steve Ralls. “We
requested expedited processing so these documents
don’t disappear,” Ralls told Advocate.com.
In written statements replying to the FOIA
requests, the National Security Agency (an arm of the
Department of Defense) told the SLDN no spying of gay
groups took place, and the Department of Justice responded
by saying it did not search its archives for surveillance
documents regarding gay groups but concluded they do
not exist.
According to the news reports, the Pentagon
spied on numerous LGBT organizations—including
New York University law school’s LGBT advocacy
group OUTlaw and gay groups at the State University of New
York at Albany and William Patterson College in New
Jersey—as well as People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals and Greenpeace.
“The federal government has attempted to
stonewall the public’s right to know, and SLDN
is aggressively challenging its decisions,” said C.
Dixon Osburn, SLDN’s executive director.
“The Bush administration consistently tells the
public that surveillance is conducted only on terrorists and
Americans communicating with terrorists; yet information
obtained by credible media sources indicates that it
is also spying on groups that support civil rights,
animal rights, and the environment. To suggest those
groups are terrorist is an act of modern-day McCarthyism.”
On Monday, U.S. attorney general Alberto
Gonzales went before Congress to defend President
Bush’s policy of eavesdropping on Americans without
obtaining warrants. (Advocate.com)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.