New York's highest court rejects marriage equality  | News | Advocate.com

Advocate.com health Channel
||  News  ||
 
July 07, 2006
New York's highest court rejects marriage equality
New York's highest court rejects marriage equality

After New York's highest court rejected marriage equality Thursday morning, advocates for same-sex marriage called upon the state legislature to pass a law granting the right to marry to gay and lesbian couples. Calling the court of appeals' 4-2 decision to uphold the state's ban on same-sex marriage "sad," attorneys, gay-rights activists, political leaders, and some of the 44 plaintiff couples in the four cases before the court said that marriage equality is now up to legislators in Albany, the state capital, to provide.

"The court made it clear that it is up to the state legislature to address the inequality in our marriage law," New York city council speaker Christine Quinn, who is gay, said in a statement. "It is time now for Albany to act, and to act quickly, to provide equal protection for all New Yorkers. I call on state lawmakers to put civil rights before politics. Together with other elected officials and the LGBT community, I will lobby the assembly, the senate, and the governor to ensure our laws treat all people equally."

Mayor Bloomberg, who appealed a lower-court ruling in favor of marriage equality but has since said he would work to change state law to allow same-sex marriage, also addressed the court of appeals' decision at a press conference today. "I will endorse a campaign to change the law," Bloomberg said. "But the court’s decision today just reaffirmed what the lawyers for both the state and the city have long believed was the existing law. The courts said it’s not unconstitutional to have a law that determines who can marry who. And so now what we have to do, if you believe that marriage should be between people if they want to do it, you go to the legislature. And I’ve said I would do that."

He added that he's "talked to some people in the gay community that want to get the laws changed, and we've started to work on a strategy, but it will eventually mean trying to convince the people in the legislature that they should change the law."

In its decision, the court of appeals ruled that gays and lesbians do not have the right to marry under current state law, and that to deny them civil marriage licenses is not a violation of their constitutional rights to due process and equal protection. "Whether such marriages should be recognized is a question to be addressed by the legislature," Judge Robert S. Smith wrote for the majority.

However, he stated that there are "at least two grounds that rationally support the limitation on marriage that the legislature has enacted" through current state law: that "it is more important to promote stability, and to avoid instability, in opposite-sex than in same-sex relationships," largely because of procreation, and that "it is better, other things being equal, for children to grow up with both a mother and a father."

Both grounds were dismissed by James Esseks, litigation director of the ACLU Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Project, at a midday press conference in Manhattan, in particular the judge's reasoning that legislators might think children do better with a mom and dad. "That may well be a cultural assumption that many of us, perhaps all of us, carry to some degree," said Esseks, who was one of several attorneys involved in the four different cases that were joined together as one omnibus case.

"But the high court in Arkansas came to precisely the opposite conclusion," he said, referring to a recent ruling by that state's supreme court that struck down a ban on gay foster parents. "It said that there is no shred of factual or scientific evidence to back up those claims. It's just not true that kids do better or worse with gay people or straight people. So what we have here is the highest court in the state of New York [making] a decision today that is decades behind Arkansas—and who would've thunk that?"

Susan Sommer, senior counsel at Lambda Legal, highlighted a line in the dissenting opinion written by Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye, who asserted that she is "confident that future generations will look back on today's decision as an unfortunate misstep." "Well, our next step is clear," Sommer said, "and that is to go to the New York state legislature and ask the elected officials who are here to represent all New Yorkers to do what's right—to do what's good for these families and the whole state of New York."

She added that, except for Pennsylvania, "every border jurisdiction—Ontario, Quebec, Massachusetts, Vermont, Connecticut, New Jersey—offer comprehensive legal statewide, jurisdiction-wide protections, ranging from the right to marry to civil unions to comprehensive domestic partnership. New York does not. We are woefully behind the times."

Alan Van Capelle, executive director of gay-rights group Empire State Pride Agenda, pledged to have marriage equality brought for a vote in the state legislature in 2007. "It took 31 years to pass a sexual-orientation nondiscrimination act—31 years for New York state to say that it was wrong to fire someone from their job, kick them out of their house, or deny them credit because of their sexual orientation," he said. "I promise the couples up here today it will not take 31 years to win marriage in the state of New York."

He added, "If the Teamsters on Long Island"—which recently came out in support of same-sex marriage—"can recognize marriage equality, then certainly the legislators in Albany can recognize marriage equality."

As for the plaintiffs themselves, they were disappointed with the court's ruling. "We're just asking the state of New York to acknowledge our relationship and protect us," said Cindy Bink, standing next to her partner of 18 years, Ann Pachner. (The Advocate)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • U.S. Politics From a Distance
    As America continues to rejoice in election of Barack Obama -- while gay Californians lament the passing of Prop. 8 -- overseas, political activists look on from a distance. Zachery Scott has watched the drama following Election Day unfold as he serves in the Peace Corps in Mozambique.
  • Shoshana Bean Is Lookin' for a Superhero
    Not many girls can wow a Broadway crowd in shows like Wicked and Hairspray, then turn around and bring the audience to its feet at the Soul Train Lady of Soul Awards. But Shoshana Bean goes far beyond what most people might expect, as evidenced by her soulful debut album, Superhero.
  • 30 Years Later, We Can Still Learn from Milk
    COMMENTARY: Thirty years after the death of Harvey Milk, Americans can still learn from his inspiring and profound work as an activist, politician and friend. With the story of his life opening in theatres this week, Lane Hudson takes a look back at how Milk's legacy lives on -- and what we can to do pay tribute to the legend.
  • Urban Cowboy
    How does a brand that is over a century old make itself cool again? With a little help from the gays. Levi Strauss & Co. sponsored the world premiere of Milk at the Castro Theatre in San Francisco in October, and The Advocate sat down with the out president of the denim company, Robert Hanson, that afternoon to find out what Levi's and Harvey Milk have in common.
  • L.A. Gay Center Responds to Prop. 8 Criticism
    In the December 16 edition of The Advocate, writer Ben Ehrenreich analyzed the differing opinions of why Prop. 8 passed at the polls in his article, "Anatomy of a Failed Campaign." Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center chief public affairs officer Jim Key responds to the criticisms raised by that article.
  • Billy Baldwin Pleads for Return of Dirty Sexy Money
    Actor William Baldwin is half of one of TV’s most groundbreaking couples -- his Dirty Sexy Money character is in love with a transsexual, played by Candis Cayne -- but it’s one plot that may not get to play itself out, as the show is in danger of cancellation. Baldwin sat down with Advocate.com to talk about rumors that ABC is "de-gaying" its lineup, what the future holds for Money, and whether network heads ever interfered with his controversial story line.
  • The Kid Stays in the Picture
    Lana Turner's lesbian daughter, Cheryl Crane, has penned her second memoir about her late, great movie star mother -- Lana: The Memories, the Myths, the Movies. Crane sits down with The Advocate to relive that fateful night she killed her mother's mobster lover, share some untold stories, and give us a sneak peek at the new photographs of their life together.
  • The Soul of Seal
    Armed with a new album of soul classics and his trademark blunt outlook on the state of the world, Seal sat down with Advocate.com to discuss the rumors that he and wife Heidi Klum would have left the country had John McCain been elected, the gay rights movement, and what makes Seal's sound so damn sexy.
  • Finding the Silver Lining in Defeat
    Three weeks ago, like many LGBT Americans, I woke up with, to say the least, mixed feelings. The euphoria of Barack Obama’s election and the expansion of the pro-LGBT majority in Congress was tempered by sadness and anger at our devastating losses in Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, and, of course, California. The silver lining of these defeats has been a renewed focus nationwide on the issue of marriage equality.
  • Separation of Sundance and State
    In 2009, Sundance will celebrate 25 years of bringing together international cinema and a variety of cultures in Park City, Utah. But with California's gay community reeling from the passage of Prop. 8, activists and filmmakers are suggesting a boycott of the festival and theater chain Cinemark, whose CEO donated a substantial sum to the marriage ban's campaign. But just how realistic is a boycott of an entire state?
  • Democratic Supermajority No Guarantee for Gay Progress
    The 2008 election may already be one for the record books, but triumphant Democrats are still vying for an elusive political prize -- the 60-seat supermajority required to overcome Republican filibuster attempts and advance their legislative agenda swiftly beginning in January. But what are the odds of actually getting 60 seats -- and will it really push gay rights to the front of the line?
  • From the Great White Way to the White House
    While there won’t be a woman in the White House anytime in the near future, 24 took the reins and elected to cast two-time Tony Award winner Cherry Jones as its first female president, Allison Taylor, who is likely to have everything including terrorists, WMDs, and the kitchen sink thrown at her. Jones sat down with The Advocateto talk marriage, the White House, and her "fluid" relationship with partner Sarah Paulson.
  • Handicapping the LGBT Priorities of President-elect Obama
    As the Obama-Biden transition ensues, insights are surfacing into the new administration's agenda for gay Americans. While many of the policy pronouncements read like a list of old favorites, some lesser-known initiatives will likely gain momentum early on.
  • A Fortune 500 Take on Prop. 8
    The old saying goes that every cloud has a silver lining. And on November 5, the day after California voters stripped same-sex couples of the right to marry, so many around the country were searching for one. Although thousands of individuals, organizations, and businesses donated to the Yes on 8 campaign, not one Fortune 500 company is among those names. But on the opposite side, the side of fairness and basic rights, you’ll find some of the nation’s most successful and powerful corporate players.
  • Chevy Volt: The Jolt GM Needs?
    Launching a new vehicle while the American auto industry is asking Congress for a $25 billion bailout might seem like illogical timing, but for General Motors and the people behind Chevy Volt, it’s essential. With their backs against the wall, GM is rolling out their much-anticipated first plug-in electric vehicle -- and focusing their marketing efforts on the gay community.
  • Dr. Phil Weighs in on Prop. 8
    Advocate.com gets an early peek at a very heated episode of Dr. Phil. Gavin Newsom, HRC's Joe Solmonese, and L.A. attorney Gloria Allred face off against Prop. 8 supporters to talk same-sex marriage. In what may well be a first, Dr. Phil told the audience he would be keeping his opinions to himself.
  • An Unpopular Opinion: Blacks, Gays, and Prop. 8
    The injection of race into the analysis of Proposition 8's passage is extremely disappointing. A battle for equal rights has now turned into an issue of whites versus blacks. But while some black gays think marriage shouldn't be a priority and that outreach to African-Americans should have been stronger, journalist Clay Cane says he has a vested interest in inequalities related to both race and sexual orientation ... and he doesn't need someone to hold his hand to believe that marriage equality is important.
  • Politics and Progress With Patti LaBelle
    The last time girl-group Labelle dropped an album, the thought of a black president or same-sex marriage seemed as “far-out” as the band’s disco-spacewoman suits and fusion of disco, rock, and soul. But the button-pushing, soul-singing trio has reunited, and on the heels of Prop. 8 passing and Barack Obama being elected president, Patti LaBelle talks to The Advocate about the mix of emotions she's dealt with over the past few weeks.
  • Seth Meyers's Big Gay Saturday Night
    SNL funnyman Seth Meyers talks to Advocate.com about last week's episode of Saturday Night Live -- the gayest episode in the history of the show, by some accounts. With touches including Justin Timberlake as Beyoncé's backup dancer and Snagglepuss crashing Weekend Update, it caused some bloggers to take offense ... but Meyers says it's just the sort of stuff that stemmed from many discussions about Prop. 8.
  • All Hands, Black and White, On Deck
    The high number of African-Americans who voted to pass Proposition 8 may have surprised some people, but not the folks at the National Black Justice Coalition, a civil rights organization dedicated to empowering black LGBT Americans. NBJC's CEO offers some insights about the black-white divide and how to mend it going forward.