
Support for
constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage is weak
in three of the eight states that will vote on them this
November, and in one—Colorado—a
competing measure to establish domestic partnerships for
same-sex couples is currently backed by a majority of
voters. The growing sense that key victories will be
had this Election Day is in stark contrast to 2004,
when constitutional bans on same-sex marriage were
approved in 13 states, USA Today reports.
"It could be a watershed year," Carrie Evans,
state legislative director at the gay lobby group
Human Rights Campaign, told the paper. Indeed, defeat
of even one of the proposed marriage bans would be a major
triumph, since all 19 state measures that have been voted on
to date were overwhelmingly approved, with support
averaging 70%.
This year, however, opposition to such a measure
in Arizona is currently at 51%, with only 38% of
voters supporting it, according to a recent poll,
while the proposed marriage ban in South Dakota is opposed
by 49% of voters, with 41% in support. In Colorado,
which has ballot measures both to ban same-sex
marriage and to create domestic partnerships, a recent
poll showed that only 52% of voters are in favor of the
former but that 58% favored the latter.
Pollsters attribute the erosion of support for
marriage bans to better-orchestrated opposition
campaigns as well as ever-increasing acceptance of gay
people. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.