
The governor of
Alaska called a special session of the
state legislature Friday to determine how the state
should pay court-ordered benefits for same-sex
domestic partners of state employees and retirees.
Gov. Frank Murkowski called the special session over the
objections of Lt. Gov. Loren Leman, who questioned his
authority to implement the regulations. The state is
facing a January 1 deadline.
Scott Nordstrand, commissioner of the Department
of Administration, said he wants to make sure the
regulations that are adopted can withstand any legal
challenge. ''This is to solve a very real problem in short
order,'' he said.
The 30-day session is scheduled to start
November 13. However, Nordstrand said if the
legislature, which did not take up the issue during its
regular session and two subsequent special sessions on the
natural gas pipeline contract, failed to implement
regulations, he would.
The issue goes back to 1999, when the American
Civil Liberties Union and nine couples filed a lawsuit
challenging the lack of benefits for same-sex partners
of those employed by the state and the
municipality of Anchorage. About a year ago, the state
supreme court ordered the state of Alaska to extend
benefits to same-sex couples, finding that denying
them violated the state's guarantee of equal
protection for all Alaskans because the state constitution
restricts marriage to a man and a woman.
The supreme court set a deadline of January 1
for having the benefits in place and sent the lawsuit
back to a lower court for implementation. Last month
superior court judge Stephanie Joannides sided with the ACLU
in finding that the regulations proposed by the state
were too restrictive. The judge also found that the
types of benefits to be offered to same-sex couples
were too narrow.
The proposed rules, for example, required that
same-sex couples attest to being in a committed
relationship for at least 12 months and document each
year they are still together. Joannides found that
requirement to be ''excessively burdensome.''
Michael Macleod-Ball, executive director of the
ACLU of Alaska, said the state's preliminary
regulations required same-sex couples to satisfy six
of nine criteria. After the judge's ruling, the state
''tweaked'' them to require five of eight be met, he said.
Macleod-Ball said he expected a response from
the court on the state's most recent proposal within
days. (Mary Pemberton, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.