
The United States may be seeing the beginning of the end of the scourge of crystal meth, at least among the workforce, according to a firm that performs millions of workplace drug tests every year.
Barry Sample, director of science and technology for Quest Diagnostics, which performs 10.4 million drug tests on employees every year in all 50 states, sees a downward trend in positive amphetamine and methamphetamine test results in the general U.S. workforce in 2005–2006.
Positive methamphetamine test results have now fallen to 2002 levels, indicating that the fashion for the drug may be waning among employees.
There was an 8% decline in samples that were positive for any amphetamine, including speed and ecstasy, in 2005, and a further 10% drop in the first six months of 2006. In 2005, one in 208 drug tests for amphetamines was positive, compared with one in 192 in 2004.
The proportion of positive amphetamine tests that were due to crystal meth showed a steeper decrease. There was a 31% decrease in the first five months of 2006 and a 45% decrease since 2004.
The proportion of tests for amphetamines that gave a positive result for crystal meth declined from one test in 303 in 2004 to one in 384 in 2005 and to one in 556 in the first six months of 2006.
Quest Diagnostics also released 2005 data for marijuana, cocaine, opiates, and PCP. These showed that positive drug tests in the workplace fell to the lowest level since Quest began publishing the data in 1988.
For the combined U.S. workforce, 4.1% had positive results in 2005, compared with 4.5% in 2004 and 13.6% in 1988. (Gus Cairns, UK.Gay.com)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.