
The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network is reporting that Adm. Michael Mullen, President Bush’s nominee to succeed Gen. Peter Pace as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was questioned about the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy on lesbian, gay, and bisexual personnel during a Senate hearing Tuesday.
Mullen said that while he would continue to implement the policy and dismiss gay soldiers, he added, “I really think it is for the American people to come forward, really through this body, to both debate that policy and make changes, if that's appropriate.” Mullen indicated that he would like Congress "to make its own decisions" with respect to considering a repeal of the ban. Pace, the current chairman of the Joint Chiefs, ignited controversy in March when he referred to gay sex as "immoral."
Just prior to his nomination as chairman, SLDN says Mullen told Tthe Brookings Institution in Washington, “If it’s time to revisit that policy...the American people ought to raise that issue and we’ll have the debate. As a member of the Joint Chiefs and obviously the head of one of the services, I will contribute to that and give my best military advice."
“Admiral
Mullen’s remarks are a welcome change of pace among
military leadership, where there has long been an
adversity to encouraging debate on opening the
services to lesbian and gay patriots,” said Sharra E.
Greer, director of law and policy for SLDN. “As
Senator [Susan] Collins rightly pointed out, there is
growing concern among the national security
establishment that the loss of talented gay troops is having
a detrimental impact on our armed forces.
Admiral Mullen should be applauded for his
willingness to take part in a national conversation
about that issue, and for his open-minded approach to
working with Congress as they consider the future of
‘don’t ask, don’t
tell.’”
During
her questioning, Collins noted that she had recently met
with a retired admiral in Maine who "urged" her to
press Mullen to reexamine the ‘don’t
ask, don’t tell’ policy.”
According to SLDN, the Military Readiness
Enhancement Act (H.R. 1246), a bill to lift the ban on
open service, is now supported by 126 members of the
House of Representatives. The supporters are drawn
from both parties. A recent poll of military personnel
found that 73% of those surveyed were comfortable
around gays, and CNN found last month that 79% of the
American public support repeal. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.