S.F. officials cancel Castro Halloween  | News | Advocate.com

||  News  ||
August 10, 2007
S.F. officials cancel Castro Halloween

San Francisco city officials are hoping for a quiet night in the Castro this October 31, announcing that there will be no official Halloween celebration, reports the San Francisco Chronicle.

"There will be no party," said Audrey Joseph, president of the city's entertainment commission, according to the newspaper.

Officials had planned to host a large outdoor concert near AT&T Park as an alternative to the Castro celebration, where a shooting last year injured nine people. But the concert promoter has decided the event is too much to handle and that there is not enough time to find another venue, Joseph said, according to the Chronicle.

Although the alternative celebration has been canceled, officials are still trying to keep the Castro empty come Halloween. According to the Chronicle, supervisor Bevan Dufty sent a letter to 110 local business owners asking them to keep their doors closed during the holiday.

Halloween has been a major community event—nicknamed the "gay Christmas," it draws several hundred thousand people to the Castro—but Dufty says the celebration has lived past its prime.

"It's not a holiday in the Castro. It's a night in which the neighborhood is overrun by people who come to gawk, not celebrate, and unfortunately, it turns into gang night out in the Castro," he said to the Chronicle.

To discourage partygoers, no streets will be closed for pedestrian traffic and no portable bathrooms will be provided. However, police will be deployed in numbers similar to last Halloween.

Café Flore, one of the Castro's most popular establishments, plans to close shop this Halloween.

"It's normally a big-money night, but it's just too crazy," manager Doug Forrester told the Chronicle. The café is only a few yards from where the shooting occurred last year.

Some residents have complained about the lack of public involvement in the decision-making process. Although a task force was scheduled to meet over the issue, once officials decided there would be no Castro Halloween, the group was disbanded.

Some residents think a successful celebration could take place.

"Other cities do this kind of thing all the time, and you don't hear about excessive violence, you don't hear about gay bashing," said Alix Rosenthal, who unsuccessfully challenged Dufty during his reelection campaign last year, to the Chronicle. She said a lack of commitment and resources—not homophobia—marred last year's celebration. (The Advocate)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.