
An ethics scholar at Northwestern University published a paper this summer claiming that controversial scholar and author J. Michael Bailey acted appropriately while researching his 2003 book about transsexuals, The Man Who Would Be Queen, according to an article in The Daily Northwestern.
Alice Dreger wrote in the report that critics conducted a smear campaign intended to ruin Bailey, also a professor at Northwestern, because they disagreed with the basic findings of his book.
“I am led by what I find to be true, not what I find to be popular,” Dreger told the newspaper.
In his book Bailey states that male-to-female transsexuals are either “homosexual transsexuals,” inherently feminine men who are attracted to men, or “autogynephilic transsexuals,” men who are aroused by the thought of having a woman’s body.
Transsexual activists Lynn Conway, Deirdre McCloskey, and Andrea James have questioned Bailey’s findings and research methods, claiming he refused to interview subjects who would disprove his theories. They attempted to have the book disqualified from consideration for a literature award and wanted Bailey investigated for reportedly practicing psychology without a license.
The more serious allegations, however, came from Bailey’s sources. Two transsexuals included in the book -- Anjelica Kieltyka and a woman referred to as “Juanita”-- claimed that Bailey wrote about them without their permission. Juanita further alleged that Bailey had sexual relations with her while conducting research for the book.
An ethics board began investigating Bailey’s work in 2004 but never released its findings.
Bailey continues to conduct sex research at Northwestern. He is now studying 1,000 pairs of gay brothers to explore the link between genes and sexual orientation.
Kieltyka, who was a friend of Bailey’s for 10 years, said she believes he is part of a broad conspiracy. In attempting to find a genetic cause for homosexuality, she said, his research implies that it is a disease that should be cured. She told The Daily Northwestern she plans to file a civil suit against Dreger for fraud. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.