
A Washington State lesbian has been awarded nearly $4.4 million in a lawsuit she filed against her former employer, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., and a supervisor, alleging unlawful retaliation that eventually led to her dismissal.
Melissa Sheffield claimed that her supervisors’ negative reaction to her sexuality was the beginning of a process that culminated in her demotion and termination.
In a November 8 decision, a jury in King County, Wash., awarded Sheffield more than $318,000 in lost past wages, more than $40,000 in lost and future benefits, and $4 million in emotional distress in a suit filed against the company and her former supervisor, Randy Reich.
According to a court brief filed by her attorneys, Sheffield, 47, began working at Goodyear store in Seattle in 1994 and became a store manager in 1999, a position in which she won a corporate excellence award. Things started going downhill at the end of 2002, after she brought her girlfriend to a managers' dinner that was also attended by another store manager, Waide Adams.
In 2003, Reich became Sheffield's new boss, and he made Adams her new team leader. Within six weeks Reich and Adams began investigating Sheffield, and they found billing improprieties and asked her to sign a statement acknowledging her mistakes. Sheffield complied. Soon after, a new service manager, Dave Johnson, was transferred to Sheffield’s store. The court brief states Johnson informed employees he knew Sheffield was gay and that he didn’t like gays. When Sheffield approached him about his bringing a gun to work (in violation of Goodyear policy), Johnson threatened to “pull it out and urinate all over [her] with it” if Sheffield made him mad. Sheffield alleged that Reich took no action when she lodged a complaint against Johnson and was retaliated against when she took the matter to corporate human resources.
The brief goes on to report that after a two-month investigation, Johnson was terminated, but Sheffield was demoted over the billing irregularities and an accusation from Johnson that she had engaged in “inappropriate kissing” at the store with her girlfriend. She was transferred to another store, where her pay went from $55,000 a year to $13 an hour. Because of an earlier on-the-job injury, Sheffield could not work the new job, since it required heavy lifting. After 18 months on a leave of absence for full worker’s compensation and physical rehab, Sheffield tried to return to work with the restriction on heavy lifting. A new district manager who replaced Reich refused to give her any position, and Sheffield was terminated. In her suit, Sheffield also claimed she was denied access to her personnel records.
“These events were devastating, but I wanted to take a stand for my children and my community, and I am grateful for the jury’s courage and understanding,” Sheffield said in a statement.”
“We were really pleased,” said attorney Daniel Johnson, who handled the case for Sheffield. “We always felt we were right and we would win. They [the jury] found the situation was intolerable. It was a strong statement to employers that this behavior was not acceptable.”
In a statement sent to The Advocate Friday, Goodyear said it “respectfully disagrees with the jury’s verdict in this case and is reviewing avenues to have it overturned or reversed. The company cannot discuss specific details of the case. Goodyear remains committed to fair work practices, including a work environment free from any discrimination or retaliation.”
According to the company’s Web site, Goodyear’s corporate nondiscrimination policy includes a zero-tolerance policy for harassment based on sexual orientation. (Chris Lisotta, The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.