CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Ordinances requiring people to obtain permits before they may distribute leaflets or make speeches at city parks have been struck down by a federal judge. Ruling on a lawsuit brought by preachers protesting gay pride activities, U.S. district judge William W. Caldwell said Monday that Harrisburg, Pa.'s ordinances requiring permits hindered protesters' free-speech rights without serving any government interest. But Caldwell refused to find that the city had misused the state's disorderly conduct statute in arresting the protesters when they got out of hand. The nine plaintiffs filed suit against Harrisburg and the city's mayor, Stephen R. Reed, earlier this year following a two-year string of incidents in which they clashed with authorities, mostly at gay pride events. The first incident occurred at a June 2000 ceremony to honor Civil War dead. Protesters objected because Reed had signed a proclamation that the group interpreted as praising the contributions of gay citizens. Four protesters, carrying signs that read, "Proof That America Condones Sodomy," sang hymns and handed out leaflets during the event. Accounts differ over what happened when they confronted the mayor, but the four were arrested and cited for disorderly conduct. The charges later were dismissed. In subsequent gay pride events, protesters banged drums and used megaphones to yell at people. While the protesters never sought a permit, they said the procedure for obtaining one violated First Amendment rights. Caldwell agreed that the permit process infringed on their right to free speech. "While [the ordinance] covers only two First Amendment activities, literature distribution and speeches, these represent important First Amendment rights that [the ordinance] would broadly limit," the judge wrote.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
November 14 2025 4:08 PM
True
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
November 16 2025 9:15 AM
True
Gay makeup artist Andry Hernández Romero describes horrific sexual & physical abuse at CECOT in El Salvador
July 24 2025 10:11 AM
True
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Health policy expert to RFK Jr.: You can't ban trans youth care this way
December 18 2025 5:37 PM
12 lesbian thrillers and mysteries to binge & where to watch them
December 18 2025 4:36 PM
Netflix's 'Boots' season 2 plot revealed by producer amid cancelation
December 18 2025 4:33 PM
Charlie Kirk's accused killer, Tyler Robinson, on LGBTQ+ issues: It's complicated
December 18 2025 4:04 PM
Sacramento man still in coma six weeks after suspected anti-LGBTQ+ hate crime
December 18 2025 1:17 PM
RFK Jr. and Dr. Oz announce sweeping measures to ban gender-affirming care for trans youth
December 18 2025 12:19 PM
True
Texas city will remove rainbow crosswalks under orders from Trump administration
December 18 2025 11:07 AM
Six key takeaways from Trump's speech to the nation, including 'transgender for everybody'
December 17 2025 10:51 PM
Marjorie Taylor Greene’s bill criminalizing gender-affirming care for minors passes with Democrats’ support
December 17 2025 6:47 PM
True
I didn’t just run the world’s major marathons. I changed them
December 17 2025 4:31 PM
Pam Bondi wants FBI to offer bounties for ‘radical gender ideology’ groups, leaked memo shows
December 17 2025 3:17 PM
Rock Hudson had a 'legendarily large penis,' Armistead Maupin says
December 17 2025 3:05 PM
































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes