CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
A federal judge in Washington State has backed the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act. The decision, made public Tuesday, is the first to address the constitutionality of the federal law, which defines marriage as a "legal union between one man and one woman." Two American women, Lee and Ann Kandu, were married in British Columbia and filed a joint bankruptcy petition in Tacoma a short time later. Their petition was opposed by the Justice Department on the grounds that the federal marriage law prohibited it. Federal bankruptcy judge Paul B. Snyder found that the bankruptcy code allows spouses to file joint petitions, noting, however, that the marriage law specifies that spouse refers only to a person of the opposite sex. Snyder found that gays and lesbians have no fundamental right to marriage and that the 1996 law does not violate the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution by allowing members of the opposite sex to wed but not members of the same sex. According to The New York Times, the decision is not binding on other courts, and the question of the constitutionality of the marriage law is likely to give rise to many decisions in coming years. The Defense of Marriage Act, signed into law by President Bill Clinton, has two significant provisions. One says that only heterosexual married couples can qualify for rights and benefits under federal programs that take marital status into account. A report by the General Accounting Office in 1997 said more than 1,000 federal laws were affected. The second significant provision of the marriage law allows states to decline to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. That aspect of the law was not an issue in Tacoma. Susan Sommer, a lawyer with gay rights advocacy group Lambda Legal, said Judge Snyder should have been more skeptical. ''The judge applied a sort of rubber-stamp approach,'' Sommer told the Times. "There is a fundamental right to marry that applies without exception to all people. You can't dole out fundamental rights only to some.''
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
31 Period Films of Lesbians and Bi Women in Love That Will Take You Back
December 09 2024 1:00 PM
18 of the most batsh*t things N.C. Republican governor candidate Mark Robinson has said
October 30 2024 11:06 AM
True
These 15 major companies caved to the far right and stopped DEI programs
January 24 2025 1:11 PM
True
Latest Stories
Even in liberal Massachusetts, Republicans are attacking trans athletes
April 10 2025 5:02 PM
Florida high school teacher loses job for using student's preferred name
April 10 2025 12:09 PM
Trump officials won't answer reporters' queries if they include pronouns in emails
April 10 2025 6:00 AM
Tennessee far-right pastor fears 'gay beam' airport scanner will make him queer
April 10 2025 5:17 AM