Major adoption
institute supports gay parents

As debate over the issue flares in several states, a major adoption institute says in a new report that it strongly supports the rights of gays and lesbians to adopt and urges that remaining obstacles be removed. "Laws and policies that preclude adoption by gay or lesbian parents disadvantage the tens of thousands of children mired in the foster care system who need permanent, loving homes," the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute says in the report to be issued Friday. It advises agencies and officials to make firm statements in support of such adoptions, forsaking a "don't ask, don't tell" approach that prompts some gays to feel their chances of adopting hinge on being discreet about their sexual orientation. Adoption agencies should energetically recruit gays and lesbians, including them in outreach programs and parenting panels, the institute said. The report arrives on the heels of a nationwide poll by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press that found public approval of adoption by gays is increasing. In 1999, 57% of Americans opposed the practice and 38% approved, while the new poll found 48% opposed and 46% in favor, with a margin of error of three percentage points. The divided sentiment has been reflected recently in Massachusetts, where Catholic Charities is ending its century-old adoption program rather than comply with a state law banning discrimination against gays. Florida is the only state with an outright ban on adoption by gays. Mississippi bars gay couples, but not single gays, from adopting; Utah requires adopting parents to be married. Some Florida legislators have been working unsuccessfully thus far to modify the state's ban and allow gay foster parents to adopt children already in their care. Measures have surfaced in a few other states that gay rights advocates fear would restrict adoption by gays or undermine gay families. In Arizona, the senate is considering a house-passed bill that would give married couples priority over single people in adopting children who are in state custody. Family Pride, a national group representing gay and lesbian families, says the bill is discriminatory because gays cannot legally marry in any state but Massachusetts. In Utah, Gov. Jon Huntsman this week vetoed a bill vigorously opposed by gay rights groups that would have allowed biological parents to terminate their child's relationship with third parties, such as same-sex partners. The bill stemmed from a custody dispute between two lesbians; the biological mother sought to prohibit her ex-partner from visiting her daughter. In Ohio, conservative lawmakers introduced a bill to ban placement of an adoptive child in a household where anyone is gay. House speaker Jon Husted does not intend to let the bill advance to a vote, spokeswoman Tasha Hamilton said. The bill's chief sponsor, Rep. Ron Hood, contends that children raised by gay parents face increased risk of physical and emotional problems. His concerns are shared by many conservative groups that argue that same-sex partnerships are less stable than heterosexual marriages. The Donaldson study, written by Illinois State University adoption expert Jeanne Howard, acknowledges that research on gay parenting remains relatively scant. "Still, virtually every valid study reaches the same conclusion: The children of gays and lesbians adjust positively, and their families function well," the report says. The report was funded by the Gill Foundation and the Human Rights Campaign, both active in gay rights causes. The Donaldson Institute's executive director, Adam Pertman, said the financial sponsorship did not influence the report's findings. It concluded by suggesting that gay parents could play a major role in reducing the backlog of more than 110,000 children in foster care awaiting adoption. (AP)