California's top
newspapers all seem to agree -- whether it's right or
wrong, the California supreme court seems prepared to uphold
Prop. 8.
From the
Los Angeles Times
: "The California Supreme Court appeared ready today to
uphold Proposition 8, the November ballot measure that banned
gay marriage, but also seemed likely to decide -- perhaps
unanimously -- that the marriages of same-sex couples who wed
before the election would remain valid."
From the
Sacramento Bee
: "Chief Justice Ron George noted that the California
constitution has been properly amended hundreds of times, much
more frequently than the U.S. constitution. He raised the
possibility that the change gay-marriage proponents oppose is
simply the result of California's system, which gives the
people the right to amend the constitution through the
initiative process. But the court also cast a skeptical eye on
the argument made by supporters of the ban that the nearly
19,000 marriages that were performed between June and the
passage of Proposition 8 should not be valid or
recognized."
From the
San Francisco Chronicle:
"The California Supreme Court, which last year declared
the right of gays and lesbians to marry, appeared ready today
to uphold the voters' decision to overrule the court and
restore the state's ban on same-sex marriage. 'There
have been initiatives that have taken away rights from
minorities by majority vote' and have been upheld, said
Chief Justice Ronald George. 'Isn't that the system we
have to live with?'"
From the
Oakland Tribune:
"Those urging the California Supreme Court to invalidate
Proposition 8's ban on same-sex marriage seemed to have had
a tough row to hoe Thursday, peppered by justices'
questions on balancing marriage rights with voters' rights
to change the state constitution. After three hours of
arguments, it seemed as though the seven justices leaned
against voiding the 18,000 same-sex marriages performed last
year, but their stance on Proposition 8's constitutionality
was less clear."