CONTACTStaffCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2024 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
While Uganda's proposed "kill the gays" bill has grabbed the attention of the LGBT world, many straight Americans have never even heard of it -- or the American influence behind the bill. Wednesday night Current TV will premiere an episode dedicated to the bill on its documentary series, Vanguard. "Missionaries of Hate" delves into the issue, with Peabody Award-winning journalist Mariana van Zeller traveling to the heart of hate in Uganda.
Van Zeller spoke with Ugandan pastors like Martin Ssempa and American evangelicals like Scott Lively, both of whom have stirred up more homophobia in a nation already extremely antigay to begin with. Pregnant at the time, van Zeller also reached out to gay Ugandans, who wanted to speak on the increasingly desperate situation there. Back home in Los Angeles, van Zeller talked with The Advocate about her experiences in Uganda and provided more insight on what is really going on there.
The Advocate: Were you hesitant to take the story?
Mariana van Zeller: Not at all. The first time I saw a news clip on this bill, I immediately thought we had to do this story. I couldn't believe this was happening. Shortly after, I started reading about the influence of American evangelicals and the strong belief that they influenced this bill. A couple of weeks later, we were on a plane to Uganda. We wanted to investigate what exactly was the role of American evangelicals on this bill and also what was life like for gays in Uganda and how things stand to change if this bill is passed.
What are the conditions like in the country? Are gays being scapegoated for issues like poverty and instability?
Unfortunately, homophobia exists across Africa. What Uganda has done is take it to another level. The hate that is being propagated in Uganda right now is extremely scary.
Uganda is a poor country; 30% of its income is dependent on foreign aid. But it's politically stable, even though it had a war for many years that brought down the economy. The war faded and it's been a stable country; it has stable leadership compared to other African nations. However, one of the questions we asked to many of these pastors was, "With so many problems like AIDS and poverty, why make this your main focus?" What they replied over and over again was that the family is the base of African culture and they believe that family values are being destroyed by what they call the "gay agenda," and so this is where they have to start their battles. If this isn't taken care of, then everything else is at risk, which is of course, ridiculous.
Is there an ulterior motive with the people pushing this bill, like [member of parliament David] Bahati and Pastor Martin Ssempa?
Absolutely. Over 90% of the population is against homosexuality, which is a staggering statistic. Both Bahati and Ssempa really used this to increase their popularity. You can see that with a person like David Bahati, who was a relatively unknown politician before this and is now one of the most well-known people not only inside Uganda but around the world. The same thing happened with Pastor Ssempa -- he's been a popular pastor, but this has taken his popularity to a whole new level. What has surprised us is that he is extremely popular among young people. The majority of his congregation is young people. He holds church rallies every Saturday night at Makerere University, one of the most prestigious universities in East Africa, and it's always packed with college students. His Sunday morning services are always packed with young people and are also held at the university.
To actually interview some of these young people is to see how they believe and trust every word Ssempa says; it's incredible. They really think homosexuals are evil and should be put in prison for life, and some actually said to us that "they should be killed."
The antigay agenda seems to be
pushed by an emphasis on the mechanics of certain sexual practices. Is
that their ticket to turning people against gays?
Absolutely.
They're using a lot of the same language that is being used by some
American evangelicals here when they talk about the threats of the gay
agenda: the recruitment of children, the fact that gays aren't born this
way, that it's a choice.
We were there reporting when the bill
was really heating up, when Ssempa had become the face of this campaign
and he was holding weekly church rallies and mass protests all around
Uganda in support of the bill. Again and again, he would show gay porn
because he thought it was important to show people what gay people do in
the privacy of their home because. He'd say, "You know, [gays] say it's
not our business what they do in the privacy of their own bedroom, but
let me show you what they do in the privacy of their bedroom." Obviously
it's a completely distorted image of what gays do. He's showing
fisting, very graphic images in front of congregations of hundreds of
people, children included. He's showing, as he calls it, the "eating of
poo-poo" -- and so that's what people think represents gay
sex. So, after seeing and hearing this, they think gays from the West
are coming into their country and actively recruiting children into
homosexuality, and then the result of that is they want gays jailed or
killed.
It seemed almost impossible to find someone who would
defend gays. Is the national homophobia as widespread as it appears in
your story?
It is, and that was extremely surprising to us. We went to
the market with a man named Long Johns who is gay, and he asked people at the market, who didn't know he was gay, what they thought of this bill and what they thought of gays, and then we saw his
reaction. The majority of people said gays deserve life in prison or death.
Unfortunately, it really is the majority of the country [that holds that opinion].
There must be educated people who know this propaganda is not true. Why are they not speaking up?
There was a human rights conference that was held mainly to speak about this bill. There was an American professor invited and human rights and gay activists that got together and spoke about how unconstitutional and against human rights this bill was. Shortly after the conference started, a member of parliament stood up and basically took over the conference and used some of the harshest words I'd heard in Uganda. He said he hopes this bill is introduced and he hopes he is allowed to be a hangman and allowed to hang gays. I tracked him down after the conference and asked him a few questions. He said it's not just me or David Bahati who believes this, it's 90% of Ugandan parliament [that] is against homosexuality and feels, some way or another, this bill should be passed. So this idea that it's some crazy nut in Uganda and the majority doesn't think this way is not true.
How do
the gay Ugandans keep up their spirits?
One of our main goals for
going to Uganda was to find out what life was like for gay Ugandans.
We've seen news clips and things written about the bill but we wanted to
get as close as we could to gays in Uganda so we could get a sense
of what life was like. We knew it was going to be challenging because
there's a lot of fear in the community, so we didn't know how many would
speak on camera because they're risking their lives. It
was amazing how many people were willing to speak on camera, including
Long Johns, who opened up his life to us. He said, "There can be risk involved by showing my face, but I believe this is the right thing
to do. I want to raise awareness of what is happening in my country and
among my peers. I believe by showing my face, I can make a difference."
Was
it scary reporting the story?
Never scary for me. More scary for
the people we were interviewing. We had one young gay man named Gerald
who agreed to be interviewed and we asked, "Would you feel comfortable
doing this interview walking down the street?" He immediately said,
"Yes, I can take you to the neighborhood where I grew up." During that
conversation he kept pointing out people looking at us. He said there
were certain words I can't say like "homosexual," so we were using code
words. He knew if we used certain words, we could get attention, and he
said, "If they find out I'm gay and speaking to you, a group could come
up and start beating me." In fact, during one point in our conversation,
one taxi driver kept giving him intimidating looks. At that point we
stopped the interview.
Was it hard to remain objective?
Yes. It was extremely difficult to keep quiet while you're listening to
all these religious men and politicians who have enormous influence
saying these outrageous remarks. However, our role there was to get them
as comfortable as possible so they could speak as openly as possible,
so that we could show people around the world what is actually happening
in Uganda.
You know, I was four and a half months pregnant in Uganda. At one point it came out to Ssempa and other pastors that I was pregnant. Their first reaction was for them to put their hands on my belly and start praying for my baby to not be homosexual. I really had to contain myself not to say, "Stop it. Take your hands off my belly; my baby can be whoever he wants to be." But I thought it was important to let it go so that I could interview him and really get his thoughts on homosexuality and get his message back to the United States.
The segment delves into American evangelicals coming over and spreading antigay animus. Do you think there will be fewer pastors coming to Uganda because they don't want to be attached to legislation involving execution?
There have been many American evangelicals who have distanced themselves from this bill, and one of them is Rick Warren. Warren has very close ties to Ssempa -- Ssempa actually called Warren a wimp -- "He comes to Uganda and says homosexuality is evil and then he goes to the United States and says this bill is wrong."
But it hasn't stopped American evangelicals from going to Uganda. Just in the beginning of May, Lou Engle from a group called TheCall, who was involved in the passing of Prop. 8, visited Uganda and attended a rally that had all the main players of the bill there. Even though he didn't say he wasn't for this bill, he said Uganda was ground zero and Ugandans should stay firm in the face of evil. That had enormous damage. Many American evangelicals have condemned the bill, but as many gays in Uganda have told us, sending out a press release is not enough. This bill has an American face to it, especially to the gay community in Uganda. What they pinpoint again and again is this March 2009 conference where they say things really took a turn for the worse -- it was attended by these three American evangelicals. Since then, the path to legislation is being pushed by men who have long histories with American evangelicals. These evangelicals need to go to Uganda and take back what they previously said, and say, "This bill is wrong and we absolutely condemn it." We haven't seen anyone do that.
American evangelical Scott Lively told you Uganda is a Christian nation, while America is not. Is that part of the reason people like him are going to Uganda, because their voices are no longer being heard in the U.S.?
Absolutely. Scott Lively is not really taken seriously in the U.S. This is the guy who wrote The Pink Swastika that says gays are responsible for the Holocaust; he's sort of a fringe character. But he goes to Uganda and he's treated like Billy Graham. There's a certain amount of credibility one has in Uganda just by being an American, so every word they say there carries a lot of weight. So it shouldn't have been a surprise that a month after the evangelicals' March 2009 visit, this bill was introduced in parliament.
The bill seems to be dying a slow
death. What do you think will happen?
It looks like it might indeed be dying. But next year is an
election year in Uganda, and with over 90% of the population being
against homosexuality, President Yoweri Museveni has a really tough
choice to make. He can risk losing public support and votes if he
condemns the bill, or he can risk losing foreign aid by pushing the
bill. So things are very much up in the air.
What has the president said about the
bill publicly?
He issued one statement that I know of. He
didn't say whether he supported it or not. He said, "It's incredible,
with all the problems that exist in this country, that Hillary Clinton is
now obsessed with this." Many supporters of this antigay campaign took
that as a veiled endorsement because they thought he was saying
Americans should mind their own business.
Is the bill dying simply out of practical
reasons?
I think there's an enormous amount of international
pressure on president Museveni right now.
Is the typical Ugandan aware of the
financial ramifications of this bill passing?
No, in fact, when we confronted Ugandans on this, they said, "We can live
perfectly without foreign aid. It's more important for us to put
homosexuals in prison."
Nbroverman
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
18 of the most batsh*t things N.C. Republican governor candidate Mark Robinson has said
October 30 2024 11:06 AM
True
After 20 years, and after tonight, Obama will no longer be the Democrats' top star
August 20 2024 12:28 PM
Trump ally Laura Loomer goes after Lindsey Graham: ‘We all know you’re gay’
September 13 2024 2:28 PM
60 wild photos from Folsom Street East that prove New York City knows how to play
June 21 2024 12:25 PM
Melania Trump cashed six-figure check to speak to gay Republicans at Mar-a-Lago
August 16 2024 5:57 PM
Latest Stories
Marjorie Taylor Greene gets booed after talking about trans kids at the Supreme Court
December 05 2024 11:16 AM
Pro golf's new policies for trans women golfers push out player
December 05 2024 10:01 AM
The 2025 Australian Firefighter Calendar is here, and it's as hot as ever
December 04 2024 10:30 PM
Inspiring and wise quotes from LGBTQ+ celebs, legends, and advocates A-Z
December 04 2024 9:35 PM
Trending stories
Recommended Stories for You
Neal Broverman
Neal Broverman is the Editorial Director, Print of Pride Media, publishers of The Advocate, Out, Out Traveler, and Plus, spending more than 20 years in journalism. He indulges his interest in transportation and urban planning with regular contributions to Los Angeles magazine, and his work has also appeared in the Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He lives in the City of Angels with his husband, children, and their chiweenie.
Neal Broverman is the Editorial Director, Print of Pride Media, publishers of The Advocate, Out, Out Traveler, and Plus, spending more than 20 years in journalism. He indulges his interest in transportation and urban planning with regular contributions to Los Angeles magazine, and his work has also appeared in the Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He lives in the City of Angels with his husband, children, and their chiweenie.