CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
The University of Pittsburgh and a civil liberties group are heading back to court nine months after a school panel recommended that the university not offer health benefits to the same-sex partners of its employees. Pitt filed a motion recently seeking to permanently bar the city from hearing a lawsuit involving seven former and current workers who allege the university discriminated against them by denying their partners such benefits. The American Civil Liberties Union plans to fight the motion and has until January 21 to respond in court. Both sides remain at odds seven years after former Pitt employee Deborah Henson filed a complaint with the Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations, saying the school violated the city's 1990 gay rights law that prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation. Six others later joined her in the pending class-action lawsuit. In 2000, Pitt won an injunction from Allegheny County judge Robert Gallo to bar the commission from hearing the lawsuit, on the basis that the city law exceeded the scope of the state's Human Relations Act. The school also noted that a state law exempts public universities from local laws that mandate that health benefits be extended to domestic partners; Pitt is a state-affiliated school with 9,500 employees. The most recent court filing seeks to make the injunction permanent. Witold Walczak, legal director of the ACLU's Pittsburgh chapter, warned that a permanent injunction would dismantle discrimination protection. "If they win that argument, it would essentially wipe out any rights sexual minorities have," he said. Walczak called Pitt's position "bigoted and increasingly obsolete," adding that more colleges and universities move toward offering health benefits to same-sex couples.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Ahead of deadly Texas floods, so many warnings from climate scientists were missed
July 12 2025 7:00 AM
Yes, Superman is an immigrant. He's also a gay icon.
July 11 2025 12:31 PM
Louisiana Medicaid quietly stops reimbursing patients for gender-affirming care
July 11 2025 3:35 PM
15 best LGBTQ-friendly all-inclusive resorts for honeymoons
July 11 2025 12:29 PM
Trump's DOJ subpoenas doctors and medical clinics that care for transgender youth
July 11 2025 9:36 AM
True
After trans people, Trump now erases bisexual people from Stonewall National Monument
July 10 2025 10:45 PM
Donald Trump threatens to revoke Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship — but he can't
July 12 2025 6:04 PM
Harvard seemingly caves to Trump, shuts down LGBTQ+ and women's center websites
July 11 2025 3:08 PM
11 lesbian & sapphic reality dating shows & where to watch them
July 11 2025 12:49 PM