The California
supreme court on Wednesday agreed to hear a case that will
decide whether doctors can deny treatment to gay and lesbian
patients solely on religious grounds, the Associated
Press reports. The high court said it will review the
case of two Southern California fertility doctors,
Christine Brody and Douglas Fenton, who refused to
artificially inseminate a lesbian. The Christian
doctors, however, do not object to treating married
patients requiring insemination.
"These physicians
do not believe that it is necessarily appropriate for
a woman to have a baby out of wedlock," the doctors'
attorney, Robert Tyler, told the AP. "Should a
Christian be forced to artificially inseminate an
unmarried woman when it goes contrary to their
sincerely held religious beliefs?"
Jennifer Pizer, a
Lambda Legal attorney who's representing the plaintiff,
Guadalupe Benitez, said it's discrimination under state law
for the doctors to refuse treatment. The core issue of
the case, she said, "is whether religious beliefs
provide a free pass, or an exception, to the civil
rights law."
Pizer noted that
doctors are allowed to opt out of end-of-life procedures
but shouldn't be allowed to say that they'll "pull the plug
based on whether you're married or not."
The California
Medical Association told the lower courts that legal and
ethical standards prohibit physicians from discriminating
but allow them to refuse to perform certain
procedures on religious grounds if they refuse such
treatment for all patients. The association originally
backed the two fertility doctors but later withdrew
that support.
A state appeals
court last year sided with Brody and Fenton. Benitez, who
was artificially inseminated elsewhere and now has a
4-year-old boy, appealed. The supreme court justices
neither commented on the case Wednesday nor said when
they would decide the outcome. (The Advocate)