October 16 2006 4:23 PM EST
CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Monday, Hong Kong's government gave in to a challenge to its gay sex laws, lowering the age of consent from 21 to 16. The decision followed a humiliating government defeat in court system after an appeal against a judicial review's decision that the law governing the age of homosexual consent was unconstitutional.
Hong Kong's Security Bureau said in a statement that it would not seek to challenge the court's decision. "After considering all the relevant factors, the government decided not to appeal the judicial review."
Since Hong Kong only decriminalized homosexuality in 1991, gay and lesbian youths had faced life imprisonment if they were caught having sex before the age of 21. Their heterosexual counterparts, however, faced a five-year sentence. In a decision made by the courts in September, the law was rendered unenforceable.
"I fail to see on any basis the justification of this age limit," chief high court judge Geoffrey Ma wrote in his judgment last month. "No evidence has been placed before us to explain why the minimum age requirement for buggery is 21 whereas as far as sexual intercourse between a man and a woman is concerned, the age of consent is only 16."
The case was originally brought to the courts by William Leung, a 21-year-old gay man.
His lawyer, Michael Vidler, hailed the government decision in a statement. "Now they are not appealing it, which means they accept the fact and the court's judgment. It's about time the government initiates steps to remove the law without further delay. Failure to do so will be a slap in the face for the constitution." (The Advocate)
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
November 14 2025 4:08 PM
True
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
November 16 2025 9:15 AM
True
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Health policy expert to RFK Jr.: You can't ban trans youth care this way
December 18 2025 5:37 PM
12 lesbian thrillers and mysteries to binge & where to watch them
December 18 2025 4:36 PM
Netflix's 'Boots' season 2 plot revealed by producer amid cancelation
December 18 2025 4:33 PM
Charlie Kirk's accused killer, Tyler Robinson, on LGBTQ+ issues: It's complicated
December 18 2025 4:04 PM
Sacramento man still in coma six weeks after suspected anti-LGBTQ+ hate crime
December 18 2025 1:17 PM
RFK Jr. and Dr. Oz announce sweeping measures to ban gender-affirming care for trans youth
December 18 2025 12:19 PM
True
Texas city will remove rainbow crosswalks under orders from Trump administration
December 18 2025 11:07 AM
Six key takeaways from Trump's speech to the nation, including 'transgender for everybody'
December 17 2025 10:51 PM
Marjorie Taylor Greene’s bill criminalizing gender-affirming care for minors passes with Democrats’ support
December 17 2025 6:47 PM
True
I didn’t just run the world’s major marathons. I changed them
December 17 2025 4:31 PM
Pam Bondi wants FBI to offer bounties for ‘radical gender ideology’ groups, leaked memo shows
December 17 2025 3:17 PM
Rock Hudson had a 'legendarily large penis,' Armistead Maupin says
December 17 2025 3:05 PM
Trending stories
Recommended Stories for You




































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes