October 16 2006 4:23 PM EST
CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Monday, Hong Kong's government gave in to a challenge to its gay sex laws, lowering the age of consent from 21 to 16. The decision followed a humiliating government defeat in court system after an appeal against a judicial review's decision that the law governing the age of homosexual consent was unconstitutional.
Hong Kong's Security Bureau said in a statement that it would not seek to challenge the court's decision. "After considering all the relevant factors, the government decided not to appeal the judicial review."
Since Hong Kong only decriminalized homosexuality in 1991, gay and lesbian youths had faced life imprisonment if they were caught having sex before the age of 21. Their heterosexual counterparts, however, faced a five-year sentence. In a decision made by the courts in September, the law was rendered unenforceable.
"I fail to see on any basis the justification of this age limit," chief high court judge Geoffrey Ma wrote in his judgment last month. "No evidence has been placed before us to explain why the minimum age requirement for buggery is 21 whereas as far as sexual intercourse between a man and a woman is concerned, the age of consent is only 16."
The case was originally brought to the courts by William Leung, a 21-year-old gay man.
His lawyer, Michael Vidler, hailed the government decision in a statement. "Now they are not appealing it, which means they accept the fact and the court's judgment. It's about time the government initiates steps to remove the law without further delay. Failure to do so will be a slap in the face for the constitution." (The Advocate)
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
November 14 2025 4:08 PM
True
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
November 16 2025 9:15 AM
True
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
How No Kings aims to build 'protest muscle' for the long term
December 30 2025 7:00 AM
Missing Black trans man Danny Siplin found dead in Rochester, New York
December 29 2025 8:45 PM
'Heated Rivalry' season 2: every steamy & romantic moment from the book we can't wait to see
December 29 2025 5:27 PM
Chappell Roan apologizes for praising late Brigitte Bardot: 'very disappointing'
December 29 2025 4:30 PM
RFK Jr.'s HHS investigates Seattle Children's Hospital over youth gender-affirming care
December 29 2025 1:00 PM
Zohran Mamdani claps back after Elon Musk attacks out lesbian FDNY commissioner appointee
December 29 2025 11:42 AM
Trump's gay Kennedy Center president demands $1M from performer who canceled Christmas Eve show
December 29 2025 10:09 AM
What does 2026 have in store for queer folks? Here’s what's written in the stars
December 29 2025 9:00 AM
In 2025, being trans in America means living under conditional citizenship
December 29 2025 6:00 AM
Here are the best shows on and off-Broadway of 2025
December 26 2025 7:00 AM
10 of the sexiest music videos that gagged everyone in 2025
December 25 2025 9:30 AM
Far-right, anti-LGBTQ+ Project 2025 will continue into 2026
December 24 2025 6:34 PM
Democratic officials sue RFK Jr. over attempt to limit gender-affirming care for trans youth
December 24 2025 4:30 PM
Heated Rivalry season 2: Everything we know so far
December 24 2025 3:30 PM
Who is Lillian Bonsignore — set to be first out gay Fire Department of New York commissioner?
December 23 2025 6:21 PM
True
Trending stories
Recommended Stories for You




































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes