|| News ||
Page 1 of 1

Op-ed: NPR Should Apologize for Parroting “Ex-Gay” Propaganda

The founder of the gay rights group that recently put “reparative therapy” in the headlines with its hidden-camera investigation of Marcus Bachmann's clinics calls on NPR to apologize for a story it did reacting to the controversy.

NPR MARCUS BACHMANN 390x (GETTY) ADVOCATE.COM
NPR ran a story about conversion therapy in reaction to controversy caused by practices at Marcus Bachmann's Christian counseling clinics.

In a recent television show discussing “ex-gay” therapy, renowned author and psychiatrist Jack Drescher put the discredited practice in its proper perspective: “This is so far outside the mainstream it's practically on Mars.”

Unfortunately, the media keeps putting on its space suit and blasting off with “ex-gay” propaganda that places its debunked theories on par with legitimate therapy backed by the American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, American Medical Association, and American Academy of Pediatrics.

We’ve come to expect such farce from the Fox “News” Channel, run by the reprobate Rupert Murdoch. However, the elevation of “ex-gay” junk science all too often occurs in the allegedly “liberal media.” (Or is it Lazy Media?)

For example, NPR aired a segment this week that inexplicably claimed, “The debate about the value of conversion therapy, also known as reparative therapy, has been raging in psychological circles for more than a decade.”

In reality, the debate began to ebb in 1973, when the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from its list of mental disorders. In 2009 the American Psychological Association conducted an exhaustive study on the efficacy of “ex-gay” therapy. The press release said it all: “No evidence that sexual orientation change efforts work, says APA,” and “Practitioners should avoid telling clients that they can change from gay to straight.”

What about this vivid APA statement isn’t clear to media outlets like NPR?

There is absolutely no “debate about the value of conversion therapy” taking place among real scientists. What we have on one hand are genuine researchers who believe the issue has long been settled, and on the other hand a politically motivated marketing campaign by the “ex-gay” industry with the goal of tricking news outlets into thinking a controversy is actually occurring.

It is depressing that NPR, a top-notch news organization, was so easily hoodwinked and ended up parroting the antigay party line. I can only imagine the exuberant high fives at the headquarters of the “ex-gay” group People Can Change when they realized that NPR had bought their baloney.

The erosion of good journalism has much to do with the “Foxification” of news — where the ethos of accuracy is superseded by the corrosive value of balance. In this culture of news corruption, extremists with viewpoints from Mars are placed side by side with experts from Earth. To the casual viewer, the media platform given to the inane creates a false equivalency with the respected ideas of the sane. This pollutes the mainstream and weakens our national identity, which relies on a general consensus regarding agreed-upon, scientifically valid facts.

The “science” used to bolster the “ex-gay” myth has always been weak, but in recent years the entire house of cards has collapsed. First, there is the aforementioned 2009 APA study, which placed the entire weight of the mental health community squarely against “ex-gay” therapy.

Second, the revelation that the infamous Masters and Johnson’s 1979 book Homosexuality in Perspective was a hoax badly undermined “ex-gay” efforts. William H. Masters and Virginia E. Johnson, the husband-and-wife sex research team, went on Meet the Press Sunday, April 22, 1979, to discuss their findings that claimed they had converted homosexuals into heterosexuals. However, in his groundbreaking recent book, Masters of Sex, author Thomas Maier documented through investigative reporting that the results of Masters and Johnson’s study were entirely fabricated. Virginia Johnson even acknowledged that the results were fake.

A third blow came with the findings in June by researcher Jim Burroway and CNN’s AC 360 that undermined one of the most significant “ex-gay” studies. Prior to getting caught with an escort from RentBoy.com, George Rekers was the “ex-gay” industry’s most prominent therapist. Even after this tawdry scandal, Rekers's research touting the alleged sexual conversion of a boy named “Kraig” was still widely cited by “ex-gay” therapists. Burroway and CNN discovered, however, that “Kraig” had grown up to be a gay man and his family believed the therapy with Rekers may have led to his suicide.

Anecdotal evidence also undermines the “ex-gay” myth. In 1998, 15 antigay organizations backed a million-dollar campaign featuring “ex-gay” poster boys John Paulk and Michael Johnston. In 2000, I photographed Paulk in a Washington, D.C., gay bar. In 2003, Virginia attorney Michael Hamar and I revealed that Johnston was having intercourse with men he met men online. Prior to this, the founder of Homosexuals Anonymous, Colin Cook, had to step down after engaging in sexual acts with his clients. Two of Exodus International’s cofounders, Michael Bussee and Gary Cooper, left their wives to marry each other.

What we are left with are fantastical tales of transformation from individuals like People Can Change’s Rich Wyler, who runs the profitable Journey Into Manhood (JIM), seminar. In this program, grown men spend $650 for a weekend in the woods, blaming their parents for the fact that they are gay, and hugging and petting other closeted homosexuals in an allegedly nonsexual manner.

On the NPR segment, Wyler also made the specious and scientifically bankrupt claim that he turned gay because he wasn’t close to his father. That defies logic and ignores the countless gay men, such as myself, who are close to their fathers. Why didn’t NPR adequately challenge this phony cause-and-effect drivel spouted by Wyler?

The media outlet also did not question Wyler on his creepy form of hugging therapy that allegedly takes place in what journalist Ted Cox, who reported from inside JIM weekend, called the “Cuddle Room.” Sadly, NPR reduced what should have been a serious investigation into the real harm caused by “ex-gay” therapy into a tit-for-tat and did virtually nothing to challenge the false claims made in the segment.

Substandard reporting on this topic is not unique to NPR. Earlier this year, the Oprah Winfrey Network’s Our America With Lisa Ling produced what may have been the shallowest program on this issue in recent memory. She basically took what “ex-gay” activists said at face value and did nothing to challenge their outrageous claims.

The news media used to be an ally in debunking the “ex-gay” myth. But these days journalists often don’t do their homework, which inadvertently allows “ex-gay” activists to promote junk science. This phenomenon is difficult to stop because the media love a good freak show. and the spectacle of “ex-gays” is perfect for boosting ratings. Some talk show producers are so desperate to book “ex-gays” that they unethically allow these activists to pick their on-air opponents and blacklist others so they have an easier time disseminating misinformation. For instance, I have learned that Exodus International’s president, Alan Chambers, has told at least four different television producers that if I were interviewed, no “ex-gays” would appear on their shows.

It is of great significance that the news media and talk shows get this issue right because hateful antigay propaganda creates a hostile climate and has consequences. A 2010 Intelligence Report by the Southern Poverty Law Center puts the problem in perspective: Homosexuals or perceived homosexuals are by far the group most targeted in America for violent hate crimes, according to an Intelligence Report analysis of 14 years of federal hate-crime data. The bottom line: Gay people are more than twice as likely to be attacked in a violent hate crime as Jews or blacks; more than four times as likely as Muslims; and 14 times as likely as Latinos.

It is incredibly disappointing that NPR exacerbated the situation by allowing falsehoods to flower and fiction to obscure fact. It owes LGBT people an apology for not adhering to its usually rigorous standards. When we hear NPR, we don’t expect it to mean Nonsensical Propaganda from the Right.

Wayne Besen is the founder of Truth Wins Out, which fights the notion of conversion therapy. 

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. Page 1 of 1
Reader Comments
  • Name: Hugh
    Date posted: 8/4/2011 1:29:27 AM
    Hometown: Dallas

    Comment:

    Great article Mr. Bessen! And to find such professional journalism in this rag? Even better. So refreshing to read something intelligent and thought provoking in The Advocate. More of this please.

  • Name: Marty
    Date posted: 8/3/2011 2:24:05 PM
    Hometown: San Francisco

    Comment:

    I listened to the piece and was truly puzzled why the person claiming to be ex-gay was not challenged on why he thought being gay was incompatible with leading a church-going life with close contact to his family. It seemed obvious to me that if the reporter had done her research and understood how discredited conversion therapy truly is, then she would have pressed on what appears to be the core issue that being gay does not disqualify a person from having a life that can be filled with family, children, love and even religion. I expect, and normally get, better from NPR. This was disappointing, to say the least.

  • Name: AJD
    Date posted: 8/3/2011 1:21:15 PM
    Hometown: NYC

    Comment:

    The problem is that many journalists have lost the ability to distinguish valid arguments supported by evidence from politically or financially motivated balderdash, taking journalism's duty to present all sides of an issue too far and presenting scientific facts as mere opinions. This is why the battle over evolution in public schools was presented as a "debate" between two equal and opposing sides rather than an attack on science by unlettered religious fanatics, and why climate change is presented as the subject of genuine scientific debate rather than a dispute between scientists and polluting industries trying to protect their profit margins.

  • Name: Stuffed Animal
    Date posted: 8/3/2011 12:35:37 PM
    Hometown: Kansas City

    Comment:

    I've had past disagreements with Wayne Besen, but here I concur with his opinion 100%. That "Morning Edition" segment was reprehensible! Not only does this "liberal" radio network make Gay people out to be freaks, it does the same for Transsexual people. Some folks here probably heard the tabloid-like story NPR broadcast a few months back, about a Transman who was obsessed with going topless in public. It was an inexcusable trivialization of what it means to be a female-born man. I'm one of many who was also offended by NPR's mistreatment of Juan Williams (so what about Mara Liasson's appearances on Fox News?), and of Tavis Smiley before him. Later this week, my blog Ignorance Is Plentiful will talk about a regional NPR affiliate that banned discussion of Dr. George Washington Carver's homsexuality. Something to look forward to is the probability that NPR will lose its government funding now; that's one good thing to come out of yesterday's debt ceiling deal!

  • Name: Keith Hobbs
    Date posted: 8/3/2011 11:50:46 AM
    Hometown: Dallas, Texas

    Comment:

    When someone presents evidence that a straight person has gone through conversion therapy to become gay then I will consider weather there is any credibility to these programs. I wonder if any rational heterosexual would even consider this possible. The entire basis of believing that gay people can convert to straight is that being gay is inferior or somehow not natural or normal.

  • Name: Jay Schiavone
    Date posted: 8/3/2011 10:58:43 AM
    Hometown: New Haven

    Comment:

    This is what NPR does. They carry water for the far right and play the part of liberal whipping boy for the same far right. NPR would sooner fire their president than confront the right wing. Don't wait for an apology, you're not right wing. Expect a sniveling, self-serving rationalization from NPR's "ombudsman," Alicia Shepard. I think the community would get more traction if Ari Shapiro, NPR's "show gay," was forced to justify this pathetic caricature of balanced reporting. I'm betting he will take pains to ignore this episode; he so cherishes his perch at the White House.

  • Name: PeterChicago
    Date posted: 8/3/2011 10:58:05 AM
    Hometown: Chicago

    Comment:

    cont. I look at the "ex-gays" in much the same way I look at people who don't want to believe in evolution or global warming - they use junk science to support their cause and I think it's crazy, but I have to acknowledge that they're present, with a formidible voice and support from political forces and to just simply not engage in debate with them by insisting that they be silenced is wrong.

  • Name: PeterChicago
    Date posted: 8/3/2011 10:53:36 AM
    Hometown: Chicago

    Comment:

    firstly you don't have to curse at me - I'm simply stating a truth: the national discourse on homosexuality isn't black/white - there are large segments of our population that have issues with it, and there are large swaths of folks that believe that homosexuality can be "cured" - I never said I agreed with them, I think what they believe is nonsense, but the debate is still ongoing, and clamping down on it by just denying that there's another very vocal size of non-insignificant numbers is short-sighted. You completely misunderstood my comment - I'm not justifying their belief - they're wrong unequivocally, but they have a major voice both in our culture and in our government and not dealing in debate with them, in my opinion is not terribly productive. Please don't get so quick to be offended and defensive at other's comments - this is exactly the issue I have with debate in general: if you misunderstood my comment as a defense of "ex-gay" therapy, fine, then ask me to clarify.

  • Name: Edward
    Date posted: 8/3/2011 10:24:41 AM
    Hometown: Millbrook, NY

    Comment:

    "but the jury is still out there for a lot of folks on homosexuality " @ PeterChicago: I cannot believe you wrote that. What the hell does that mean and how does it exempt bigots from using bad science and misinformation to corrode the quality of my life? What fucking justification does it offer? The jury is still out for a lot of folks? Are you mad? Shame on you.

  • Name: PeterChicago
    Date posted: 8/3/2011 9:46:54 AM
    Hometown: Chicago

    Comment:

    I listened to the story and also found nothing objectionable to the story - I really don't mind having a balanced discussion about "ex-gay" therapy - I find the practice to be nonsense, but there are folks out there who put a lot of stock in it, and that's the interesting aspect of the story. And to the tired "do they let KKK folks on to discuss race relations..." no, they don't because for the most part, the debate over race has been settled - there are racists out there, but the mainstream media/mainstream culture has been able to come to some sort of consensus regarding race, but the jury is still out there for a lot of folks on homosexuality (and no, they're not all fire-breathing, slack-jawed bigots). I believe in our argument so strongly, that I don't mind the other side presenting its view - in fact, I say "bring it on," and use statistics, studies and opinions from reputable bodies like APA, AMA, etc to back my arguments.

 PREVIOUS 1 2 3 NEXT  


 
 
Advocate Subscribe Promo Banner 300x50
 
Follow Us Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterSubscribe to our RSS feedsDownload our app
Facebook Activity