House Passes Defense Bill With Antigay Amendments
May 26 2011 3:45 PM ET
The House of Representatives on Thursday approved its version of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act with three controversial, antigay amendments, one of which is aimed at delaying repeal implementation of "don't ask, don't tell."
The amendments, all opposed by the Obama administration, would require the four service branch chiefs to sign off on DADT repeal, affirm that the Defense of Marriage Act applies to Defense Department policies, and prohibit weddings for same-sex couples at military facilities — as well as bar military chaplains from performing such weddings in their official capacity. The House version of the defense authorization bill was approved by a 322 to 96 vote.
In a Tuesday statement of policy, the White House objected to any legislative attempt to delay repeal of DADT, which would "create uncertainty for service members and their families," according to the statement.
The Senate is expected to begin debate on its version of the defense spending bill in June, Stars and Stripes reports.
Servicemembers United executive director Alexander Nicholson issued the following statement on passage of the House bill:
"The passage of the defense authorization bill with these hostile amendments included comes as no surprise, and it should not become a cause for concern as long as our allies in the Senate and the President all stand strong and refuse to support a defense bill containing these amendments," Nicholson said. "These amendments were nothing short of a waste of time by lawmakers who were sent to Washington to do serious business and a waste of taxpayer money. The Pentagon, the President, and the American people have made it abundantly clear — we are moving forward and building a stronger military free of unnecessary discrimination."
Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, said via the organization's website that the amendment offered by Rep. Todd Akin to prohibit on-base weddings for same-sex couples is "a dangerous proposition" that would restrict "the religious liberties of chaplains and service members."
"We must look to repeal supporters in the Senate, where the defense bill will be taken up next and where we are better positioned than in the House," Sarvis said. "We need to beat back this harmful language and make sure it does not survive in conference committee."
- Time to #BoycottIndiana? Celebs Blow Up Social Media
- 7 Immediate Examples of Backlash to Indiana's 'Religious Freedom'
- Trixie Mattel on Drag Race Elimination: 'It Was Rude'
- 11 Bad Habits Killing LGBT People
- Texas Successfully Blocks New Federal Rights for Gay Couples
- 12 Celebrities Who Said the “F” Word